• About
  • Farmers

vedika

~ your forum for critical and constructive writings

vedika

Category Archives: Economics

China fears, looming US data keep lid on grains

13 Wednesday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Economics, Farmers, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, Readers News Service

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Agriculture, China fears, USDA, world crop supply

Tuesdays are renowned in Chicago’s grain futures market for bringing turnarounds.

That is, reversing a strong price trend of the previous session.

But futures struggled for a decent reversal this time.

Monday’s poor performance by Chicago’s main contracts was followed by for corn and soybeans only modest gains, and in wheat further losses this time.

That said movement was not large – ahead of the slew of agricultural data expected later.

Hedge fund shorts

The prospect of such statistics – with the US Department of Agriculture unveiling its monthly Wasde world crop supply and demand report, and grain stocks and winter wheat sowings data, besides Brazil’s Conab unveiling a domestic crop briefing too – often leaves traders tinkering with their portfolios.

Estimates for US grain stocks data, Dec 1 and (year-ago figure)

Corn: 11.237bn bushels, (11.211bn bushels)

Range of forecasts: 11.073bn-11.44bn bushels

Soybeans: 2.72bn bushels, (2.528bn bushels)

Range of f’casts: 2.59bn-2.85bn bushels

Wheat: 1.698bn bushels, (1.53bn bushels)

Range of f’casts: 1.67bn-1.732bn bushels

Sources: USDA, Reuters

The surprise perhaps is that the prospect of the data has not spurred more significant short-covering rallies, given the extent of hedge funds’ bearish positioning on ags revealed by regulatory data released late on Friday to spur some short covering.

(Extreme positions, bullish or bearish, have a habit of spurring the closure of some of these holdings, and contrary price moves.)

“There’s a portion of the trade that is looking for a rally based on managed money being too extended on the short side,” said Benson Quinn Commodities.

“But this will likely not come to fruition until a bullish catalyst is noted.”

Lesson from history

Will the data later produce one?

Market forecasts for US winter wheat sowings data and (year-ago figure)

Hard red: 28.810m acres, (28.978m acres)

Range of f’casts: 27.576m-29.592m acres

Soft red: 7.144m acres, (7.87m acres)

Range of f’casts: 6.400m-8.539m acres

White: 3.366m acres, (3.396m acres)

Range of f’casts: 3.25m-3.50m acres

All winter: 39.32m acres, (39.461m acres)

Range of f’casts: 38.25m-40.796m acres

Sources: USDA, Reuters

There is in fact decent reason to expect that the winter wheat

sowings number that analysts expect, of 39.32m acres, may prove too large, with the low price of the grain potentially having spurred farmers to cut sowings by more than the 141,000 acres implied.

“Analysts expect only a modest decline, but we think there is a risk of a more significant decline,” said Tobin Gorey at Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

And, as Richard Feltes at Chicago broker RJ O’Brien noted, history shows there is a “strong tendency for the trade to overtestimate winter wheat area” compared with the USDA’s January estimates.

In fact, on data going back 27 years, the average trade guess has been above the actual number 23 times, by more than 500,000 acres on all but four of these occasions.

On 13 occasions, traders were too optimistic by more than 1.5m acres.

By contrast, they have been caught out as significantly pessimistic only once, in 2012, when they pegged the USDA figure 1m acres below where it actually came out.

China shares

Still, Chicago winter wheat for March fell by 0.2% to $4.68 a bushel, hurt in part by a weak technical performance in the last session, when it exhibited what is termed an “outside day, lower”.

Estimates for Wasde US 2015-16 corn data and (current figure)

Harvested area: 80.634m acres, (80.664m acres)

Yield: 169.2 bushels per acre, (169.3 bpa)

Production: 13.646bn bushels, (13.654bn bushels)

Carryout stocks: 1.785bn bushels, (1.785bn bushels)

World carrout stocks: 212.51m tonnes, (211.85m tonnes)

Sources: USDA, Reuters

That is, the contract traded beyond the price range of the previous session, and recorded a lower close – seen as a negative signal for values.

And overhanging all markets is the continued worrying signals coming out of China, the world’s second largest economy.

If it was good news that Shanghaishares closed higher on Tuesday, the extent of the gain was less impressive, at 0.2%, hardly much of a bounce from the 5% slump the session before.

Tokyo shares closed down 2.7%, with small declines seen in Seoul and Sydney, although London stocks staged a 0.5% bounce in early deals.

And in commodity markets, Brent crude extended its decline, dropping 2.3% to $30.83 a barrel, and at one point touching $30.43 a barrel, its lowest since April 2004.

‘Bearish catalyst’

A drop in oil prices is of course a negative sign for the likes of corn, used largely in making bioethanol, although Chicago corn futures for March did manage a 0.25-cent gain to $3.52 a bushel.

“The deterioration in the crude market has certainly been a bearish catalyst on the corn market as ethanol margins have been compressed,” said Benson Quinn Commodities.

While China also announced it had started an anti-dumping investigation into imports of US distillers’ grains (DDGs), the corn-based feed ingredient, that was little surprise, with the rumour having been rumoured for weeks.

Analysts expect the Wasde to keep the estimate for US corn stocks at the close of 2015-16 at 1.785bn bushels.

While the harvest is seen has having been overstated by 8m bushels, a weak export performance is worrying investors.

