• About
  • Farmers

vedika

~ your forum for critical and constructive writings

vedika

Category Archives: Current Affairs

COP21 Fossil Fuel Addiction : A guide for intervention from the climate justice movement

01 Tuesday Dec 2015

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Environment, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, Science

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

climate, COP21, Fossil Fuel, Paris-Climate-Talks

Brad Hornick

Author’s note: this article is meant to be both deadly serious and parody. It attempts humour and commits unforgiveable psychological reductionism of political issues. It is hoped the reader will discern the message behind the form of delivery.

Fossil Fuel Addiction is killing the planet. The Climate Justice Movement must ready for an intervention before this addiction kills us all. The following is a practical guide to recognize addictive behaviour as well as how to effectively intervene to assist in the Addict’s recovery. In the middle of global climate marches and actions worldwide, climate justice activists would do well to study these tips for an informed intervention.

The earth’s ecosystems metabolize everything human society produces and consumes. Its delicate ecological subsystems have been bombarded by toxic by-products of our industrial systems. Under normal conditions, it may be easy to believe that within moderate amounts, toxic substances can be metabolized to no effect on the planet as a whole.

Climate or Profit

But there is a pervasive tendency amongst the world’s Fossil Fuel Addicts to underestimate the amount consumed as well as the devastation wrought on systems in their entirety. Units of pollution add-up and like any addictive behaviour, it is easy to forget or hide how much has been consumed, especially true within the licentious atmosphere of extreme and unconventional energy exploitation.

The viability of whole ecosystems is at stake. Atmospheric, oceanic and earth systems globally are becoming corrupted at the systemic level. Arctic jet streams are languishing and becoming lazy. Global thermo-haline ocean currents are slowing down. Climate change is contributing to significantly alter nitrogen cycling processes, in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

The Fossil Fuel Addict will inevitably engage in self-denial about over-consumption, citing lower amounts than is really the case. But when the earth exhibits tipping point tendencies that threaten to “fire the clathrate gun,” dangerous defensive postures on the part of the Addict must be called-out. This is the time to recognize that the Addict has hit rock bottom, that there is an imminent crash, driven by multiple sets of amplified positive feedbacks producing abrupt and runaway climate changes.

Justifying ‘Safe Levels’

With frankenweather as a backdrop, a desperate coordinated effort has been underway amongst industry and the nations of the world to define, justify and reinforce their own notions of “safe levels of global warming.” While it may be obvious to thinking and sober people that in fact there can be no safe levels of global warming, it appears that this realization is not so obvious to people making decisions at the Paris COP21 meetings.

Multiple scenarios are invented, draped in mystifying strings of scientific jargon, tight correlations and mathematical equations such as “30 per cent emissions reductions below 2005 levels by 2020 for a 66 per cent chance of averting 2C rise (which would permit human survival).” High levels of credulity are aspired to by cloaking these numbers in precise terms as if they represent solid, scientifically valid insight into climate and social science.

Versions of these statements are rolled-out to the public by scientists, activists, government representatives in a logical-positivist heuristics of persuasion for maximum saliency and self-efficacy. “Critical” commentators join the fray, commenting on the cogency of the numbers themselves, add their own dimensions to the same questionable logic, and thereby consent/submit to the “authority” of the form in which Fossil Fuel Addict statements are couched as if they represent reality.

Addictive Behaviour Justifying Non-Action

But this collective conspiracy to enable a semblance of solid foundation, all only to justify non-action should be recognized as the desperate call for help that it is. If the equations themselves are analyzed, as well as the frames and conventions in which they are generated, are analyzed – it becomes clear they hardly reflect the reality to which they intend to refer.

The impacts from climate change have always risen at a far faster rate than either scientists and the public can keep up with. We know that IPCC reports have consistently understated the threat and urgency. Recent research by James Hansen concludes that threshold effects of global warming could be kicking in at a global temperature rise of 1C beyond pre-industrial benchmarks. In other words, that means kicking in NOW, not at 1.5C or 2C!

Fossil Fuel Addiction is the inability to see beyond mechanisms of denial or culpability avoidance. The Addict exhibits behaviour that includes: minimizing, rationalizing, forgetting, self-deception, suppression and repression. We have seen these mechanisms at work in multiple instances in the last 20 iterations of United Nations Committee of the Parties (COP) meetings. After 20 years, emissions this year are 63 per cent higher than when “negotiations” started.

Addictive Behaviour is Enabled by the Rest of Us

Because addictive behaviour has been allowed to continue over such a long time, fossil fuel addicts have been given free reign to experience dissociation and a tendency to adopt personality traits governed by self-interestedness, amorality, callousness and deceit. Furthermore, Addicts tend to not suffer from guilt and are able to mimic human qualities of empathy, caring and altruism.

Our toleration of lax social norms and our passivity toward addictive behaviour has encouraged the rapid spread of this disease to the point that it has become endemic amongst the global elite. As a result, the rest of the world endures the destructive consequences and painful relationships with Fossil Fuel Addicts due in part to their own low-self-esteem and co-dependencies of the Addicts.

The world is fed a myriad of self-justifications given to support Fossil Fuel Addiction. At a personal level, these exculpatory rationalizations take on the form of irrational and often vituperative personal attacks on others. Look for some of these admissions that are ‘signs’ of Fossil Fuel Addiction behaviour. The Fossil Fuel Addict may say things such as:

  • the real problem is people judging them
  • their addictions are somehow necessary to the normal functioning of the economy
  • it’s their job and someone else would do it if it weren’t them
  • there are no alternatives to fossil fuel related jobs
  • renewable energy is boring, costly, inadequate and inefficient
  • people who dislike coal, oil and gas are weird and uptight
  • our economy is being ruined by socialists and anarchists and that is why their life is miserable
  • the weather is to blame

But these flippant associations should be juxtaposed to the reality and measured against objective circumstances. Fossil Fuel Addiction is leading to a terminal situation in which human civilization is facing an unprecedented, extreme, intractable and imminently catastrophic threat to life support systems. Even if activists are ‘uptight’, as well as anxious, depressed and morbid, the Addict must be able to concede that it is for legitimate reason.

Treatment

Treatment begins by coming out of denial. As long as polluters remain in denial, they will continue to pollute and blame everyone and everything else as the cause of their problems. If a Fossil Fuel Addict is able to muster enough honesty, then recovery can begin. If they refuse to come out of denial, the climate justice movement must perform a planned intervention with a professional who helps the Addict to see the truth in their polluting.

It is incumbent upon all those who consider themselves to be part of the “Climate Justice Movement” to step-up, lead the politicians and CEOs and at the same time enhance their own sense of mission and self-worth, by putting any sense of our own weaknesses and emotional vulnerabilities aside, by focussing on helping Fossil Fuel Addicts help themselves!

Major high-risk polluters attending the COP21 conference are a danger to themselves and others; they need to get their problem under control. After seasoned activists have tried suggesting to Committee of Parties over 20 international climate summits that they need to face their addictions but having only been met with resistance, it is time for an intervention. Time to confront Addicts to help them see the danger their abuse is to themselves and others and begin a process of recovery. It is time to show them that we care and that they themselves, as well as others are being hurt by their behaviour.

Intervention Guidelines

Pollution is a disease of excuses, so you must remove all possible reasons for the Fossil Fuel Addict to refuse your help: promises to “meet targets” at some far-off date; promises to privately and voluntarily “pledge” or “commit” to change, rather than submit to more stringent, mandatory, legally enforced carbon targets; promises to reform but not fully transform through devises such as green capitalism, market mechanisms, green taxes and other miraculous cures. Remember that you must deal with the deep causation of the addiction and not the symptoms.

Don’t be fooled. Addiction is irrational, unbalanced and unhealthy behaviour patterning resulting from abnormal obsessions. It could not continue without a distortion of reality and delusional thinking. The Fossil Fuel Addict may swear that s/he is clean and sober when negotiating the addiction, while still under the influence of the profit motive. S/he will try to conceal the amount of nature consumed in the commodification process. S/he will invent alibies for absence at oil spills and methane releases as present these as “mistakes” that anyone could do. They may plead “I promise” and use such phrases as “I know I have been wrong, and this time I have learned my lesson. It will not happen again!”

Recognize half-truths. Like cigarette addiction, Fossil Fuel Addicts (FFAs) may express sincere desire to convert to cleaner forms of technology, but they accomplish little to achieve that outcome. Addicts may try to focus attention on meagre attempts at promoting conversion to a greener economy on a particular day and use this as evidence that they have control over their polluting. They will ignore other aspects of their life that do not support their polluting behaviour, using half-truths along with their denial to support continued substance abuse.

Avoid Stigmatizing. When unduly threatened in an uncontrolled environment Fossil Fuel Addicts may react to the stigma associated with this disorder causing addicts to close ranks in private foras such as the G20 or the G7 where new ways fossil fuel addictive behaviour is legitimized and codified into international agreements such as the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). Cornering of the FFA may lead to this kind of institutionalization of neurosis, working into the very infrastructure of society the malfeasance of the Addict and should be avoided at all costs.

We need our planet back.

Confront the problem head-on by facing it in direct actions. Choose a time such as the COP21 meetings when the polluter attempts to be sober and transparent about their condition. Remain calm and corner the polluter while exercising non-violent civil disobedience in a situation where it may be a surprise. It may take place on the streets, in an office, at home or within a neutral place, like a restaurant or country club of their choice.

Be as firm and specific as possible by telling the FFA how his/her behaviour affects you personally and those around you. Give personal examples such as “my house burned down from forest fires,” “my island is disappearing from sea level rise,” or more large scale examples such as “this year you caused the polar ice caps to melt causing untold mayhem world wide.” Tell them “I won’t let this happen again. I know you love your children, but polluting makes you a different person.” Tell them how his/her addiction makes you, your friends and family feel!

Show them you care. Let your combined lifetime of existential angst over the damage caused by big fossil fuel, big pharma, big agro, big armament, etc. etc. well-up and spill into their consciousness. Tell them how your neighbours and co-workers have noticed their psychopathic behaviour and have lost respect for them. Expect hostility from a possible paranoid reaction that you are part of a growing movement to overthrow the foundations of their established order in the global hierarchy. Meet this antagonism with firm and calm resolve. Show the Fossil Fuel Addict in no uncertain terms that you care about him, but that you simply will not tolerate his paranoid behaviour any further.

Keep your eyes on the ball. All of the sophisticated science still knows virtually nothing about the complexities of deep ecosystems dynamics. The unspoken and mysterious truths contained with the notion of the precautionary principle presently loom large. At the edge of global climate precariousness, we might as well adopt a “primal reference” immediately as an obvious and deliberate “new” benchmark which the Addict can lean on; that the average population dose from human-made radiative forcing should be no greater than that which the population already receives from “natural” causes, or from pre-industrial levels. “Zero tolerance” are the new code-words!

Linear thinking is the enemy. Addicts tend toward linear and concrete dissociative thinking. Remind them we are now living amidst abrupt climate change. When severe distortions are introduced and become systemically disruptive, eco-systems become defined more by chaos theory and complex dynamics – characterized by lack of predictability. Excessive input levels of anthropogenic carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and ozone, water vapor, unsettle complex chemical compositions and structural balances in delicately balanced ecosystems. Old epistemologies and ontologies for navigating complex bio-chemical and thermodynamic principles don’t apply!

Don’t let the Addict slip into old behaviours. Intruding into the assumptions behind the mainstream discourses of Addicts are biases generated within cultures of commodity production in which perpetual energy and material throughput are system requirements. This provides a deceptive escape valve of projected “carbon budgets” extended into the future with continued production of externalities within which countries and corporations can still massively pollute. To prevent recidivism, isolate and obstruct Addicts from contact with the ghettoized language of their homies.

Ask others for help. If you don’t succeed as a small affinity group, plan more interventions. This time, invite friends, family, co-workers, flash mobs, Facebook groups… anyone from the 99% who has been personally affected by the polluters insensitivities. Tell them all how to be prepared to share specific examples of how the polluter has hurt them and our non-human friends through their sustained abusive behaviour. Each person should be given an opportunity on the streets and with the blow-horn to offer her/his sensitive thoughts.