The 550,000 tonnes of US corn exports last week, as reported officially on Monday, “is just half of what the market needs to be doing right now” to meet the USDA;s current target for 2015-16, said Benson Quinn Commodities.

“Totals are running at 22.6% of the marketing year-end estimate versus the five-year average of 32.6%.”

Brazil downgrade?

Soybean futures managed modest price gains too, adding 0.2% for March delivery to stand at $8.63 a bushel.

Estimates for Wasde US 2015-16 soybean data and (current figure)

Harvested area: 82.404m acres, (82.429m acres)

Yield: 48.3 bushels per acre, (48.3 bpa)

Production: 3.981bn bushels, (3.981bn bushels)

Carryout stocks: 468m bushels, (465m bushels)

World carrout stocks: 82.57m tonnes, (82.58m tonnes)

Sources: USDA, Reuters

There are expectations that the Wasde will cut the estimate for Brazil’s production of the oilseed, following dry weather in major central and northern producing areas.

That said, a downgrade would hardly be surprising, after the USDA bureau in Brasilia last week cut its forecast by 2m tonnes to 98m tonnes, while consultancy AgRural earlier this week cut its estimate by 1m tonnes to 98.7m tonnes.

Investors are expecting little change to the Wasde estimate for world soybean stocks of 82.6m tonnes, at the close of 2015-16, with the forecast for US inventories seen being upgraded by 3m bushels to 468m bushels.

Still, the US soybean stocks figure for December 1, revealed by the separate USDA grain inventory report, could well come in below investor expectations if history is a guide.

Investors have overestimated the actual USDA figure in 17 out of the last 27 years.

‘Pressure on vegetable oil markets’

Where worries in China continued to be felt more keenly was in thepalm oil and soyoil markets, with the country a major importer of edible oils.

“China equity markets continue to sag,” said Terry Reilly at Chicago-based broker Futures International, flagging “pressure on vegetable oil markets around the world”.

Furthermore, palm oil futures on China’s Dalian exchange dropped 1.1% to 4,662 renminbi per tonne for March, with soyoil for March settling down 0.9% at 5,550 renminbi per tonne.

Kuala Lumpur palm oil for March stood down 0.8% at 2,380 ringgit a tonne, dropping below its 40-day moving average on a continuous chart for the first time in nearly a month.

Chicago soyoil for March was 0.4% lower at 29.14 cents a pound.

‘Waning global demand’

Meanwhile, in New York, cotton futures for March edged 0.2% higher to 61.59 cents a pound, putting a little more distance between itself and the three month low of 61.15 cents a pound touched in the last session.

“Waning global demand remains an issue for cotton, and current concerns over the health of China’s economy only add to that,” with the country the top importer, Commonwealth Bank of Australia’s Tobin Gorey said.

“Investors are still heavily long cotton which leaves the market vulnerable to this type of bad news.”

The Wasde is expected to trim the forecast for US production of the fibre, by 50,000 bales to 12.98m bales, according to a Wall Street Journal survey.

But the export figure is seen being reduced too, by 70,000 bales to 9.93m bales.

The estimate for carryout stocks for 2015-16 is forecast seeing a small upgrade, of 80,000 bale to 3.08m bales.

SOURCE:agrimoney.com

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

Quick Estimates of Index of Industrial Production and Use-Based Index for the Month of November, 2015

13 Wednesday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Economics, INDIA, NATIONAL NEWS, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

India growth rates, India Index of Industrial Production

(Base 2004-05=100)

The Quick Estimates of Index of Industrial Production (IIP) with base 2004-05 for the month of November 2015 have been released by the Central Statistics Office of the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. IIP is compiled using data received from 15 source agencies viz. Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP); Indian Bureau of Mines; Central Electricity Authority; Joint Plant Committee, Ministry of Steel; Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas; Office of Textile Commissioner; Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals; Directorate of Sugar & Vegetable Oils; Department of Fertilizers; Tea Board; Office of Jute Commissioner; Office of Coal Controller; Railway Board; Office of Salt Commissioner and Coffee Board.

  1. The General Index for the month of November 2015 stands at 166.6, which is 3.2 percent lower as compared to the level in the month of November 2014. The cumulative growth for the period April-November 2015 over the corresponding period of the previous year stands at 3.9 percent.
  2. The Indices of Industrial Production for the Mining, Manufacturing and Electricity sectors for the month of November 2015 stand at 131.5, 171.9 and 175.6 respectively, with the corresponding growth rates of 2.3 percent, (-) 4.4 percent and 0.7 percent as compared to November 2014 (Statement I). The cumulative growth in three sectors during April-November 2015 over the corresponding period of 2014 has been 2.1 percent, 3.9 percent and 4.6 percent respectively.
  3. In terms of industries, seventeen (17) out of the twenty two (22) industry groups (as per 2-digit NIC-2004) in the manufacturing sec tor have shown negative growth during the month of November 2015 as compared to the corresponding month of the previous year (St atement II). The industry group ‘Electrical machinery & apparatus n.e.c.’ has shown the highest negative growth of (-) 46.5 percent, followed by (-) 13.8 percent in ‘Luggage, handbags, saddlery, harness & footwear; tanning and dressing of leather products’ and (-) 13.1 percent in ‘Wood and products of wood & cork except furniture; articles of straw & plating materials’. On the other hand, the industry group ‘Furniture; manufacturing n.e.c.’ has shown the highest positive growth of 102.1 percent, followed by 11.1 percent in ‘Office, accounting & computing machinery’ and 9.7 percent in ‘Radio, TV and communication equipment & apparatus’.
  4. As per Use-based classification, the growth rates in November 2015 over November 2014 are (-) 0.7 percent in Basic goods, (-) 24.4 percent in Capital goods and (-) 0.7 percent in Intermediate goods (Statement III).  The Consumer durables and Consumer non-durables have recorded growth of 12.5 percent and (-) 4.7 percent respectively, with the overall growth in Consumer goods being 1.3 percent.
  5. Some important items showing high negative growth during the current month over the same month in previous year include ‘Cable, Rubber Insulated’             [(-) 87.1%], ‘Heat Exchangers’ [(-) 68.2%], ‘Polythene Bags including HDPE & LDPE Bags’ [(-) 58.0%], ‘Tractors (complete)’ [(-) 42.3%], ‘Conductor, Aluminium’ [(-) 36.8%], ‘Rice’ [(-) 27.1%] and ‘Three-Wheelers (including passenger & goods carrier)’ [(-) 23.7%].
  6. Some other important items that have registered high positive growth include ‘Gems and Jewellery’ (253.7%), ‘Sugar Machinery’ (78.0%), ‘Lubricating oil’ (66.5%), ‘Wood Furniture’ (46.9%), ‘PVC Pipes and Tubes’ (31.4%), ‘Transformers (small)’ (30.2%), ‘Polypropylene (including co-polymer)’ (30.1%) and ‘Sugar’ (25.7%).
  7. However, growth rates in respect of individual items may not reflect their actual contribution in the overall growth rate of IIP. Taking into account the weights of different items, the overall growth rate of IIP can be decomposed into positive and negative contributions of different items. Such contributions of top five items with positive contribution and top five items with negative contribution are given below:
Item Group Weights (%) Contribution to overall growth (%)
High Negative Contributors
Cable, Rubber Insulated 0.12 -2.2734
Conductor, Aluminium 0.20 -0.4065
Passenger Cars 1.97 -0.3052
Stainless/ alloy steel 0.64 -0.3013
H R Coils/Skelp 1.30 -0.2379
High Positive Contributors
Gems And Jewellery 1.77 1.4615
sugar(including sugar cubes) 1.52 0.3358
Mineral index 14.16 0.2386
Telephone Instruments Including Mobile Phone And Accessories 0.22 0.1922
Pipes 0.07 0.1136
  1. Along with the Quick Estimates of IIP for the month of November 2015, the indices for October 2015 have undergone the first revision and those for August 2015 have undergone the final revision in the light of the updated data received from the source agencies. It may be noted that these revised indices (first revision) in respect of October 2015 may undergo final (second) revision along with the release of IIP for the month of January 2016.
  2. Statements giving Quick Estimates of the Index of Industrial Production at Sectoral, 2-digit level of National Industrial Classification (NIC-2004) and by Use-based classification for the month of November 2015, along with the growth rates over the corresponding month of the previous year including the cumulative indices and growth rates are enclosed.

 

 

STATEMENT I: INDEX OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION – SECTORAL
(Base : 2004-05=100)
Month Mining Manufacturing Electricity General
(141.57) (755.27) (103.16) (1000.00)
2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16
Apr 122.6 121.9 181.4 188.5 178.1 177.2 172.7 177.9
May 125.3 127.9 183.5 187.3 183.9 195.0 175.3 179.7
Jun 122.1 121.6 180.1 189.5 181.6 183.7 172.0 179.3
Jul 116.2 117.7 182.2 190.9 183.8 190.3 173.0 180.5
Aug 115.0 120.2 173.4 184.8 184.1 194.4 166.2 176.6
Sep 115.3 118.8 181.9 187.2 175.6 195.7 171.8 178.4
Oct 124.2 130.6 170.0 188.1 184.9 201.6 165.1 181.4
Nov* 128.6 131.5 179.9 171.9 174.3 175.6 172.1 166.6
Dec 133.6 196.8 177.6 185.9
Jan 136.7 200.7 176.7 189.2
Feb 129.6 192.7 166.0 181.0
Mar 149.0 210.3 176.4 198.1
Average
Apr-Nov 121.2 123.8 179.1 186.0 180.8 189.2 171.0 177.6
Growth over the corresponding period of previous year
Nov 4.0 2.3 4.7 -4.4 10.0 0.7 5.2 -3.2
Apr-Nov 2.5 2.1 1.5 3.9 10.7 4.6 2.5 3.9
* Indices for Nov 2015 are Quick Estimates.
NOTE : Indices for the months of Aug’15 and Oct’15 incorporate updated production data.