Don’t be afraid to say how you really feel. A non-violent, direct-action, civil disobedience intervention will not be effective if you worry more about the Addicts’ feelings than you do about the future of the planet, or those immediately immediately impacted. Coax polluters to face their victims such as the “Vulnerable 20” or the “Alliance of Small Island States,” the many indigenous communities. Don’t exaggerate, but tell the polluter how they are actually murderers and that their actions are killing life on the planet, its wonderful species, and any prospects for our civilization to survive. Suggest some prefacing nightmare stats of lives being lost to the Fossil Fuel Addicts. Convince them that they need to show some humility and remorse for the past. Now is the time for them to make sincere apologies and making amends, not more excuses.

Get professional help. If you are still not able to convince the polluter to seek treatment, ask a seasoned professional agitator to assist you.

Set consequences for the problem. Let the Addict know you mean business. If his pollution affects your consumption patterns, tell him you will divest from companies that supply his products. If his company sponsors events or public institutions, tell him you will campaign with others to boycott those venues. If he pollutes in your home, tell him you will change the locks on your door, or move out, until he is sober. Threaten civil and criminal lawsuits! Seek compensation! Tell them their actions will haunt them all there life – suggest possibilities of “deferred prosecution.” Make the consequences something the polluter will not be able to live with. But be sure you don’t use empty threats – you must have the persistence to campaign on the polluters’ behalf until the addiction is resolved.

Offer hope in solving the problem. If at the COP21 meetings, hold the polluter within the conference centre and restrict his freedom until s/he is cured. Don’t allow any actions that enable the polluters addictions – such as “voluntary INDCs.” Don’t allow visitors. This may frustrate the polluter – and you – but remember, rules are in place in the interests of sobriety, as well as no less than the averting of catastrophic climate change. Let the polluter know you will stick with him/her on the long road to recovery and eco-socialist revolution.

Find Alternatives. Losing an addiction is like losing a body part. A big empty space will be left by the losses caused by the “cure.” Addicts tend to live in the future, hoping the continued addictions will be paid handsomely in quarterly reports and bottom-lines. To avoid the problem of filling these spaces up with regrets, if-onlys and could-have-beens, ensure that a new personal and political vision re-occupies these spaces, one not based on private property, the growth and profit imperative, inequality and class division, etc.

Now Celebrate. Remember what Jean Paul Sartre says… real encounter with the “other” contains the potential for mutual liberation. When you help a friend to overcome their addictions you are also liberating yourself and the world from capitalism. You deserve a great big pat on the back, and the right to form new lines of governmental authority based on socialist and anarchist principles. A new day will dawn!

Finally, remember there is no cure for FFAs. Once a Fossil Fuel Addict, always an FFA. Can this disease be kept within remission with treatment? Even with the potential for sobriety, polluters think they can pollute again, without same devastating consequences.

When corporations and their state enablers admit they have a problem with Fossil Fuel Addiction – that is when the real work begins. Recovery is not a single event, but will require a process of permanent revolution in multiple areas of life. Learning how to cope with these changing circumstances is a lifelong process – requires strong commitment and support.

Admittance to the COP21 opens the door for climate justice to enter a polluter’s life and radically transform them from inside out. The personal acceptance of the guilt, shame – give the polluter the power to pollute or not pollute – one day at a time. Help them to learn to live without! •

Brad Hornick is a Vancouver writer and Ph.D. candidate at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver Canada. Some of his writing appears onrabble.ca blog. He is active with systemchangenotclimatechange.org, vancouverclimateconvergence.org and parisclimatejustice.org. Follow his tweets at @bradhornick.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

నీకు తగిన చెప్పులు వేసుకో, నీ చెప్పులు వేసుకోమని నన్ను వత్తిడి చేయకు !

01 Tuesday Dec 2015

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, NATIONAL NEWS, Opinion, Religious Intolarence

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

BLF, Intolerance, vikram sampath

ఎం కోటేశ్వరరావు

అసహన వివాదం సద్దుమణిగింది. కొత్తగా ఎక్కడా దాడులు జరగలేదు. జనం పిఆర్‌సి గురించి చర్చించుకుంటున్నారు. ఈ సమయంలో సినీ హీరో అమీర్‌ఖాన్‌ అసహనం గురించి లేవనెత్తటం ఏమిటంటూ కొందరు ‘పెద్దలు’ తమ అసహనాన్ని వ్యక్త పరిచారు. ఇప్పుడు బెంగలూరు సాహిత్య పండగ సారధి విక్రమ్‌ సంపత్‌ తన అభిప్రాయాలను తాను చెప్పుకుంటే మతవాది, మరొకటి అంటూ ముద్రలు వేస్తూ తనపై అసహనం వ ్యక్తం చేస్తున్నారంటూ ఎదురు దాడికి దిగారు. విమర్శలను సహించాలంటూనే , వ్యక్తిగతంగా తనను లక్ష్యంగా చేసుకున్నారంటూ తనను విమర్శించిన వారిపై అసహనం వ్యక్తం చేస్తూ డిసెంబరు 5,6 తేదీలలో జరిగే సాహిత్య పండగ బాధ్యతల నుంచి వైదొలగి మరోసారి అసహనంపై చర్చకు తెరతీశాడు. అమీర్‌ఖాన్‌కు ఎందరో ప్రముఖులు బాసటగా నిలిచినట్లే సంపత్‌కు సైతం కొందరు మద్దతుగా ఆయన వెనుక నిలిచారు. అమీర్‌ఖాన్‌కు మద్దతుగా నిలిచిన వారిని కూడా విమర్శించిన వారు మరి ఇప్పుడేమంటారో ?

కొందరి దృష్టిలో వేలాది మందితో రాసక్రీడలు విశృంఖలత్వం, అదే మరికొందరి దృష్టిలో లొట్టలు వేసుకుంటూ ఆస్వాదించే భగవంతుడి లీల. ఒక నాడు ఒక భార్య, ఒక మాట, ఒక బాట నీతి, మరొక నాడు అష్టభార్యలు, వేలాది మందితో సరసాలు, ఎప్పటికెయ్యది అప్పటికామాటలాడి తన మద్దతుదార్లను రక్షించుకోవటమే నీతి, రీతి. అసహనం లేదా సహనం అనేది కూడా అలాంటిదే. తాను మాత్రమే చెప్పేది వింటే ఎదుటి వాడికి సహనం వున్నట్లు, దానిలోని హేతువు, ఇతర అంశాలను ప్రశ్నిస్తే అసహన పరుడు. తన మనో భావాలను గాయపరిచాడంటూ దెబ్బలాటలకు దిగుతున్నారు. ఏకంగా చంపేస్తున్నారు. గతంలో వాద ప్రతివాదనలు,ఖండనలకు పరిమితమయ్యేవారు. వాటిలో విఫలమై ఇప్పుడు ఏకంగా హతమార్చేందుకు సంచార ముఠాలు తిరుగుతున్నాయి. వాటికి అధికారంలో వున్న వారు ప్రత్యక్షంగానో పరోక్షంగానో మద్దతు ఇవ్వటమే కొత్త పరిణామం. నియంతల పాలనా కాలంలో లాటిన్‌ అమెరికాలోని దేశాలలో తమను వ్యతిరేకించిన వారిని, విమర్శించిన వారిని రహస్య హంతక దళాలు వేలాది మందిని మాయం చేశాయి. దశాబ్దాల తరబడి వారంతా అదృశ్యమైన వారి జాబితాలోనే వున్నారు తప్ప నిజానికి హత్యలకు గురయ్యారు. ఈ విషయాలను కమ్యూనిస్టులు చెప్పినపుడు అ వారలాగే చెబుతారులే అంటూ అనేక మంది పెద్దలు పెదవి విరిచారు. కనీసం విచారణకు డిమాండ్‌కూడా చేయలేదు. చిలీ నియంతలను వ్యతిరేకించిన కవి పాబ్లో నెరూడాను సైతం హత్య చేసినట్లు నాలుగు దశాబ్దాల తరువాత జరుగుతున్న విచారణలో వెల్లడవుతోంది. నరేంద్ర దబోల్కర్‌ను హత్య చేసినపుడు పెద్దగా అనుమానాలు రాలేదు, గోవింద పన్సారేను చంపినపుడు సందేహం వచ్చింది. కలుబర్గి హత్యతో నిర్ధారణ అయింది. అందుకే అంతటి ప్రతి స్పందన వచ్చింది. హత్యలతో బెదిరించి నోరు మూయించవచ్చని భావించిన వారు అది సాధ్యం కాదని తేలటంతో రెండవ రంగాన్నికూడా తెరిచారు. ఈ దాడి కత్తులతో కాదు కలాలతో జరుగుతోంది.ఇదింకా ప్రమాదకరం.

అనేక మంది రచయితలు, కళాకారులు, ఇతర మేధావుల తీవ్ర నిరసనల తరువాత అక్టోబరు 23న కేంద్ర సాహిత్య అకాడమీ కార్యవర్గ సమావేశం జరిగింది. కలుబర్గి హత్యను ఖండించాలని, అసహన పరులను నిరసించాలని కోరుతున్న సభ్యులు నల్ల రిబ్బన్లు ధరించి తమ వాదనలను వినిపించారు. సాహిత్య అకాడమీ హత్యపై తన మౌనాన్ని కొనసాగించాలని, రాజకీయాలకు దూరంగా వుండాలని వాదించిన వారు భారతమాతాకీ జై అంటూ నినాదాలు చేస్తూ అసహనంతో తీర్మానాన్ని అడ్డుకొనే రాజకీయం చేశారు, వారూ సాహితీవేత్తలే, వీరూ సాహితీవేత్తలే అయినా ఎంత తేడా !

చరిత్రలో ఎందరో లబ్ద ప్రతిష్టులైన కవులు,కళాకారులు కాలం ధర్మం చేశారు. అంతటితో వారి అధ్యాయాలు ముగిశాయి. కాపీ రైట్‌ వున్న వారి వారసులు లాభసాటిగా వుంటే వారి పుస్తకాలను తిరిగి అచ్చేయిస్తారు, లేకపోతే లేదు. కానీ కన్నడ రచయిత కలుబుర్గి హత్య దేశంలో కొత్త అధ్యాయానికి నాంది పలికింది. ఆయన భావాలకు కాపీ లెఫ్ట్‌ తప్ప ఎవరికీ రైట్‌ లేదు. ప్రతి తరంలోనూ భావప్రకటనా స్వేచ్ఛ కావాలని కోరుకొనే ప్రతివారూ ఆయనకు వారసులుగా మారిపోతారు. అలాంటి వారికి ఒక కలుబుర్గి, ఒక గోవింద పన్సారే,ఒక నరేంద్ర దబోల్కర్‌ ధృవతారలుగా వెలుగునిస్తూనే వుంటారు.

ఒక విక్రమ సంపత్‌ , ఒక చేతన భగత్‌, ఒక కమల హసన్‌, ఒక విద్యాబాలన్‌ ఎవరైనా కానివ్వండి వారి దృష్టిలో సహనానికి, అసహనానికి అర్ధాలు వేరుగా వుండవచ్చు, ‘వేదాల్లోనే అన్నీ వున్నాయి’ కనుక అసలైన అర్ధాన్ని వెలికి తీయించుకొని చదువుకొంటారు అది వేరే విషయం. కలుబర్గి హత్యను ఖండించాలా లేదా అవార్డులను వాపసు ఇవ్వాలా లేదా అన్నది వారి చైతన్యానికి సంబంధించిన అంశం.అవార్డులు వెనక్కు ఇవ్వాలని పనిగట్టుకొని ఒక బృందంగా ఎవరైనా పిలుపు ఇచ్చారా ? లేదా పైన పేర్కొన్నవారు లేదా వారిమాదిరి ఆలోచిస్తున్న వారి ఇళ్లకు గానీ వెళ్లి బొట్టుపెట్టి అవార్డు వాపసు ఇమ్మని అడిగిన వారెవరు? సభ్య సమాజంలో వున్నారు గనుక సంచలనం కలిగించిన అంశాలపై ప్రముఖులను విలేకర్లు అడుగుతారు, లేదా ప్రత్యేకంగా వాకబు చేసి అభిప్రాయాలు తీసుకొని వెల్లడిస్తారు. కారణాలు ఏమైనా అనేక మంది పెద్దలు నోరు విప్పలేదు. అది వారి హక్కు. అవార్డులు వెనక్కు ఇచ్చిన వారిపై అసహనం వ్యక్తం చేయటం లేదా వారి చర్యను తప్పు పట్టే హక్కు కొందరికి ఎవరిచ్చారు.అయితే వారికి తమ అభిప్రాయాలు చెప్పే హక్కులేదా అంటే అది నైతిక పరమైంది తప్ప మరొకటి కాదు. కలుబుర్గిని హత్య చేసింది, అలాగే మరికొందరిని మట్టుబెడతామని ప్రకటించిన వారు ఎవరు? ఆ రచయితల భావాలు, వాటి వ్యాప్తిని సహించలేని వారు తప్ప మరొకరు కాదు. అలాంటి వారి దుశ్చర్యలను ముందు ఖండించి లేదా తాము సరైనదని అనుకొనే పద్దతులలో నిరసించి ఇతరులు అనుసరించిన అవాంఛనీయ పద్దతులపై తమ అభిప్రాయాలు చెప్పి వుంటే ఎవరికీ అభ్యంతరం లేదు. వారావిధంగా చెయ్యలేదు. అందువలన అలాంటివారికి ఇతరులను నిందించే లేదా విమర్శించే నైతిక హక్కు ఎక్కడుంది? జార్జి కార్లిన్‌ అనే పెద్ద మనిషి సహసం గురించి ఇలా చెప్పాడు.’ మతం చెప్పుల జతవంటిది, నీకు తగిన వాటిని ఎంచుకో అంతేకాని నన్ను నీ చెప్పులు వేసుకోమనవద్దు’ అన్నాడు.