 

 

STATEMENT II:  INDEX OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION – (2-DIGIT LEVEL)
(Base: 2004-05=100)
Industry Description Weight       Index           Cumulative Index   Percentage growth
code     Nov’14 Nov’15 Apr-Nov Nov’15 Apr-Nov
          2014-15 2015-16   2015-16
15 Food products and beverages 72.76 157.2 154.8 147.9 139.7 -1.5 -5.5
16 Tobacco products 15.70 101.1 100.8 106.1 103.2 -0.3 -2.7
17 Textiles 61.64 149.8 146.9 150.5 154.0 -1.9 2.3
18 Wearing apparel; dressing and dyeing of fur 27.82 167.9 164.1 163.8 180.2 -2.3 10.0
19 Luggage, handbags, saddlery, harness & footwear; tanning and dressing of leather products 5.82 148.8 128.2 144.5 147.1 -13.8 1.8
20 Wood and products of wood & cork except furniture; articles of straw & plating materials 10.51 150.4 130.7 145.1 153.8 -13.1 6.0
21 Paper and paper products 9.99 138.3 146.9 141.9 146.3 6.2 3.1
22 Publishing, printing & reproduction of recorded media 10.78 174.1 154.8 176.0 161.0 -11.1 -8.5
23 Coke, refined petroleum products & nuclear fuel 67.15 149.5 157.5 141.4 148.3 5.4 4.9
24 Chemicals and chemical products 100.59 139.4 138.3 136.2 143.3 -0.8 5.2
25 Rubber and plastics products 20.25 181.4 176.0 185.4 187.5 -3.0 1.1
26 Other non-metallic mineral products 43.14 156.9 150.6 166.3 164.4 -4.0 -1.1
27 Basic metals 113.35 226.0 212.2 217.6 223.6 -6.1 2.8
28 Fabricated metal products, except machinery & equipment 30.85 180.7 168.4 172.5 175.3 -6.8 1.6
29 Machinery and equipment n.e.c. 37.63 198.4 182.5 210.0 216.3 -8.0 3.0
30 Office, accounting & computing machinery 3.05 57.0 63.3 64.3 60.9 11.1 -5.3
31 Electrical machinery & apparatus n.e.c. 19.80 477.3 255.3 491.1 526.8 -46.5 7.3
32 Radio, TV and communication equipment & apparatus 9.89 272.5 298.9 377.4 355.7 9.7 -5.7
33 Medical, precision & optical instruments, watches and clocks 5.67 109.2 98.2 104.5 96.8 -10.1 -7.4
34 Motor vehicles, trailers & semi-trailers 40.64 234.7 219.7 220.8 236.5 -6.4 7.1
35 Other transport equipment 18.25 275.6 249.0 267.2 267.7 -9.7 0.2
36 Furniture; manufacturing n.e.c. 29.97 85.4 172.6 106.2 173.7 102.1 63.6
10 Mining & Quarrying 141.57 128.6 131.5 121.2 123.8 2.3 2.1
15-36 Manufacturing 755.27 179.9 171.9 179.1 186.0 -4.4 3.9
40 Electricity 103.16 174.3 175.6 180.8 189.2 0.7 4.6
General Index 1000 172.1 166.6 171.0 177.6 -3.2 3.9
n.e.c.: Not Elsewhere Classified
*Industry codes are as per National Industrial Classification 2004

 

STATEMENT III: INDEX OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION – USE-BASED
(Base : 2004-05=100)
  Basic goods Capital goods Intermediate goods Consumer goods Consumer durables Consumer non-durables
Month (456.82) (88.25) (156.86) (298.08) (84.60) (213.47)
  2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16
Apr 163.0 167.3 235.0 248.0 149.7 153.2 181.5 186.5 255.4 258.7 152.2 157.9
May 167.1 177.4 228.0 234.9 155.5 157.4 182.7 178.7 262.7 252.4 151.0 149.5
Jun 163.5 171.9 270.7 265.4 151.2 153.1 166.9 179.0 211.9 246.1 149.0 152.4
Jul 162.8 171.6 263.2 289.9 155.4 158.5 171.3 173.2 220.9 244.2 151.7 145.1
Aug 164.0 170.0 220.6 267.5 151.9 156.2 161.1 170.8 218.8 256.0 138.3 137.0
Sep 161.3 168.1 260.9 287.7 151.3 154.5 172.4 174.5 241.5 261.9 145.0 139.9
Oct 167.9 175.0 239.2 278.3 145.5 154.8 149.0 176.4 191.8 272.9 132.0 138.2
Nov* 168.2 167.0 252.1 190.7 151.4 150.3 165.1 167.2 201.6 226.9 150.6 143.5
Dec 174.6 269.7 159.0 192.4 208.0 186.2
Jan 175.4 270.5 158.3 202.3 246.6 184.8
Feb 164.6 254.9 151.8 199.6 251.2 179.2
Mar 180.8 331.5 164.8 202.7 261.9 179.3
Average
Apr-Nov 164.7 171.0 246.2 257.8 151.5 154.8 168.8 175.8 225.6 252.4 146.2 145.4
Growth over the corresponding period of previous year
Nov 9.5 -0.7 7.0 -24.4 4.7 -0.7 -1.6 1.3 -14.5 12.5 7.0 -4.7
Apr-Nov 8.3 3.8 4.9 4.7 1.9 2.2 -5.7 4.1 -15.9 11.9 1.8 -0.5
 
* Indices for Nov 2015 are Quick Estimates.
NOTE : Indices for the months of Aug’15 and Oct’15 incorporate updated production data.

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

The Trojan Horse of Free Basics

13 Wednesday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Economics, INDIA, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, Readers News Service

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Face book, Facts, Free Basics, Prabir Purkayastha, Reliance, Trojan Horse

Prabir Purkayastha

Facebook is running a high profile, misleading campaign, using full page advertisements, blocks of TV time, hoardings, and Facebook itself. This campaign, estimated to cost more than Rs. 400 crore, is promoting Facebook’s private, proprietary platform called “Free Basics” and calling its opponents as anti-poor. In India, Facebook has tied up with Reliance Telecommunications for offering this platform. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has stayed the Facebook-Reliance proposal for now, and issued a Consultation paper on whether telecom operators can offer differential rates for data while connecting to different websites. The Facebook campaign is obviously an attempt to influence this consultation.