నిరసన ఫలానా పద్దతులలోనే వ్యక్తం చేయాలని ఏ వేదాలలో వుంది? ఎందరో పెద్దలు నాయనా ఇది తగదు అని నయానా భయానా చెప్పారు. కవి చౌడప్ప తనదైన పద్దతులలో బూతులతో నిరసించాడు, వేమన హేతువుతో ఎండగట్టాడు, ఎవరి పద్దతి వారిది. తమలపాకుతో నువ్వు ఒకటేస్తే తలుపు చెక్కతో నే రెండంటా. అసలు వెయ్యటం సరైనదా కాదా అన్నది సమస్య. సరైనదే అయితే నువ్వు కోరుకున్నట్లే నేనెందుకు వెయ్యాలి?

తాజాగా విక్రమ సంపత్‌ విషయాన్నే చూద్దాం. సాహిత్య అకాడమే ప్రభుత్వానికి ప్రాతినిధ్యం వహించదు, పద్మ అవార్డులను తిరిగి ఇవ్వటం మంచిది అంటాడా పెద్ద మనిషి. ఎందుకంటే ఆయనకా అవార్డు లేదు. మరి పద్ద అవార్డు వున్న కమల్‌ హసన్‌ ఏమన్నాడు. అవార్డులు తిరిగి ఇవ్వటం కాదు, ఇతర పద్దతుల్లో నిరసన తెలపాలి అన్నాడు. ప్రఖ్యాత శాస్త్రవేత్త పిఎం భార్గవ తన పద్మ అవార్డును వెనక్కి ఇస్తున్నట్లు ప్రకటించగానే కాషాయ దళాలు అత్యవసర పరిస్ధితి కాలంలో మీరు ఎందుకు నిరసన తెలపలేదు అని దాడి చేశారు. అంటే ఎప్పటికెయ్యది అప్పటికా మాటలాడి అన్నట్లు పైన చెప్పిన బాపతు తమ అసహనాన్ని వ్యక్తం చేస్తున్నారు.

విక్రమ సంపత్‌ తన గోడు లేదా గోస చెప్పుకుంటే అభ్యంతరం ఏముంటుంది? ఎవరికేమీ పోదు. నిరసన తెలపటం సరైనదా కాదా అన్నది తేల్చుకోవాల్సి వచ్చినపుడు ముందు అటో ఇటో ఎటుండాలో తేల్చుకోవాలి. తరువాత ఎలా తెలపాలన్నది నిర్ణయించుకోవాలి. విక్రమ సంపత్‌ అలా తేల్చుకోలేదు. రెండవదాని గురించి మాట్లాడుతూ పద్మ అవార్డులు తిరిగి ఇచ్చి నిరసన తెలపవచ్చు అని ఒక వుచిత సలహా ఇచ్చాడు. అంతవరకు పరిమితమైనా ఇబ్బంది లేదు. అంతకు మించి నిరసన తెలిపిన వారిపై వ్యంగ్య బాణాలు వేసి తానెటు వున్నాడో తానేమిటో స్వయంగా బహిర్గతపరచుకున్నాడు. అవార్డులు పుచ్చుకున్నప్పటి కంటే తిరిగి ఇచ్చివేసినపుడు మీడియా వారికి పెద్ద ఎత్తున ప్రచారం ఇచ్చిందట. నిజమే గాంధీ మహాత్ముడిని చంపక ముందు గాడ్సే ఎవడు, వాడు పనిచేసిన ఆర్‌ఎస్‌ఎస్‌ గురించి ఎవరికి తెలుసు. మీడియాకు వారి నిజస్వరూపాన్ని బయట పెట్టాల్సిన అవసరం ఏముంటుంది ? జనం గాంధీని గుర్తుంచుకున్నంత కాలం గాడ్సేను, వాడిని ప్రేరేపించిన వారినీ కూడా గుర్తుంచుకోక తప్పదు. ఎందుకంటే గాడ్సేకు గుడి కట్టిస్తామని, ఏటేటా స్మారక దినాలు జరుపుతామని చెబుతున్నవారి గురించి కూడా అదే మీడియా రోజూ చెబుతున్నదా లేదా ? అవార్డు వాపసు తరహా నిరసనలతో అంగీకరించని, సామాజిక మీడియాలో అదే విషయాన్ని వ్యక్తం చేసిన తమ వంటి వారిని మతవాదులని, ఫాసిస్టులని, అసహనపరులని ఎన్నో విధాలుగా తమపై దాడి చేశారని వాపోయాడు. నిజమే ముందే చెప్పుకున్నట్లు మీ వంటి వారు నిరసన తెలిపి వుంటే ప్రజలు రాళ్లకు బదులు పూలు చల్లి వుండేవారు. ముందుకు తీసుకుపోవాల్సిస సమాజాన్ని వెనక్కు నడిపించాలని ఎవరైనా మూర్ఖులు ప్రయత్నిస్తే జనం ఏమైనా చేస్తారు. ఒక గుంపులో భయం తలెత్తితే ఎవడైనా ఒకడు తమ గుంపు వాడు కాదనుకుంటే వాడిని తిరునాళ్లలో కొట్టే జనం మాదిరి జంతు ప్రవత్తి తమపై విమర్శకులలో తనకు కనిపించిందని విక్రమ సంపత్‌ నోరు పారవేసుకున్నాడు. మరొక చోట గొర్రెల మందలా ఆలోచించకుండా ఒకదాని వెనుక ఒకటి పోయినట్లుగా అవార్డుల వాపసు ఇచ్చిన వారు ప్రవర్తించారని తూలనాడాడు. ఇలాంటి అసహనపరుడు, తోటి సాహితీవేత్తలను నిందించే వారితో ఆత్మగౌరవం కలవారు ఎవరైనా ఎలా కలసి పని చేస్తారు? తనలోని అసలు ‘సాహితీవేత్తను’ స్వయంగా బయట పెట్టక ముందు సంపత్‌ వైఖరి గురించి తెలిసినప్పటికీ సహించి అనేక మంది బెంగలూరు సాహిత్య పండగలో పాల్గొనేందుకు అంగీకరించారు. ఆ తరువాత ఒక ఆంగ్ల పత్రికలో సంపత్‌ అవార్డులు తిరిగి ఇచ్చినవారిని కించపరుస్తూ రాశాడు. ఆ తరువాత సాహిత్య అకాడమీ అంతర్గత కారణాలు ఏమైనప్పటికీ కలుబర్గి హత్యను ఖండించింది. విక్రమ సంపత్‌ వంటి వారు ఆ తరువాత కూడా తమ వైఖరిని మార్చుకోలేదు. ఇంత జరిగాక అలాంటి వారితో వేదిక పంచుకోవటంలో అర్ధం వుండదు. అది విక్రమ సంపత్‌ ఇంట్లో పెళ్లి కాదు. ఒక భావజాలానికి సంబంధించింది, ఎవరెటు వుండాలో తేల్చుకోమని నిరసన తెలిపిన వారి ముందు సవాళ్లు విసురుతున్నారు.

సాహిత్య అకాడమీ రాజకీయ సంస్ధ కాదు కనుక దాని సాహిత్య పరిధి దాటి రాకూడదని అన్నాడు.దేశంలో ప్రతిరోజూ ఎందరో రాజకీయ వేత్తల హత్యలు జరుగుతున్నాయి. ఎవరైనా ఎప్పుడైనా సాహిత్య అకాడమీ ఖండించలేదని అన్నారా, ఖండించమని అడిగారా? లేదే ! ఎందుకీ అర్ధం పర్ధం లేని అడ్డుసవాళ్లు ? తన అవార్డు పొందిన, రాజకీయాలతో సంబంధం లేని కలుబర్గి హత్యను కదా ఖండించమని అడిగింది ! సాహిత్య అకాడమీ రాజకీయ సంస్ధ కాదు, కలుబర్గి హత్యను ఖండించాల్సిన అవసరం లేదు, రాజకీయాలకు దూరంగా వుండాలంటూ ఇలాంటి పరివార్‌ ప్లీడర్లు చెట్ల కింద ఎంత వాదించినా అది తప్పుడు వాదన అని జనం అనుకోవటం ప్రారంభించిన తరువాతే సాహిత్య అకాడమే ఎట్టకేలకు హత్య జరిగిన 53 రోజుల తరువాత ఖండించింది. మరి ఈ ప్లీడర్లు ఇప్పుడు ఏం వాదిస్తారు. అందుకే ఇలాంటి వారి ఆధ్వర్యంలో జరిగే సాహిత్య వుత్సవానికి తాము హాజరు కావటం లేదని నలుగురు రచయితలు ప్రకటించిన తరువాత వుత్సవ డైరెక్టర్‌గా తాను రాజీనామా చేస్తున్నట్లు ప్రకటించాడు. ఆ రచయితలు అసహన పరులని ఆరోపించాడు.తాను రాజీనామా చేసిన తరువాత తనకు ఎందరో మద్దతు తెలిపారని చెప్పుకున్నాడు. గాంధీని జాతిపితగా అంగీకరించని, గాడ్సేకు మద్దతు తెలుపుతున్నవారే సిగ్గుపడటం లేదు, ఆ పరంపరకు చెందిన వారు విక్రమ సంపత్‌ను సమర్దించటంలో ఆశ్చర్యం ఏముంది. హిట్లర్‌ పోయినా ఫాసిజం పోలేదు. వారసులు పుట్టుకువస్తూనే వున్నారు.

‘ కొన్ని సందర్బాలలో మీ ప్రభ కళ్లు జిగేల్‌ మనేట్లు వెలుగుతుంది. అది జనం నీ నిజ స్వరూపాన్ని చూడకుండా గుడ్డివారిని చేస్తుంది’ అని షానన్‌ ఎల్‌ ఆల్డర్‌ చెప్పారు. అసహనాన్ని సహించటం పిరికి తనం అన్న పెద్దల సూక్తిని సదా గుర్తుంచుకోవాలి.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

LOK SABHA ADJOURNED REPEATEDLY OVER CPI-M MEMBER’S REMARKS

30 Monday Nov 2015

Posted by raomk in BJP, CPI(M), Current Affairs, Left politics, NATIONAL NEWS

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

CPI(M), Intolerance, LOK SABHA

Lok Sabha adjourned repeatedly over CPI-M member's remarks

Parliament House of India

 New Delhi, 30 Nov 2015: The Lok Sabha witnessed repeated adjournments on Monday as differences between some members of opposition and the treasury benches erupted when a CPI-M member attributed some remarks to Home Minister Rajnath Singh.Mohammad Salim of the Communist Party of India-Marxist(CPI-M), who initiated a discussion in the Lok Sabha on the issue of intolerance, cited the home minister as having made the remarks to a magazine. Ruling National Democratic Alliance members contested this strongly.While denying having ever made such remarks, Home Minister Rajnath Singh said he was deeply hurt by the claim.