 An unlikely alliance of activists, academicians, start-ups and techies have mounted a visible and an effective counter campaign. The Free Software Movement of India has had sit-ins, demonstrations, and various other forms of protests, particularly in Hyderabad and Bangalore. Activists have also launched popular on-line campaigns such as #SayNoToFreeBasics and #SaveTheInternet, which has generated a lot of support.

Image result for facebook

Facebook is not only vilifying all net neutrality supporters through its misleading campaign, it is also violating various provisions of Indian laws and codes. Facebook’s name of the platform – Free Basics – is an attempt to use the common meaning of the term free, basic internet and confuse the people. This is a violation of the existing advertisement codes in the country and against provisions of the Consumer Protection Act. Free Basics is a similar violation, perhaps fuelled by the belief that Facebook is anyway not answerable to Indian laws.

Facebook has consistently refused to face any legal proceedings in India, claiming to be an American company. As the Delhi High Court case brought out, it also does not pay any taxes on the huge revenue it earns in India. If Facebook really wants to participate in India’s development, its first step should be to start paying taxes here and be answerable to Indian laws. Without this, it has no locus in India’s policy making.

What is net neutrality and why is it important?

Today, the Internet has nearly a billion websites. This means that out of the 3.5 billion users of the internet, on an average, 1 out of 3.5 of such users also run websites and offer services. The internet is not just about our surfing the internet as passive consumers of websites and apps, but also very much a vehicle for us to reach out to other netizens.

The reason that the internet, has become such a powerful force for change in such a short time, is precisely because anybody can connect to anybody else anywhere in the world, not only to receive, but also to provide content. We are using content here to cover both web content or web services. All that is required, is that each side – receiving or providing content — has access to the internet. Once we have connected to the internet, there is zero cost to offer or receive content. Tim Wu, the father of net neutrality, has written that keeping the two sides of the internet free of gatekeepers has generated this huge burst of innovation.

This is what has made the internet, as a platform, so different from other mass communications platforms, such as radio and television. Essentially, it has unleashed the creativity of the masses; and it is this creativity we see in the hundreds of millions of active websites.

All this would stop if the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) or Telecom companies (Telcos) are given the right to act as gatekeepers. This is what net neutrality is all about – no ISP or Telco can decide what part of the internet or which websites we can access.

What platforms such as Facebook would like to have, is that people visit only their websites. Free Basics is a platform controlled entirely by Facebook that will offer access to Facebook, and a few other websites that are its partners. Instead of all the sites that we visit and search seamlessly today, such a platform will be an enclosed Internet – a walled garden — consisting of only Facebook and what it chooses to give us.

When Facebook claims that it is not violating net neutrality, it is providing its own definition of net neutrality. Its claim is that since it does not discriminate between any website or platform that is on its Free Basic platform, it is not violating net neutrality. The point is that the Reliance-Facebook tie-up proposes to block all sites except the few that on its Free Basics platform. Such a data service provides only a few sites out of the one billion sites that are available on the internet. If this is not a violation of net neutrality, we do not know what is!

The Department of Telecom has already accepted that net neutrality is a basic regulatory principle for the internet and network operators should not accept as gatekeepers. If we reject this principle, this will not only allow zero rating services such as Free Basics, but can also lead to other forms of discrimination. The network operators or Telcos can then demand money to speed up certain sites or slow down others.

Net neutrality wars and new cartels

The first net neutrality wars were between the telecom companies, who then had market power, as only they could provide access to their subscribers. They demanded money from websites for allowing websites to connect to their subscribers. This led internet companies and netizens combining to defeat the telecom monopolies and the acceptance that net neutrality as a principle should govern the internet. We are now seeing the second set of net neutrality wars. Big internet monopolies have discovered the virtue of freezing their competition out. They are now combining with the Telcos to form the cartels that will keep out their competition. Offering free data services for a few websites is one such strategy and known as zero rating services.

While it is claimed that Facebook is not paying any money to Reliance, there is no transparency in the private agreement that Facebook has made with Reliance.

Cartels between the telecom companies and a few global internet monopolies will lead to further concentration of economic power on the internet, marginalising innovations and most of the progressive media. Instead of the multiplicity of sites and views, the Internet would then rapidly become like cable TV platforms, with a bouquet of a few websites. This is what Facebook is attempting, carry a few hundred sites as against the 1 billion we have access to today, and call it the basic internet.

This Facebook campaign also shows us the kind of market power that Internet companies such as Facebook exercise today. Facebook has more than 125 million users in India, the second largest in the world after the US. All Facebook users in India have been given a completely distorted view of what Free Basics is, and a vicious campaign launched against all those who would like to preserve net neutrality.

The lie of a Free Basic Internet

Zuckerberg, in his full page ads that are running in various papers, claims that a whole bunch of public services such as libraries, hospitals, and schools have a similar architecture to what he is offering. A cheap version where anybody can access a limited set of free services and a more restricted version, where everything is available, but at a price.

Clearly, Zuckerberg has never seen a public library or a public hospital in his life. The biggest libraries in the world are public libraries. Public hospitals offer all services to all the people. They are structured as primary, secondary and tertiary services, so some specialised services are available only at secondary or tertiary facilities. Where there are good public health systems – unlike the US — all health services are available to all citizens. Similarly, the best educational institutions in the world are public institutions, created to offer education as public goods.

Facebook earlier offered its controversial Internet.org and which is now re-branded as Free Basics. It is claiming that it is offering a free, basic internet as the platform is called Free Basics. Who has decided what constitutes what is a free and a basic internet? Mr. Zuckerberg? What gives him the sole right to determine what we as people need? What makes him think that connecting the Indian poor to Facebook will give her education and health? What makes him believe that the internet is a substitute for schools, colleges and hospitals?

The need for cheap access for data services

Instead of accepting the Trojan horse of Free Basics, we need to create the right set of policies so that data services are cheap and easily accessible. Public money — from the Universal Service Obligation (USO) Fund — is being used to set up the most expensive part of the internet, its fibre optic backbone. The government simultaneously has to create policies that will allow free, non discriminatory internet services up to a limit for all users, and TRAI has to create the right regulatory environment for net neutrality.

There are various ways of providing free or cost effective internet to the low-end subscribers. They could be provided some free data with their data connection, or get some free time slots when the traffic on the network is low. The 2G data prices can and should be brought down drastically, as the telcos have already made their investments and recovered their costs from the subscribers.

Unfortunately, the Prime Minister hobnobbing publicly with Silicon Valley majors is unfortunate when such crucial policies are being debated in the country. Modi’s Townhall with Zuckerberg in the Facebook headquarters is perhaps one reason that Facebook feels emboldened to offer its controversial platform without any regulatory approval.

India cannot allow the internet to become a private monopoly. The danger of a private platform, instead of a public internet, is that it introduces a new kind of digital divide among the people. A large fraction of those who will join up such platforms, may come to believe that Facebook is indeed the internet. As Morozev writes (Guardian: 29 November 2015), “Digital divide”, today is “… about those who can afford not to be stuck in the data clutches of Silicon Valley – counting on public money or their own capital to pay for connectivity – and those who are too poor to resist the tempting offers of Google and Facebook.”

The British Empire was based on the control of the seas. Today, whoever controls the data oceans, controls the global economy. Silicon Valley’s data grab is the new form of colonialism we are witnessing now. This is what we have to fight, not merely as netizens but as citizens.

Author / Source / Date:

Newsclick Production, January 6, 2016

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

How the influence of World Bank policies damaged China’s economy

12 Tuesday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in CHINA, Current Affairs, Economics, International, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, Readers News Service

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

China 2030, China’s economy, World Bank policies

 January 11, 2016, John Ross,

 Present negative trends in China’s financial system and economy were accurately predicted by me three years ago as occurring if there was any influence of policies of the World Bank Report on China.

While China has made major steps forward in areas such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and New Silk Road (‘One Belt One Road’) unfortunately in some areas World Bank policies did acquire influence. As predicted they led to present negative trends.

There should also be clarity. China has the world’s strongest macroeconomic structure so these trends will not lead to a China ‘hard landing’. But they are a confirmation that no country, including China, can escape the laws of economics. As long as there is any influence of World Bank type policies, which are also advocated by Western writers such as George Magnus and Patrick Chovanec, there will be problems in China’s financial system and economy.

The article I wrote in September 2012 which was published under the original title ‘Fundamental errors of the World Bank report on China’ is republished without alteration.

* * *

The World Bank’s report China 2030 has, unsurprisingly, provoked major criticism and protest. I have read World Bank reports on China for more than 20 years and this is undoubtedly the worst. So glaring are its factual errors, and economic non-sequiturs, that it is difficult to believe it was intended as an objective analysis of China’s economy. It appears to be driven by the political objective of supporting current US policies, embodied in proposals such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Listing merely the factual errors in the report, of both commission and omission, as well as the elementary economic howlers, would take up more column inches than are available to me. So what follows is just a small selection, leaving space to consider the possible purpose of such a strange report.

The report has no serious factual analysis of the present stage of China’s economic development. On the one hand it is behind the times and “pessimistic”, saying China may become “the world’s largest economy before 2030”. This is extremely peculiar as, by the most elementary economic calculations, (the Economist magazine now even provides a ready reckoner!) China will become the world’s largest economy before 2020.

On the other hand, the report greatly exaggerates the rate at which China will enter the highest form of value added production. As such, the report calls for various changes in China, and bases its calls on the rationale of “when a developing country reaches the technology frontier’. But China’s economy, unfortunately, is not yet approaching the international technology frontier, except in specialized defence-related areas. Even when China’s GDP equals that of the US, China’s per capita GDP, a good measure of technology’s spread across its economy, will be less than one quarter of the US’s. Even making optimistic assumptions, China’s per capita GDP will not equal the US’s until around 2040, by which time China’s economy would be more than four times the size of the US’s! Put another way, China will not reach the technology frontier, in a generalized way, for around three decades, so this rationale can’t be used to justify changes now.

The report appears to envisage China’s development path differing from that of every other country on the planet. It claims that in China “the continued accumulation of capital… will inevitably contribute less to growth”. But one of the most established trends of economic development, first outlined by Adam Smith and econometrically confirmed to the present day, is that capital’s contribution to growth increases with development. Deng Xiaoping certainly argued that economic policy must have “Chinese characteristics”, i.e. be adapted to China’s specific conditions. However, he never argued that China was exempt from economic laws, which is what this report appears to envisage!