“I am (have) never been so much hurt in my parliamentary life. If a home minister makes such comments, he has no right to be on his post,” Rajnath Singh said, adding that members of the house and people from the minority community know that he cannot make such remarks.Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan said Salim’s remarks pertaining to the magazine report on the minister would not go on record and she would examine the issue.”I will give my ruling,” she said.

Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Rajiv Pratap Rudy said the member should withdraw the comments till their authenticity was ascertained.Rudy said it would be difficult for members on the treasury benches to sit in the house after allegations “which are dangerous for the country”.Biju Janata Dal member Bhartruhari Mahtab said a member has to give prior notice before levelling allegations against another member.

Saugata Roy of the Trinamool Congress, however, said there was no denial from the minister after the publication of the report in the magazine.Salim later said his intention was not to hurt the minister and he had done the job of intelligence agencies by telling the minister about the publication of comments attributed to him.

Rudy, however, insisted that Salim should withdraw his words.As the standoff continued, the speaker adjourned the house for an hour.After the house reassembled, Rudy again insisted on the CPI-M member withdrawing his remarks till the authenticity was proven.

Salim, however, said he would not withdraw his remarks. “This is also intolerance. This is ridiculous,” he said.Salim said he cited the magazine after questions were put to him about his remarks.As the standoff persisted, Deputy Speaker M. Thambidurai briefly adjourned the house.When the house reassembled after its second adjournment of the day, Congress member M. Veerapa Moily said that since both Salim and Rajnath Singh had spoken, the matter should be put to rest.But the stalemate persisted and the house was adjourned till 3.15 p.m. and then again till 4 p.m..

When the house met at 3.15 pm, Salim said he was going by the rules and remarked he would have been happy if Rajnath Singh had become prime minister instead of Narendra Modi.Parliamentary Affairs Minister M. Venkaiah Naidu objected to his remarks and said such comments can also be made about CPI-M general secretary Sitaram Yechury.(IANS)

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

Poor prices for Spanish vegetables

30 Monday Nov 2015

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Farmers, INTERNATIONAL NEWS

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Farm prices, Farmers

 

The Spanish vegetable season has been quite disappointing so far, particularly for growers. It is very quiet on the market as well. Guy Deryckere from Van Lier says that this season has not been good for any Spanish vegetables, except zucchini, “It is slow on the market right now, which is why prices are not rising.”

Guy continues, “With the exception of zucchini, the prices for Spanish vegetables are very low. We have not yet received Spanish tomatoes. They are obviously still very cheap in Spain. They arrive at a different time each year. Sometimes they arrive mid-November, other times they arrive at the beginning of December. By the time we start with Spanish tomatoes it is usually already December.”

Guy expects that the poor greenhouse vegetable situation will continue, “For the situation to improve the weather in Spain would have to cool down so that there is less supply, but for now there is a lot of product.”

Spanish growers hand out their products for free

This week Spanish growers gave out their vegetables for free. On Tuesday the Union of Small Farmers (UPA) in Andalusia gave out more than 8,500 kilos of tomatoes, cucumbers and bell peppers in the center of Almeria in protest against the low prices. In just a few weeks time the price of tomatoes in Spain has fallen from 1.17 to 24 cents.

Growers are blaming the warm weather, which has lasted longer than normal, (in their own words) ‘aggressive’ competition from Morocco, speculation from traders and middlemen in the chain.

US food prices surprisingly stable

In January, inflation rates for major food groups were well above the national average. Since then, the rates for products such as fruits, vegetables and meat, have fallen steadily to near zero percent.

California agriculture controls much of Indiana’s winter food prices; and with El Nino expecting to bring much needed rain and snow to the area, inflation could drop even more.

Purdue agriculture economist Chris Hurt was shocked inflation rates fell so much due to the continued drought in California. “I think right now the prospects for food production in California looks positive, and that should help keep our costs of those food product very moderate going forward the next six months to a year,” said Hurt. “What we’ve seen so far on fruits and vegetables is basically unchanged, a surprise really. At the start of the year, we were anticipating the drought damage in California to raise fruit and vegetable prices.”

Fruits and vegetables were expected to take a big hit, but has dropped from 2.3 percent to near zero percent.

“What we’ve seen so far this year is very moderate food inflation. Total cost of food is only up around 1.6 percent,” explained Hurt. “As consumers, we are seeing growth in income; and on average will be more than the cost of inflation of food.”

For farmers, this is tough, as prices are below price of production. But for consumers, it’s a relief on the wallet.

If California receives the anticipated rain and snow, Hurt said consumers should expect these prices to last through the start of 2016.

Greek farmers sign petition against new tax hikes

A petition signed by farmers across Greece regarding government plans to raise their taxes was expected to be handed to SYRIZA deputies in their constituencies over the weekend.

Drawn up by the Farmers Initiative, the petition was signed by 62 local farmers’ associations.

While a second round of prior actions the government is required to fulfill for the next tranche of bailout funding to be released did not include tax hikes on farmers, the latter said new measures were in the pipeline.

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

Sitaram Yechury’s Speech in Parliament on November 27, 2015

30 Monday Nov 2015

Posted by raomk in CPI(M), Current Affairs, Left politics, NATIONAL NEWS

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ambedkar, Constitution, Parliament, SITARAM YECHURY

DISCUSSION ON COMMITMENT TO INDIA’S CONSTITUTION AS PART OF 125TH BIRTH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION OF DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR  Contd..

SHRI ARUN JAITLEY (CONTD.): So, if Dr. Ambedkar had today stood up and proposed this provision, how would this House have reacted? ..[In Hindi]

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: These are Directive Principles. You know as much as I know. These are Directive Principles. Do not stretch that argument to such a level.

MR. CHAIRMAN: Let the hon. Speaker continue.

SHRI ARUN JAITLEY: We will go beyond Directive Principles now…[In Hindi]  “The State shall endeavour to organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall, in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter, of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle.” So if Dr. Ambedkar had proposed Article 44 and Article 48 today, how many of you would have accepted it, as Shri Sitaram Yechury says, even as a Directive Principle? …[In Hindi]

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: .[In Hindi] Dr. Ambedkar gave primacy to equality, life, liberty and dignity, the Fundamental Rights.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Mr. Jaitley, if you don’t mind, I wish to make a point. You see, you have quoted article 44. You just go to article 43A. It says, ‘…by suitable legislation…to secure the participation of workers in the management of undertakings,…’ Has that been done? Look at article 45. It says, ‘The State shall endeavour to provide early childhood care and education…’ Has that been done? Then, go to article 46. It talks about promotion of educational and economic interests of SCs, STs and other weaker sections…(Interruptions)…But, you choose one article 44 and another article 48…(Interruptions)…What about providing special care? What about providing all these?

MR. CHAIRMAN: Sitaramji, please, do it when your turn comes. …(Interruptions)…

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: So, don’t pick and choose. That is what I am saying…(Interruptions)…

SHRI ARUN JAITLEY: I think, I am glad that my friend Sitaram’s best argument is that we must have equality in the matter of not following the law, because one provision has not been followed the other should not be followed.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Sir, I am saying you should follow the entire law…(Interruptions)…No, you are not following the entire law. …(Interruptions)…

MR. CHAIRMAN: I would request all the concerned to allow the discussion…(Interruptions)…

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Why are you picking and choosing, Sir? That is my point…(Interruptions)…

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY (WEST BENGAL): Sir, thank you for giving me this opportunity. ..[In Hindi] So, what we wanted was enactments of all the legislations on the basis of which we can carry forward the vision of social justice that Dr. Ambedkar stood for. Now, instead, we have a situation where the Government has come forward saying that we reaffirm our faith in the Constitution. Where is the question of reaffirming? You are here, I am here, and all of us are here on an oath on this Constitution. What is this drama of reaffirming? If the Constitution is not there, then, you won’t be here. The Government of the day must know, the Leader of the House — he is not here now — should know that they are there only because we affirm this Constitution. What is this question of now saying, “We will reaffirm”? And what is this Constitution Day, Sir?….

Go through the history. On 26th of November this Constitution was signed by the President of the Constituent Assembly. It was voted upon and the draft was adopted and in the draft you have said explicitly ‘that on the26th of January India shall be a Republic in 1950 when this draft will turn into a Constitution and we shall enact.’ Can this Government answer? I want our esteemed lawyer, the Leader of the House, to tell us what law governed India from 26th of November, 1949 to 26th of January, 1950? Was it this Constitution? Is it known, Sir? The law that governed India during those two months after you adopted this Constitution was India Independence Act, 1947 moved by the British Prime Minister Attlee in the House of Commons in London. What is this Constitution then? You were under the British law for these two months. You adopted and enacted this Constitution on the 26th of January. Now, what is this new thing that you are finding now 65 years later on the Constitution Foundation Day? You please explain to me, Sir. You are sitting on the Chair. Maybe, you have greater knowledge, but you please explain to me that when Dr. Ambedkar himself says that on 26th of January we are enacting this Constitution and we shall be a Republic, what is this 26th November? Yes, that day the Constituent Assembly adopted this draft, but that was not the Indian Constitution yet. That was not the law of our land yet. It became the law of the land on the 26th of January, 1950. Lawyers are talking like this, Sir, on the Constitution Foundation day! You want some day or the other to find yourself so that you can celebrate one more event. The Constituent Assembly met again on the 24th and 25th of January, 1950. The Jana Gana Mana as the National Anthem was adopted on the 24th of January and on the 24th and 25th all Members of the Constituent Assembly signed this Constitution and on the 26th of November only 15 out of the 395 clauses in our Constitution came into operation. Sir, 26th of January, 1950 was when the entire Constitution came into operation. So, what is this new item that we have, Sir? …(Interruptions)… You may call it item song or whatever. It is a new item now in the Indian Constitution. A senior leader of the ruling party has described our Prime Minister, charitable or uncharitable, I don’t know, it is up to their party to decide, he called him an excellent event manager. One event after another, London and after that Malaysia, after that Asia and after that Constitution Day and from tomorrow it will be Paris. They showed us an old film in my youth, “Paris ke range shyam”. That will be the event from tomorrow.

SHRI ANAND SHARMA: It cannot be in the name of a film.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: I don’t know. So, what is this event to event to event? What are we observing, Sir? I am sorry, but I think the entire, what in Hindi we call, garima of this House, of the Parliament is being undermined by these sorts of flippant events that are coming in. Yes, for 26th of November we have the highest respect for Dr. Ambedkar and for everybody else. Does this Government today know that Constituent Assembly began its work on a Resolution moved by Shri Jawaharlal Nehru called the ‘Objectives Resolution’? Does this Government know that out of the eleven sittings of the Constituent Assembly six of the sittings were devoted to the ‘Objectives Resolution’ and not to this draft? A majority of the discussions in the Constituent Assembly was on the objectives put forward by Shri Jawaharlal Nehru. Sir, that is our history. Yes, the victor always scripts the history.

SITARAM YECHURY (CONTD.): But, here, the victor is also trying to change the past history! Now, this is the history we have inherited. Like the hon. Leader of the House, I was also born after Independence. I think, many of us are born after Independence. And, for all of us, this is inherited history; this is our legacy. You cannot now tamper with that history and tell us a new history! Now, why this Constitution Day? I can only come to the conclusion that this is an attempt to try and worm their way into the national movement when they had no role to play at all. This is the way they want to worm themselves into the national movement and how they want to worm themselves I want to know.

How this order is given? Sir, it is a Gazette Notification saying that ‘it has been decided to celebrate 26th day of November every year as the Constitution Day.’ It is a Gazette Notification. If you want I will place it on the Table of the House. It is a notification in the Indian Gazette, dated 19th November. It is issued by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. Does the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment decide a national day to be observed every year?

AN HON. MEMBER: The hon. Minister is here.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Yes, I have noticed that hon. Minister is coming in here. Hon. HRD Minister was a good fried of mine before she became a Minister. After that she does not have time and she has got very onerous responsibilities. But, I just want to know how the Gazette Notification comes on 19th and the HRD Ministry issues a circular to schools on 10th of November saying ‘observe 26th November as the Constitution Day.’ This is a Gazette issued on 19th. What is happening, Sir. Items in Indian politics. That is the only thing I can say — events. You have event management. You want to worm into the national movement when you had no role. Here, I wish to put it on record the fact that often we have heard and we will hear also, I am sure, in the course of this discussion, the role of Communists, etc., in the Freedom Struggle. That is an old charge…
(Interruptions)…

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Sir, please don’t deduct the time of these interruptions from my time and start pressing the bell. Please don’t do that. The British Bombay Home Department, in 1942, during the Quit India Movement observed, “The Sangh has scrupulously kept itself within the law and in particular has refrained from taking part in the disturbances that broke out in August, 1942.” ..(Interruptions).. This is the record of the British Government. Now, Tarunji made a charge against the Communists. .[In Hindi].