The report makes elementary economic mistakes, such as confusing the consequences of high export shares with trade surpluses. It argues: “If China’s current export growth persists, its projected global market share could rise to 20 percent by 2030, which is almost double the peak of Japan’s global market share in the mid-1980s when it faced fierce protectionist sentiments… China’s current trajectory… could cause unmanageable trade frictions.” But if China increases its import share at the same rate as exports, this would not create major trade frictions. Japan’s problem was trade surpluses, not export share.

It is almost impossible to believe, given such elementary mistakes, that this report was intended as a serious objective analysis of China’s economy. What, then, is its goal? , The report spells out its goal clearly enough in calling for China to abandon the policies launched by Deng Xiaoping which brought such success. It says: “Reforms that launched China on its current growth trajectory were inspired by Deng Xiaoping… China has reached another turning point in its development path when a second strategic, and no less fundamental, shift is called for.”

What is this new “non-Dengite” economic policy? Deng Xiaoping’s most famous economic statement was “it doesn’t matter whether a cat is black or white provided it catches mice”. Effectively, this means, in economic terms, that a company should not be judged by whether it is private or state owned but by how it performs. The proposed new economic policy overturns Deng’s dictum by saying: “Reintroduce judging cats by colour, promote the private sector cat.”

The consequences of this are clearly seen in the report’s financial proposals. During the international financial crisis, China was protected by its state-owned banking system. The US and European privately-owned banks simultaneously created the financial crisis and were flattened by it, throwing their economies into crisis. China, however, suffered no significant setback.

The reasons for the US and European banking crisis are well understood. Modern banks are necessarily very large, both in order to undertake international operations and because of the inherent risk of large investment projects. They are literally “too large to fail”, as the failure of any large bank creates an unacceptable economic crisis. This theoretical point was rammed home by the devastating consequences of Lehman’s collapse, following which no government will allow a large bank to fail.

But a situation in which the state is blocking the bankruptcy of a large bank, whose profits are being privately retained, creates disastrous risk. If large private banks are state guaranteed against crippling losses, but retain profits, they are incentivized to undertake potentially profitable but highly risky operations. The disastrous results of this scenario were seen during the financial crisis.

Extraordinarily, this report proposes that China abandon the financial system which brought it successfully through the financial crisis and instead adopt the one which led the US and Europe to disaster. This is the real significance of “privatization would be the best way to make SFIs [State Financial Institutions] more commercially oriented”.

This ties in with US TransPacific Partnership pressure for the elimination of China’s state-owned companies, which are seen as giving China a completive advantage over the US. The US, of course, does not possess such companies. If the US is worried about the competitive disadvantage created by not having state-owned companies, it should create some, not call for China to abandon its own.

The last World Bank report of this type was published in February 1991 and its Study of the Soviet Economy provided the basis for Russia’s economic policies of the 1990s.

The result was that Russia suffered the greatest peacetime economic disaster to befall any country. GDP declined by more than half. Russian male life expectancy fell by four years and we saw the beginning of a population decline, which continues to this day. The USSR subsequently disintegrated, in what Vladimir Putin called the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century. Russia has not recovered.

This type of economic program is therefore not simply a “theoretical” model. It has been thoroughly and demonstrably discredited on account of the catastrophes it has produced. Russia was ill advised enough to adopt this type of economic program. It is to be hoped, then, that China does not follow the same course

*   *   *

John Ross is Senior Fellow at Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China. 

This article is based on a post from John Ross’ blog, published on the 8th of Jan, 2016.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

Weakening yuan likely to create threat to Indian apparel exporters

12 Tuesday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Economics, INDIA, Readers News Service

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Indian apparel exports, New textile policy, yuan

YarnsandFibers News Bureau, 2016-01-12 – Ahmedabad

India has its strength in the value-added, hand-embodied, casual fashion garments consisting of small orders, whereas China has its strength in high value, basic garments. The depreciation of Yuan, if continued further, after yarn, the Indian apparel exporters would face a potential threat as both the countries have access to the common markets of US and European Union, according to Rahul Mehta, President International Apparel Federation and Clothing Manufactures’ Association of India.

Already, till December, apparel exports had been growing at a rate of 7-8% against the anticipated 13-15%. Much of the fall in exports growth rate is being attributed to decline in Indian apparel exports to markets like China, Europe and the US due to overall economic slowdown.

New textile policy await Cabinet approval

YarnsandFibers News Bureau, 2016-01-12  – New Delhi

Textiles Ministry to seek approval for the new national textile policy from Cabinet for which they will be approaching the Cabinet in 10-15 days, said Union Minister Santosh Gangwar today.

The new policy aims to achieve USD 300 billion textiles exports by 2024-25 and envisages creation of additional 35 million jobs.

The policy also aims to address concerns of adequate skilled work force, labour reforms, attract investments in the textile sector, and to provide a future road map for the textile and clothing industry.

Ministry of Textiles had initiated the process of reviewing the National Textile Policy, 2000 keeping in view the various changes in textile industry on domestic and international fronts and the need for a road map for the textile and apparel industry.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

Robot: 10 Facts

08 Friday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in Economics, employees, INTERNATIONAL NEWS, Readers News Service

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Robot, robotics

The automotive industry dominates the ever growing field of robotics.