“After large scale strikes in mills in Kanpur, Jamshedpur and Ahmedabad, a despatch from Delhi dated September 5, 1942, to the Secretary of State, in London, reported about the Communist Party of India: ‘the behaviour of many of CPI members proves what has always been clear, namely, that it is composed of anti-British revolutionaries.'”

This is the President of India telling this in the Central Hall of Indian Parliament.
(Interruptions)
…[In Hindi].  He read out Article 44 of the Constitution, Sir, which deals with it. I have the copy of the Constitution and this is the copy that belongs to the Chamber. So you cannot accuse me of any personal or fudged copy.
MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Do you think there are different copies of Constitution?

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: No, no. Sir. They may accuse me. They may accuse me, so I am reading out only from the Chamber’s copy. Even that is challenged. So you don’t argue for authentication; it is marked as Chamber’s Copy. It says, ‘the State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code.’ It was quoted. It was also quoted on the question of organisation of agricultural and animal husbandry. I pointed out then that these are Directive Principles of State Policy, which are not justifiable and enforceable, and these Directive Principles also have other things, Sir, which are not quoted. What do they say? They say, ‘the State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people.’ What did Babasaheb Ambedkar say? The same thing; that is Article 46. Article 47 says, ‘the State shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living.’ Isn’t it a shame that today, the largest number of children malnutritioned are in India? Isn’t it a shame that majority of the stunted children in the world are from India, today? This is the Constitutional Directive, Article 47. What has been done? You only pick and choose what you want to do and that is where the suspicion comes as to what is your actual motive. Here in the section on Fundamental Duties that are supposed to be enforceable — you please look at your copy in your hand, Sir — Article 51A says, ‘it shall be the duty of every citizen of India.’ If you read Article 51A (f), it says, ‘to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture.’ Is it the composite culture that we are preserving, Sir? I will come to that again. What does 51A(h) say? It says, ‘to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform.’ Sir, if we hear that Lord Ganesha was the creation of plastic surgery or Karna in the Mahabharata was the creation of stent technology and test tube babies, is that scientific temper? And it comes from no less than hon. Prime Minister. What is happening? What are you implementing? What are you wanting to implement and what not? You are only reviving the hardcore Hindutva agenda. Cow protection, you are wanting to revive. Then the entire question of equality of all citizens to liberty in life. He has quoted Article 30. He is not here, unfortunately, so I cannot request him also. He has quoted this Article 30 — you can also help me, Sir, in finding that Clause — and said that these are contradicted by Articles 29 and 30. Article 15 says, ‘the State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.’ This is Article 15, Fundamental Rights.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY (CONTD.): He says, “Articles 29 and 30 are in contradiction”. Sir, any lawyer would know, any right always comes with what is called reasonable restrictions. I hope, Mr. Parasaran is here; there is no right which does not come without reasonable restrictions. The reasonable restrictions through Article 15 have been detailed in Articles of the Constitution, 29 and 20, where the rights of the minorities to their religion are given. Minorities here meaning not only religious but also linguistic minorities. So, it is said, “This is a contradiction. Don’t we want to remove it?” What would Dr. Ambedkar say today if you were talking about this contradiction, about this Constitution? He would say precisely the same thing that the duties of a citizen would be the spread of tolerance, and not the spread of any one particular intolerant point of view. And that is the bone of contention today, Sir. I read in the media that hon. Home Minister saying that secularism is the word that was injected into the Constitution, and, therefore, that is the cause of all problems. He has also referred to, I believe, poor old Aamir Khan; our actor is getting lampooned. He said, “Ambedkar did not leave the country. But he stayed here and struggled”. And that is what Aamir Khan also said, Sir. He did not say that he is leaving. I am glad he is staying and struggling, and then you accuse them saying that Left is sponsoring all that. Thank you for putting all those people with us. Our tribe is increasing. That is what you are doing. …(Interruptions)… But remember, Ambedkar did not leave the country. He was a patriot. But, Ambedkar renounced Hinduism and embraced Buddhism. You remember that. You remember that, and why was that? That is where the intolerance issue comes in. Sir, these are matters again of history. You cannot erase it, and if you want the question of intolerance, take the same speech of Dr. Ambedkar of 25th November, which the hon. Leader of the House was quoting. This is the same speech, and what does Dr. Ambekar say? He was talking about ‘history will repeat itself’. “Will we lose our Independence again…”, hon. Leader of the House quoted that. After that, he did not quote the rest of it. What does it say? I am quoting from that Speech of Dr. Ambedkar. “Will history repeat itself”? That is, will we lose our Independence once again? “Will Indians place the country above their creed or will they place creed above the country, I did not know”. As the Leader of the House said, if Dr. Ambedkar was here today, what would he say? He would not pose this question. He will say, “Indians are being forced to place their creed above the country”. And that is the intolerance that is happening in the country today. Then, what did Dr. Ambedkar say? “But this much is certain — this is the speech, Sir, which was quoted in the morning — if the parties place creed above country, our Independence will be put in jeopardy a second time — after all the instances he gave, which were quoted by the leader — will be put in a jeopardy a second time and probably be lost forever. This eventuality we must all resolutely guard against. We must be determined to defend our Independence with the last drop of our blood”.

Today, when I stand up against this intolerance, I am doing exactly what Dr. Ambedkar asked us to do. Anybody who wants to say what Dr. Ambedkar said must be done, we will do exactly what Dr. Ambedkar asked us to do, i.e., raise ourselves against this sort of intolerance. This is the same Ambedkar in the same speech.

Then, we heard the question of social justice. The essential point of Dr. Ambedkar is missed out. I have quoted this a number of times in this august House, but I can’t stop myself from quoting this again.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY (CONTD.): Now, I quote it in the full. It says, “On 26th of January, 1950” – please note once again, it is the Constitution Day, the Republic Day – “we are going to enter into a life of contradictions. In politics, we will give equality and in social and economic life, we will have inequality. In politics, we will be recognizing the principle of ‘one man one vote’, ‘one vote one value’. In our social and economic life, we shall, by reason of our social and economic structures, continue to deny the principle of ‘one man one value’.” That is the contradiction. Then, he continues to say, “If we continue to deny it for long, we will do so only by putting our political democracy in peril. We must remove this contradiction at the earliest. Or else, those who suffer from this inequality will blow up the structure of political democracy that this Assembly has so labouriously built”. This is Dr. Ambedkar in the same speech. What is the situation today? A hundred multi-billionaires in our country, whose asset value is close to one-half of my country’s GDP. And, according to the latest census, ninety per cent of the households in my country, today, have an income of less than Rs. 10,000, a month. Is this contradiction being resolved or are you only accentuating it further? Are we discussing issues of how we should reduce the gap in this contradiction? Instead, every foreign trip, we find a new concession to foreign capital. Fifteen new areas have been opened up to the FDI. Free Trade Agreements are ruining our domestic cultivation of commercial crops! The agrarian distress is growing. Farmers are committing suicides. Your industrial production index, as per this Government’s own statistics, this month has shown a drop from about six per cent plus to about three per cent. Manufacturing has dropped to 2.4 per cent from over 6 per cent. Industrial production is declining. Agrarian distress is deepening. …[In Hindi]

Where are we on the social justice vision of Dr. Ambedkar? I have mentioned about the atrocities on SCs and STS and about reservation. On the question of growing inequalities, the condition of our people is deteriorating. What is this contradiction? You see the reality. Are we paying homage to Dr. Ambedkar? Is this the way Modern India is actually fulfilling the vision of social justice. Forget about the political parties. Forget to which party belong, to which party you belong. As an Indian, when you are talking about these things, are we being honest to ourselves? Are we doing justice to Dr. Ambedkar and all of that generation – Nehru, Gandhi, Abul Kalam Azad, Sardar Patel – that gave us Independence and this Constitution? What had they exhorted all of us to do? Are we doing it? And, you say, “I reaffirm my faith in the Constitution.” Without reaffirming that faith, you won’t be here. What is this reaffirming of faith? Come to the federalism. What did Dr. Ambedkar say on federalism?

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Please try to conclude.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Yes, Sir. But how can I conclude federalism and intolerance and all that? …(Interruptions)… You are asking to conclude what the Government is doing.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY (CONTD.): In a federal structure, on CentreState relations, what did Dr. Ambedkar say? He said that the Centre and the States are coequal in this matter. Sir, I am reading from the same speech. “It is difficult to see how such a Constitution can be called centralism. That is, the basic principle of fedearlism is that the legislative and executive authority is partitioned between the Centre and the States, not by any law to be made by the Centre but by the Constitution itself.” That is the essence of this Constitution. Is the principle of federalism followed, Sir? You are talking about the misuse of Article 356. That is only one part of it. We, the Kerala Government, were the first victim of Article 356, way back in the 1950s. I don’t know how many of you were there. Second time, we were victim in 1960s; twice, we were victim in Bengal, in 1967 and 1969. …(Interruptions)..

SHRI T.K. RANGARAJAN: Mr. Antony is here. He was the hero.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Hon. Antony is here. He was a hero of one of the… (Interruptions).. But, Sir, all that apart, what is fedearalism? Not merely equality, that independent respect of the States, are we granting it today? Then, you talked of judiciary. Let me tell you, what Dr. Ambedkar said about judiciary is very, very interesting. I am quoting from the same speech, ” Courts may modify, they cannot replace”, please note, “Courts may modify, they cannot replace, they can revise earlier interpretations as new arguments, new points of view are presented. They can shift the dividing line in marginal cases, but there are barriers they cannot pass, definite assignments of power they cannot reallocate. They can give a broadening construction of existing powers, but they cannot assign to one authority powers explicitly granted to another.” The separation and the complementarity of the Executive, the Judiciary and the Legislature are hallmarks of our Constitution. Now, this is as far as your Judiciary is concerned. But what worries me about is you are paying homage to Dr. Ambedkar. Remember, Sir, from 1946 to 1950, what was the condition of the world? Millions of people were under colonial subjugation. When these countries became independent, what we did in India was, actually, a revolutionary step then. We granted universal adult suffrage, which nobody else of these countries granted. …(Interruptions).. Europe did not grant and not even the United States of America. President Obama came here. All of us were very excited in the Central Hall, both sides. Everybody was saying, wah wah, President Obama came here, and, then, he wrote in the Golden Book — there is no gold in that book — of our Parliament, “Greetings from the world’s oldest democracy to the world’s largest.” This was his message. Yes, this was the message he gave. I had to point it out later that evening at the President’s banquet. I said, “Sir, I think, this is a wrong definition that you are the world’s oldest democracy.” He said, “Why’? I said, “Sir, you got the right to vote, that is, American-Africans, universally in the United States of America in 1962, one year after you were born. The universality of adult franchise in the United States of America came only in 1962; in India, we gave it in 1950.” Whether you are a dalit, you are a landlord, whether you are a Muslim, whether you are a Hindu, we gave it in 1950. And, today, Sir, what is happening? In Haryana, 86 per cent of the people will be kept out of their right to vote and right to contest elections because of various conditions. The State Government has said that unless you fulfil these conditions, you cannot contest or you cannot vote.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY (CONTD.): In Rajasthan, you put conditions whereby more than half the people are excluded from the universal suffrage. In Gujarat, you have said, ‘unless you have a toilet, a pucca toilet, in your house, you cannot vote or contest in local elections’. All these three States have got a BJP State Government. You come here to pay homage to Dr. Ambedkar and the one important thing that has been done by the Indian Constitution on universal adult suffrage, you deny it to people in the States which have a State Government that is led by the BJP. …(Time-bell)…

Sir, I know you will press the bell. But the point is that you please consider all these things. The Ruling Benches are empty. I don’t know who will convey, what and to whom when the reply comes on Monday.

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: The Ministers are there. …(Interruptions)… They will do it. …(Interruptions)…

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Sir, I sympathize with my friend, Shri Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi. How much burden can he carry, Sir? How much can he go and report upstairs saying that this is all that has been said and you please answer that? And, even the officers have deserted the officials’ block. So, I don’t know if anybody is taking note of all this. We understand many of these things. They ignore us normally. …(Interruptions)…

AN HON. MEMBER: This shows their commitment.

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: But, Sir, since you are pressing the bell, let me come down to my final points. The Leader of the House made an interesting and a very interesting reference to the Third Reich and Germany. Wonderful, Sir. We are happy, and I must pay my gratitude to the Leader of the House for having reminded me of the Third Reich and Germany and the dangers of authoritarianism. Sir, in 1939, when the debate in the country was going on as to what should be the character of Independent India, there was a book, which was not thought that it would be very important but a book which had a very, very important implication for Indian politics and India’s future, and that was a book called ‘We, or our Nationhood Defined’ by Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar. He is called the RSS Guru. And, since the Leader of the House mentioned the Third Reich, I only want to quote from that book about the Third Reich. That book is, ‘We, or Our Nationhood Defined’. Who is ‘we’? In Hindi ‘Swaraj.’ ..[In Hindi]  That is the entire import of that book..he talked saying that ‘only Hindus and Hindus alone are inhabitants of this country’. And, then, what does he say about the Third Reich? I am quoting, “To keep up the purity of the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by purging the country of the semitic Races, the Jews”. I will take a break here, Sir, for a moment. You please draw the parallels in India — who is that instead of the Jews and who is that for the Race and the culture and its purity. I continue with the quote. “Race pride at its highest has been …” …(Interruptions)…

SHRI V.P. SINGH BADNORE: Sir, which book is he referring to? …(Interruptions)…

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: From which book are you quoting? …(Interruptions)…

SHRI ANAND SHARMA: He is quoting from scriptures of your party. …(Interruptions)…

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: You say from which book you are quoting. …(Interruptions)…
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Sir, my good friend, Mr. V.P. Singh Badnore, may not be so much in tune with the RSS as he is a BJP M.P. But let me tell him that the name of the book is: ‘We, or Our Nationhood Defined’. I am quoting from page no. 35. This book was published in 1939 by Bharat Prakashan, republished by Bharat Prakashan, Second Edition, again in 1944. That is the authenticity. That book must be available in library if it is not already removed. I mean, they have this habit also of removing all these books. But otherwise, this book should be in the Parliament library. Otherwise, I will help you. I will give you a copy.
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY (contd.): Now, it is in this book, on page 35. I repeat that quote; it says, “To keep up the purity of the race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by purging the country of the semetic races, the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well nigh impossible it is for races and cultures having differences going to the root to be assimilated into one united whole. A good lesson for us..” Please understand this.

SHRI V. P. SINGH BADNORE: We cannot do that. That is why! What is that commentary?…(Interruptions)… We cannot do it. What is wrong in it? …(Interruptions)…
SHRI TAPAN KUMAR SEN: He is not saying anything wrong. Why are you getting agitated? …(Interruptions)…

SHRI V. P. SINGH BADNORE: We cannot do that. That is why he has said so. What is wrong in that?…(Interruptions)…

SHRI TAPAN KUMAR SEN: He is not saying anything wrong, Mr. V.P. Singh. …(Interruptions)…

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Sir, let me complete. …(Interruptions)… Sir, let me complete. ..(Interruptions)…

SHRI V. P. SINGH BADNORE: We cannot do that. That is why he has said…(Interruptions)… What is wrong with that? …(Interruptions)… What is he trying to do? …(Interruptions)….

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Please, you would get a chance. You may reply to that; you would get your chance….(Interruptions)…. You can reply to that. You would get your chance. You say that he is misinterpreting. When you get your chance, you may correct it. …(interruptions)…

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: I am quoting verbatim. And if you want, shall I re-quote the whole thing?
MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: No, no; there is no need for that. It is all on record. …(Interruptions)….
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Have you followed so far?

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Yes, yes. Now, you need to conclude also. There is no time. …(Interruptions)…

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Sir, let me conclude with just one sentence – “A good lesson for us in Hindustan to learn and profit by.” This is about the Third Reich that the hon. Leader of the House was reminding us about.

SHRI V. P. SINGH BADNORE: We thought this is wrong. That is why we…(Interruptions)

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Now, please conclude. …(Interruptions)…
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: This is exactly what this Hindu Rashtra is all about, Sir. That is why, if you want to pay homage and our shraddhanjali to Dr. Ambedkar, please remember what he said in the speech finally. I would like to quote to you what he said about creed: “Without equality, you cannot have liberty. Without fraternity, you cannot have equality and liberty. Without equality and fraternity – fraternity means sadbhavna – …you cannot have liberty.” If you are celebrating India’s freedom and its liberty, equality and fraternity are the two things on which there can be no compromise. And that is precisely what is being compromised in this furtherance of the atmosphere of intolerance.
Sir, finally, let me end by quoting Dr. Rajendra Prasad. When he was about to put his signatures on this draft, the future President of India, quoted these lines. He was not yet the President of India; he became the President of India only on the 26th of January and, then, it was said that the Governor General, Dr. Rajagopalachari, cannot administer an oath to our President because the Governor General is an appointee of the British. So, the Chief Justice was called, in this Central Hall, and he administered the oath. After that Dr. Rajendra Prasad administers the oath for an interim  Government, adopts this Constitution, administers the oath and directs that under this new Constitution, fresh elections be held after delimitation is completed. That election was held in 1952. And today, we hear, Sir, that Sardar Patel was being denied from being India’s first Prime Minister. Unfortunately, poor Sardar died in 1950; the first election was in 1952. .(Interruptions). Is that understood, Sir? Now, if there is some magic and some tantra through which like Lord Ganesha somebody who is dead and gone can be brought back alive, unfortunately, to be the Prime Minister, I can understand! That apart, what did Dr. Rajendra Prasad say? I am quoting this and ending, Sir. Dr. Rajendra Prasad, in his address, hailing that we adopted this Constitution, says, “After all, a Constitution, like a machine, is a lifeless thing.”

SHRI SITARAM YECHURY (CONTD.): “…It acquires life because of the men who control it and operate it. India needs today nothing more than a set of honest men who will have the interest of the country before them.” I am sure when Dr. Rajendra Prasad and Dr. Ambedkar talked about ‘men’, they included the ‘women’ also. So, please don’t take offence; I am sure, at that time, women were also part of it. “There is a fissiparous tendency arising out of various elements in our life”, said Dr. Rajendra Prasad on November 26, 1949. He said, “We have communal differences, caste differences, language differences, provincial differences and so forth. It requires men of strong character, men of vision, men who will not sacrifice the interests of the country at large for the sake of smaller groups and areas and who will rise over the prejudices which are born out of these differences. We can only hope that the country will throw up such men in abundance.” Is that the case? I rest my case by asking you the question. What are we seeing today? Have we produced such men in abundance? If not, I think it is time to correct the notion. If you want to do actual reaffirmation to our Constitution and pay our homage to Dr. Ambedkar, …(Interruptions)…

MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN: Okay.
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Please don’t okay me here, Sir, you will also be a part of it. All of us will have to sincerely pay homage to this, and that is what we need to do. Thank you, very much for giving me time. (Ends)

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

Argentina tango right

30 Monday Nov 2015

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, Left politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Argentina, Right

Marco Consolo – http://marcoconsolo.altervista.org/ –

Celebrates the right of Argentina and the continental. With a difference of less than 3% and a narrow margin of 700,000 votes, the ballot wins its candidate, Mauricio Macri, the “Argentine Berlusconi”, who beat Daniel Scioli, the candidate of the Frente para la Victoria who somehow represented the continuism (51.6% to Macri, Scioli to 48.3%, 22% abstention). The settlement of Macri is scheduled for Dec. 10. It ‘the first time since 1998, when Hugo Chavez won the elections in Venezuela, that the ballot box to the right riconsegnano the government of a country that was looking for an alternative.

Decisive factor in the victory was the vote of Peronism conservative, that the first round had voted for Sergio Massa’s reach third. Sniffed the air, Massa had asked for a sign of “change”, implicitly guaranteeing its support “critical” to the right of Macri who managed to add up the votes of an important part of the conservative electorate Peronism. Massa today provides the elect in the different provinces and its votes in Parliament.
In the result has also played support for the right to be part of “social democrats” Unión Cívica Radical, past and barrel with his right from the first round .

The reasons for the defeat

A defeat expected with multiple causes. First, the erosion of consensus after 12 years of uninterrupted management with several errors, a high inflation that eroded the purchasing power of wages, some high-profile cases of corruption, the difficulty in responding to attacks by international powers, the need to the face of internal contradictions, its a process of transformation, a style of self-government.

The decisive factor was the ongoing offensive of the mass media (international and Argentine) against the government and against the Anti-monopoly on the media, with the group  Clarin  in the front row. The government failed to dismantle the “narrative” of “media latifundia”, which took for granted a win Macri (with a distance of less than 16 points), convincing the most conservative sectors that the “game was over.” Later, the political right will return the favor in the media: the Law on Media will be another of the objectives of the conservative restoration.
It certainly working against the government the international crisis, whose impact on Latin American economies has meant, among ‘ another, having to review the implementation of social plans and redistributive.

Important chapter is the new “middle class”, who voted for change (as in Brazil) despite the obvious improvement of their living conditions and purchasing power. It ‘a fact that is repeated in several countries of the continent and that should give pause. In the Argentine case, in recent decades the behavior of the middle class has fluctuated between radical positions and periods reactionaries, even pro-coup. But more generally, the lesson of the polls is not just pull out of poverty amp sectors of the population for electoral support. The new middle class has embraced the social achievements, highlighted by increased consumption capacity. Do not you think you can really go back, because recent years have convinced him of the irreversibility of processes. Not only. In many cases, the new middle class claims for itself the resources allocated to pro-poor in a “war between the ex-poor and still poor.”

Last but not least  , the candidate of the outgoing government, Daniel Scioli, governor for a short while in the Province of Buenos Aires, disliked by the more militant sectors of “Kirchnerism” for its management and its moderate constraints passed by former President Carlos Menem . A candidate with little charisma, whose image is closer to the Peronism of the past years, that the “Kirchnerism” the twenty-first century. And Cristina Fernandez preferred to keep a safe distance dall’agone election. But in these 12 years, both Nestor, Cristina that have failed to make room for any successor, can represent a credible and successful. A choice which has weighed various sectors who have decided to vote in white, despite Scioli has recovered about 3 million votes from the first round.
And that’s the worst predictions of the vigil have come true without surprises. The sensational  performance of Macri in the first round, had alerted the militants “kirchneristi” who led a generous campaign door to door, of which Argentina had no recent memories. But it was not enough. The 12-year rule “Kirchner” (Before Nestor Kirchner and Cristina Fernandez after his death) were not enough to consolidate an organized social base that would guarantee the continuity of the social transformations of Argentina.

The modern face of the right

In line with the suggestions of the  spin doctors  of the  marketing  election, Macri reinvented itself. He did everything possible to alienate itself from the image of the right of “dinosaurs coup” of the past, the “gravedigger” of social achievements, presenting a sign of strength captivating name  “Cambiemos” . During the campaign he had to recognize some positive transformations of the government of Cristina Fernandez, coming to claim to “believe in the role of a strong state.” But true to the motto of veltroni “but also …”, during the election campaign promised state and market, and multinational homeland. A devaluation of the currency, the elimination of state subsidies to transport electricity, gas, and a cut in social programs generalized in favor of the poor. In other words, the view of the future is that of a fall in the purchasing power of wages.

And a few hours after the election results, it promised that the economy will be led by a group of “6 technicians”, stressing the need to deal with the “Fondos Buitre”, to recover the “competitiveness required” for the country’s economy .
gloating the “financial markets” and especially the “vulture funds”, which, thanks to a US judge complacent, they put a heavy burden on their stratospheric profits to buy at bargain prices of external debt and that they never wanted to accept the proposed restructuring of government debt.

In danger are also policies in defense of Human Rights, one of the flags of the government, with hundreds of trials of military and civilian leaders of the genocide of the dictatorship and which today organize their revenge.

Macri complex for the parliamentary framework, which has no majority either in the House, nor the Senate (the latter in the hands of “Kirchnerism”). But it controls many of the most important provinces, including that of Buenos Aires, the largest in the country, the former Peronist stronghold which concentrates almost 40% of voters, conquered in the first round just to Daniel Scioli.

Peronism in dispute

There is no doubt that the election result opens the dispute over control and representation of the Justicialista Party, the Peronist party, historic tank in electoral terms, of power, cronyism and consensus.
In the runoff, the real surprise was the vote Cordoba, in the hands of the Peronist governor José Manuel de la Sota, who guaranteed to Macri almost 70% of the votes in the province, making a lot of difference in the final result.
The two figures emerging today seem so those of Sergio Massa (real balance of power) and that of Jose Manuel De la Sota. Both states support “critical” to the government of Macri and counting on several MPs. It is not to be discarded that some deputy elected with Massa may swell the ranks of “macrismo.”
As is known, in the past the complex phenomenon Peronist had the ability to hold together conflicting options and grinding each other (by the radical left of the “Montoneros” , until the death squads of the “Triple A”) and the figure of Juan Domingo Peron and Evita has represented the historical glue. Nestor Kircher first and then with Cristina Fernandez, in the Peronism was born a sort of “third way”, with the attempt to build the wing “Kirchner” with mass organizations, especially among young people.
The main unknown concerns precisely those organizations, grown in the 12-year rule. The sectors most militants had twisted my mouth on the candidacy of Scioli, and until the last maintained a critical position. It will be to see if they can withstand the impact of displacement from positions of power guaranteed by the umbrella of the government, “Kirchner”. And if the trade union movement, strongly divided, unable to regain its leading role autonomous from the government.

The international framework

The result will have an impact on the political landscape of Latin America in the last 15 years characterized by the presence of progressive and leftist governments, which had bet on unity and regional integration, the United States moving away from the orbit.
Although pragmatically says it will continue to do business with China, Macri confirmed its wish to reconnect the United States (and Israel, with an eye to the important Jewish community of the country) to the International Monetary Fund, and his beloved friends such as former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, ( who described him as “a hope for all Latin Americans … who need brilliant leaders”), the  Partido Popular  of Spain Rajoy, and the Venezuelan opposition, at his side during the election campaign.
The new President has reiterated that he will ask the withdrawal of Venezuela from Mercosur, accused of failing to respect the so-called “Democratic Clause” to “abuses against opponents and freedom of expression.” A clause inspired by the one in force in the Organization of American States (OAS).
The clause provides for the possibility of sanctions as the total or partial closure of land borders, suspension or limitation of trade, air traffic and shipping, communications, administration of energy and services.
The frontal attack on Venezuela has come in recent days by the same OAS that “Che” Guevara defined as “Ministry of Colonies” of the United States. The current Secretary General, the Uruguayan Luis Almagro, a few days ago attacked heavily Venezuelan electoral authorities, provoking public distancing former President “Pepe” Mujica.
The right-wing Latin American (and the US) now they aim to expand to the maximum “the domino effect” across the continent, starting from the upcoming elections in Venezuela on December 6, and then stick to the bottom of the government of Dilma Rousseff in Brazil. And as others. Mala tempora currunt  for transformation processes in Latin America. There is little discussion of the past neo-liberal, with old answers to new questions. Young people have not known nor dictatorship, nor the long neo-liberal night. Today, the key lies in the future, which promises to be turbulent.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity

30 Monday Nov 2015

Posted by raomk in BJP, Communalism, Current Affairs, Filims, Opinion

≈ Leave a comment

“Don’t pull me into trouble.”Those were the exact, damning words that Oscar-winning music composer A.R Rahman uttered, when asked to comment on the furore that followed Aamir Khan’s rema

Source: Dear Offended India, Aamir Khan Is Not A Star Because Of Your Charity

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

How climate change has sparked political and social unrest in Punjab this year

30 Monday Nov 2015

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Farmers, NATIONAL NEWS

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

climate, Farmers, Punjab, white fly

And what that tells us about how agriculture is faring in Punjab.
M Rajshekhar

How climate change has sparked political and social unrest in Punjab this year

Photo Credit: Munish Sharma/Reuters

The professor will not forget 2015 easily.

A scientist at Ludhiana’s Punjab Agriculture University, he has been studying cotton for 15 years. But what he saw this year was entirely unfamiliar.

It started with the rains. Punjab saw downpours during the normally dry months of March and April. It rained in June as well – a month when temperatures should have touched 47 degrees, with hot summer winds (the famous loo) gusting across the state.

Instead, the temperature stayed below 40 degrees on most days that month. On the days it did rise, said the scientist, who spoke to Scroll on the condition of anonymity, it did not cross 43 degrees.

More climatic strangeness followed. It barely rained in the traditional monsoon months of July and August. The first three weeks of September stayed dry as well, followed by heavy rains towards the end of the month.

The aberrant weather patterns catalysed a boom in whitefly – an insect that sucks sap from plants during its nymphal stage. And this triggered, among other things, a political crisis in Punjab.

Typically, whiteflies emerge around March and are active till winter sets in. Most years, they are a minor pest preying on most crops, their numbers kept in check by the loo and then the rains. This year, however, the skies stayed overcast but the earth saw little rain; temperatures stayed relatively low and humidity relatively high, creating conditions where whitefly numbers began rising earlier than usual – in June.

Crawling out of their eggs, the nymphs encountered a cotton crop that was more vulnerable than usual. The rains in March and April had delayed the winter harvest – the wheat crop took longer to ripen. This in turn delayed the sowing of cotton. “Due to the late sowing, the crop was just 1.5 months old when the Whiteflies came,” says the scientist. “Normally, it is about 3 months old, and therefore more robust.”

It was a perfect storm. Whiteflies live for about 24-30 days – a quicksilver lifespan in course of which eggs hatch into nymphs, nymphs change into pupas, and pupas become adult whiteflies which mate, lay eggs on crop leaves and die. This year, with favourable conditions lasting longer during the cotton crop, Punjab saw an explosion in their numbers.

The plants were swamped. As the nymphs sucked out the sap, the plants sickened.

What happened next was inevitable. Anywhere between two-fifths to two-thirds of Punjab’s cotton crop was damaged. By mid-October, about 15 farmers had killed themselves. A farmers’ agitation, demanding compensation from the state, began.

Pesticides failed to control the plague, giving rise to speculation that they were fake. The director of Punjab’s agriculture department and several pesticide dealers were duly arrested.

The unrest was building when reports began to proliferate about copies of the Guru Granth Sahib being desecrated in several parts of the Punjab. Public attention swung away from the failed cotton crop – and in the process, the state squandered a chance to understand why whitefly erupted this year.

Make no mistake – fake pesticides are not the primary reason the crop failed.

Start with the rains.

Why were the rains abnormal?

From his office in the Indian Meteorological Department’s red-brick building in Chandigarh’s Sector 39, Surender Paul, a director, has been witnessing large changes in the weather patterns over Punjab.

Punjab gets almost all its rainfall during the monsoon months. Over the last 15 years, said Paul, the state has “seen a decline in mean precipitation between June and September”. In the last ten years, it has seen six “meteorological droughts”, the term for when rainfall is at least 25% below normal.

Paul sees other changes. Historically, rains used to reach the state around June 30. They now arrive five days earlier. Their departure has been delayed as well. “The norm is September 30. But now, winds start blowing towards the south seven-eight days later than before.”

Rainfall is also getting concentrated across time and space. This year, most of the rainfall over Punjab occurred in just 10 days. “This is one of the patterns we are seeing – a few days of concentrated rainfall,” said Paul. At the same time, the state is seeing greater local variations in rain. This year, for instance, only six out of the 20 districts in the state got normal rainfall.

Paul’s work suggests these changes are manifestations of a new interaction between mid-latitude westerlies and India’s monsoons.

It’s like this: The monsoon originates to the south-west of India, over the Arabian Sea, and then moves north till the Himalayas, curving along India’s eastern coast before moving towards the low pressure area that develops over central India due to the summer heat.

As for the westerlies, these blow at a greater distance from the equator, starting from about 32 N (Latitude) – say, the northern tip of Punjab.

However, over the last ten years, the westerlies have been swinging farther south. This trend, said Paul, is seen mostly in the monsoon and winter months. In the last four or five years, they have reached as far south as 25 North – that is, the northern reaches of Madhya Pradesh. In the process, India is seeing greater interaction between the westerlies and the monsoon. “In the last ten years, the influence of extra-tropical weather has increased,” he said. “We have seen as many as 40 instances of western disturbances affecting the monsoons this year.”

It’s not yet clear why the westerlies are swinging south in recent years. What is incontrovertible, however, is that the monsoonal trough – the low pressure area which attracts monsoon clouds – is coming to depend on the interplay between the westerlies and the monsoon winds. The collision of the two, says Paul, results in the formation of a large cloud mass and an abrupt, short-lived but intense cloudburst. That is what India has seen this year in Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Rajasthan.

Elsewhere, rainfall tends to be low. With the monsoon clouds weakened, more rain falls on places that are more conducive for rainfall – like lakes and forests. The moisture they release into the air, says Paul, encourages precipitation.

All of this bodes ill for Punjab. The state’s industrial belt releases emissions that reduce the quantum of moisture in the air. Further, the state has no dense forest cover – less than 4% of the state is forested. States to its north and east have far higher forest cover.

The collapse of extension work

The change in rainfall patterns combined with another factor to create the crisis in Punjab’s cotton fields this year.

During the heyday of the green revolution in the 1970s and ’80s, Punjab had a large bureaucracy that transmitted agricultural knowhow to farmers – chief agricultural officers and gram sewaks in each district, doing what was called agricultural extension. There were also kisan melas at the block and district levels that disseminated knowhow about agriculture and technology – information on new crops, seeds, fertilisers, implements and pesticides – to farmers through camps and lectures.

The system does not work any more. There has been a 50%-60% reduction in the number of extension workers, scientists say. The remaining staff is often deputed for other work – like conducting local elections.

One fallout of the collapse of extension work? It hamstrung attempts to fight off whitefly.

Take Balwana village, about 12 kilometres from the agricultural town of Abohar. Here Jagdish Kumar, a young man in his thirties who runs a shop near the village gurudwara that sells agricultural inputs (fertilisers and pesticides), had a window seat to what happened once the whiteflies arrived.

First, the crisis was spotted late. “Farmers responded only when the whiteflies started flying over their field,” he said. “That is when they asked for medicine, saying, ‘Mujhe spray de do ki kal ko mujhe whitefly dikhai nahin de.’” Give me a medicine which will make sure there is not a single whitefly over my field tomorrow.

There are several problems with such a process, Kumar said. First, whitefly is at its most dangerous as a nymph, which is when it sucks away at the sap and enfeebles the plant. “The whitefly stage is not so harmful,” he said. “All that will happen is the insect will lay the next generation of eggs.”

Second, spraying the flies will not help if it is not coordinated. “All the flies have to do is move to an adjoining field where spraying is not yet underway,” he noted.

Third, the lack of information about the emergent weather patterns meant that the farmers did not spray their fields for a long time. As the Met department noticed, the weather stayed overcast with minor drizzles. This made farmers reluctant to spray  “Companies tell farmers that fields should stay dry for four-six hours after spraying,” Jagdish said. “And the spray is costly – Rs 1,800/litre. Since farmers were never sure when it would rain, they deferred spraying.”

So the eggs grew undisturbed into mites, with concentrations per leaf much higher than before; the plants weakened and their leaves turned black. Which is when, Kumar said, desperate farmers began looking for medicines – “sprays, synthetics, anything”.

Take Hazara Ram of Balwana. The farmer, now in his sixties, sprayed four different pesticides in a bid to control his whitefly outbreak. None of them worked. His harvest was just 80 kilos from two acres, which netted him no more than Rs 4,000 – against which, he spent Rs 5,000 on pesticides alone.

Sukhdev Singhji. Credit: M Rajshekhar
In this part of India, it is the kharif crop – usually a cash crop like basmati or cotton – that introduces variability into farmers’ annual income. The winter crop, usually sold to the government at fixed rates, is more of a safety net. Like Hazara Ram, Sukhdev Singhji, a resident of Balwana village near Abohar, will not make any money on his cotton crop this year. He will make money only if wheat (kanak, in Punjabi) does well: “Kanak bachave to bachave.”

There is another issue here: Given that whitefly go through four stages – egg, nymph, pupa and adult – how did farmers like Ram know the stage of infection and therefore the appropriate medicines to spray?

They went by what agricultural traders or company agents – whose job is to sell pesticides – told them.

The rise of new ‘knowhow’

As Punjab’s extension machinery weakened, other actors stepped into the void – such as companies that sell fertiliser and pesticides. Said the Punjab Agriculture University scientist, “Their agents usually visit villages 15 days before the time of application. If the pesticide doesn’t work, they start working in another village. As it is, they are not even agri-graduates.”

Most of them are very young, said Sukhdev Singhji – “Navey munde. Unhey khud hi nahin pata honda.”

Another entrant into this informational vacuum is the adatiya, the agricultural trader. As an article in the November 7, 2015, issue of the Economic & Political Weekly, titled “Commission Agent System: Significance in Contemporary Agricultural Economy of Punjab”, notes: “They [adatiyas] have become the exploitative alternative for supply of credit, farm and domestic inputs as well as sale of produce. Not only do they provide credit for purchasing essential articles, but also push the farmers to purchase the same from the shops they, or their friends, own.”

One reason for their rise is the worsening economics of agriculture in Punjab.

Take cotton: It is mainly grown in the southern reaches of Punjab, in the Malwa region. On the whole, this is the poorest of the three regions of the state, and the one that sees the most farmer suicides.

Villages in south-western Punjab’s Malwa region are far poorer than villages elsewhere in Punjab.
Credit: M Rajshekhar

Bt Cotton came here in 2004, in response to the American bollworm attacks that started in 1997. Sukhpal Singh, head of Punjab Agricultural University’s Department of Economics and Sociology, points out that since then, though farmer incomes have risen, their debt has not come down.

There are several reasons for this, Singh said. While Bt Cotton was resistant to bollworm, after about seven or eight years of normalcy, attacks from secondary pests started. At the same time, input costs began rising faster than output prices. “It was partly globalisation. Subsidy on input prices was reduced. Diesel and machinery and seeds got costlier. At the same time, international cotton prices fell.”

This is a story that is playing out all across Punjab. As the cost of agriculture rises and its profitability falls, Punjab’s farmers are being pushed into debt – 89% of all farming households are in debt, according to this EPW paper. They borrow from the adatiyas. When the harvest comes in, they give the crop to the adatiyas who sell it, recover the loan, and give the balance to the farmers.

And so, when whiteflys came, most farmers turned to the traders seeking pesticides. The EPWpaper estimates that 15.01% of pesticides in Punjab (across all crops) are now supplied from the shops of commission agents, and another 80% are procured from the shops owned by people connected to these agents. They, says the paper, issue “a “slip” to farmers for obtaining items from their “owned or connected shops”.

The fungicide that Singhji applied to his cotton fields. Credit: M Rajshekhar
This further compromised farmers’ efforts against whiteflies. There was now the added risk that the traders (who are not farmers) might recommend the wrong pesticide, or one with a greater margin, or that farmers might buy cheaper pesticides to keep their debt low.

Agreed the scientist, “Extension work has collapsed. Paisa nahin hain. Udhaar lena hain. Sasti kaun si hain?”

Singhji, for instance, sprayed a fungicide while trying to take on whitefly.

That won’t work, said Jagdish, the young shop-owner of Balwana, pointing out that farmers sprayed unthinkingly. “Decide kuch nahin kiya, jo mila woh daal diya,” he said. They sprayed whatever they could get.

Other farmers underestimated the whitefly crisis and either sprayed the right medicine too late, or used a milder pesticide than they should have. Matters were further complicated by perennial factors like fake pesticides and batch variations. “I see a farmer’s plot after spraying and if there is no change a day later, I send that batch of spray back,” said Jagdish.

That is the arithmetic of this moment. It’s telling that farmers held off spraying as long as the skies stayed overcast – it shows that farmers’ knowhow is static in a world that is changing fast. The state needs to work on mitigation and adaptation. And for that, it needs to prepare its farmers better.

“Our outreach has to be strengthened,” said Surinder Paul of the Met department. “The information is there. But not all farmers are getting it.”

Failing that, the state will only see the turmoil in its farmlands increase.

This article appeared in scroll.in

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

COUNTERVIEW: “Worrying” signs: Private sector capex plans decline 11%, corporate profits down 0.05%: Reliance think-tank expert

29 Sunday Nov 2015

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Economics, NATIONAL NEWS

≈ Leave a comment

Key sectors such as infrastructure, energy, metals, cement, automobiles, pharmaceuticals, and textiles, showed 4 per cent decline in capital expenditure for 2015-16

Source: COUNTERVIEW: “Worrying” signs: Private sector capex plans decline 11%, corporate profits down 0.05%: Reliance think-tank expert

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

“The housing crisis is insane”: 6 cities where homelessness is out of control – Salon.com

29 Sunday Nov 2015

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, USA

≈ Leave a comment

Seven years after the Great Recession, 565,000 are living on the streets — as many as a quarter of them children

Source: “The housing crisis is insane”: 6 cities where homelessness is out of control – Salon.com

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • బ్రిక్, బ్రిక్స్, బ్రిక్స్ ప్లస్.. అమెరికా ఆధిపత్యానికి ప్రతిఘటన!
  • ఏఐ డేటా సెంటర్లు.. అభివృద్ధి పేరుతో పర్యావరణ ముప్పు
  • భగవత్‌ సుభాషితాలు – ఆచరణలో విరుద్ధతలు!
  • పనిచేయని మోడినోమిక్స్, భారతీయ విజ్ఞానం, చంద్రబాబు, పవన్ కల్యాణ్ భజనలు వృధా – ప్రపంచ ఫ్యాక్టరీగా చైనా మరింత ముందుకు !
  • ఆర్థిక వృద్ధి కంటే అసమానతల పెరుగుదలే ఎక్కువ!

Recent Comments

SIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunturu's avatarSIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunt… on రాముడి సొమ్ము స్వాహా దర్యాప్తు…
Venugopalrao Nagumothu's avatarVenugopalrao Nagumot… on అసంబద్ద వాదనలు, అడ్డగోలు మాటలు…
Sk mahesh gupta's avatarSk mahesh gupta on శనగ రైతుల సంక్షోభం
pscknr's avatarpscknr on ఆడంతే నమ్మక ద్రోహి అన్న ఇరాన్‌…
pscknr's avatarpscknr on చైనాతో వాణిజ్యంపై ఆందోళన…

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015

Categories

  • Africa
  • AP
  • AP NEWS
  • Asia
  • BJP
  • BRS
  • CHINA
  • Communalism
  • Congress
  • COUNTRIES
  • CPI(M)
  • Current Affairs
  • Economics
  • Education
  • employees
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Farmers
  • Filims
  • Germany
  • Greek
  • Gujarat
  • Health
  • History
  • imperialism
  • INDIA
  • International
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS
  • Japan
  • Latin America
  • Left politics
  • Literature.
  • Loksabha Elections
  • NATIONAL NEWS
  • Opinion
  • Others
  • Pensioners
  • Political Parties
  • Politics
  • Prices
  • Readers News Service
  • RELIGION
  • Religious Intolarence
  • RUSSIA
  • Science
  • Social Inclusion
  • Sports
  • STATES NEWS
  • tdp
  • TDP
  • Telangana
  • Telugu
  • UK
  • Uncategorized
  • USA
  • WAR
  • Women
  • Women
  • Ycp

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • బ్రిక్, బ్రిక్స్, బ్రిక్స్ ప్లస్.. అమెరికా ఆధిపత్యానికి ప్రతిఘటన!
  • ఏఐ డేటా సెంటర్లు.. అభివృద్ధి పేరుతో పర్యావరణ ముప్పు
  • భగవత్‌ సుభాషితాలు – ఆచరణలో విరుద్ధతలు!
  • పనిచేయని మోడినోమిక్స్, భారతీయ విజ్ఞానం, చంద్రబాబు, పవన్ కల్యాణ్ భజనలు వృధా – ప్రపంచ ఫ్యాక్టరీగా చైనా మరింత ముందుకు !
  • ఆర్థిక వృద్ధి కంటే అసమానతల పెరుగుదలే ఎక్కువ!

Recent Comments

SIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunturu's avatarSIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunt… on రాముడి సొమ్ము స్వాహా దర్యాప్తు…
Venugopalrao Nagumothu's avatarVenugopalrao Nagumot… on అసంబద్ద వాదనలు, అడ్డగోలు మాటలు…
Sk mahesh gupta's avatarSk mahesh gupta on శనగ రైతుల సంక్షోభం
pscknr's avatarpscknr on ఆడంతే నమ్మక ద్రోహి అన్న ఇరాన్‌…
pscknr's avatarpscknr on చైనాతో వాణిజ్యంపై ఆందోళన…

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015

Categories

  • Africa
  • AP
  • AP NEWS
  • Asia
  • BJP
  • BRS
  • CHINA
  • Communalism
  • Congress
  • COUNTRIES
  • CPI(M)
  • Current Affairs
  • Economics
  • Education
  • employees
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Farmers
  • Filims
  • Germany
  • Greek
  • Gujarat
  • Health
  • History
  • imperialism
  • INDIA
  • International
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS
  • Japan
  • Latin America
  • Left politics
  • Literature.
  • Loksabha Elections
  • NATIONAL NEWS
  • Opinion
  • Others
  • Pensioners
  • Political Parties
  • Politics
  • Prices
  • Readers News Service
  • RELIGION
  • Religious Intolarence
  • RUSSIA
  • Science
  • Social Inclusion
  • Sports
  • STATES NEWS
  • tdp
  • TDP
  • Telangana
  • Telugu
  • UK
  • Uncategorized
  • USA
  • WAR
  • Women
  • Women
  • Ycp

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Social

  • View mannem.koteswararao’s profile on Facebook
  • View mannemkoteswara’s profile on Twitter

Recent Posts

  • బ్రిక్, బ్రిక్స్, బ్రిక్స్ ప్లస్.. అమెరికా ఆధిపత్యానికి ప్రతిఘటన!
  • ఏఐ డేటా సెంటర్లు.. అభివృద్ధి పేరుతో పర్యావరణ ముప్పు
  • భగవత్‌ సుభాషితాలు – ఆచరణలో విరుద్ధతలు!
  • పనిచేయని మోడినోమిక్స్, భారతీయ విజ్ఞానం, చంద్రబాబు, పవన్ కల్యాణ్ భజనలు వృధా – ప్రపంచ ఫ్యాక్టరీగా చైనా మరింత ముందుకు !
  • ఆర్థిక వృద్ధి కంటే అసమానతల పెరుగుదలే ఎక్కువ!

Recent Comments

SIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunturu's avatarSIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunt… on రాముడి సొమ్ము స్వాహా దర్యాప్తు…
Venugopalrao Nagumothu's avatarVenugopalrao Nagumot… on అసంబద్ద వాదనలు, అడ్డగోలు మాటలు…
Sk mahesh gupta's avatarSk mahesh gupta on శనగ రైతుల సంక్షోభం
pscknr's avatarpscknr on ఆడంతే నమ్మక ద్రోహి అన్న ఇరాన్‌…
pscknr's avatarpscknr on చైనాతో వాణిజ్యంపై ఆందోళన…

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015

Categories

  • Africa
  • AP
  • AP NEWS
  • Asia
  • BJP
  • BRS
  • CHINA
  • Communalism
  • Congress
  • COUNTRIES
  • CPI(M)
  • Current Affairs
  • Economics
  • Education
  • employees
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Farmers
  • Filims
  • Germany
  • Greek
  • Gujarat
  • Health
  • History
  • imperialism
  • INDIA
  • International
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS
  • Japan
  • Latin America
  • Left politics
  • Literature.
  • Loksabha Elections
  • NATIONAL NEWS
  • Opinion
  • Others
  • Pensioners
  • Political Parties
  • Politics
  • Prices
  • Readers News Service
  • RELIGION
  • Religious Intolarence
  • RUSSIA
  • Science
  • Social Inclusion
  • Sports
  • STATES NEWS
  • tdp
  • TDP
  • Telangana
  • Telugu
  • UK
  • Uncategorized
  • USA
  • WAR
  • Women
  • Women
  • Ycp

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • vedika
    • Join 240 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • vedika
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d