Takeaways

  • The automotive industry is the largest user of industrial robots worldwide.
  • China — the world’s largest producer of cars — currently has 281 robots per 10,000 automotive industry workers.
  • The US employed 152 robots in all industries per 10,000 workers in 2013, tripling the global average.

1.South Korea employed 437 robots per 10,000 manufacturing workers as of 2013 — the highest robot density in the world.

2.South Korea has held the top spot since 2011, when it overtook Japan.

3.Japan’s industrial robot density in 2013 was 323 per 10,000 workers.

4.Third-ranked Germany had 282 robots in use per 10,000 workers — the highest rate in Europe.

5.One of the things South Korea, Japan and Germany all have in common is a huge automotive industry.

6.The automotive industry is the largest user of industrial robots. Other robot-intensive industries include electronics, metals, plastics and food.

7.China — the world’s largest producer of cars — currently has 281 robots per 10,000 automotive industry workers.

8.In all other industries, China’s robot industry rate was only about 14 per 10,000 workers.

9.The United States employed 152 robots in all industries per 10,000 workers in 2013.

10.While the U.S.’s robot density is just about a third of South Korea’s, it is almost three times the global rate of 62 robots per 10,000 manufacturing workers.

Source: World Robots 2014, International Federation of Robotics, with analysis by The Globalist Research Center

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural and Rural Labourers –November, 2015

06 Wednesday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in Current Affairs, Economics, INDIA, NATIONAL NEWS, Prices

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

All-India Consumer Price Index, Rural Labourers

             The All-India Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers and Rural Labourers (Base: 1986-87=100) for November, 2015 increased by  4 points each to stand at 853 (Eight hundred and fifty three) points and 857 (Eight hundred and fifty seven) points respectively.

The rise/fall in index varied from State to State. In case of Agricultural Labourers, it recorded an increase between 1 to 18 points in 11 States and a decrease between 2 to 9 points in 8 States while it remained stationary in 1 State. Karnataka State with 950 points topped the index table whereas Himachal Pradesh with 704 points stood at the bottom.

In case of Rural Labourers, it recorded an increase between 1 to 17 points in 11 States and a decrease between 1 to 9 points in 8 States while it remained stationary in 1 State. Karnataka with 944 points topped the index table whereas Himachal Pradesh with 743 points stood at the bottom.

The Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers and Rural Labourers of Tamilnadu State registered the maximum increase of 18 points and 17 points respectively mainly due to increase in the prices of bajra, pulses, meat goat, fish fresh/dry, milk, onion, chillies dry, vegetables & fruits, bidi and firewood. On the contrary, the Consumer Price Index Numbers for Agricultural Labourers and Rural Labourers of Meghalaya State registered the maximum decrease of 9 points each due to decrease in the prices of beef, pork, poulty, onion, chillies green, ginger, vegetables & fruits, tobacco leaf and pan leaf.

Point to point rate of inflation based on the CPI-AL and CPI-RL increased from 4.43% and 4.66% in October, 2015 to 4.92% and 5.02% in November, 2015. Inflation based on food index of CPI-AL and CPI-RL is 4.79% and 5.15% respectively during November, 2015.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

అగమ్య గోచరంగా పత్తి రైతుల స్థితి

06 Wednesday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in AP NEWS, Current Affairs, Economics, Farmers, INDIA, NATIONAL NEWS, Prices

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

cotton, cotton prices, World Cotton

ఎం కోటేశ్వరరావు

మొత్తం మీద పత్తి రైతుల స్థితి అగమ్య గోచరంగా వుంది. ఇప్పటికి అమ్ముకున్నదానికి కనీస మద్దతు ధర రాలేదన్నది ఏకాభిప్రాయం. అమ్మకుండా మరి కొన్ని వారాలు నిల్వ వుంచితే ధరలు పెరుగుతాయన్న సూచనలు కనిపించటం లేదు. ఇటు జాతీయంగా అటు అంతర్జాతీయంగా మార్కెట్‌లో పెద్దగా కదలికలు వుండటం లేదు. ఎవరు చెప్పినా చైనాపై నెపం మోపటం ఆశ్చర్యంగా వుంది. ఏ వంకా లేని వారు డొంకట్టుకు ఏడ్చారన్న సామెత తెలిసిందే. అమెరికా వారూ అదే చెప్పి మనవారూ దానికే తందానా అనటం అదేదో సినిమాలో చెప్పినట్లు చాలా బాగోలేదు. ఎవరి విధానాలు వారివి అయినపుడు పోల్చుకోవటం అసంబద్దం. కానీ తీరు ఎలా వుందంటే దున్నబోతే దూడల్లో మెయ్యబోతే ఎద్దుల్లో అన్నట్లుగా వుంది. తెలుగు రాష్ట్రాలలో పండే పత్తి మద్దతు ధర క్వింటాలుకు రు.4,100 కాగా ఎక్కడా ఆ ధర రావటం లేదన్నది రైతుల గోడు,గోస.

ప్రపంచమంతటా పత్తి ధరలు తగ్గాయన్నది ఒక వాస్తవం. మార్కెట్‌ ఆర్ధికవేత్తల సూత్రం ప్రకారం వుత్పత్తి తగ్గితే ధరలు పెరుగుతాయి, సరఫరా పెరిగితే ధరలు తగ్గుతాయి. కానీ వర్తమాన పత్తి సంవత్సరంలో ూత్పత్తి తగ్గిందీ, ధరలూ తగ్గాయి. దీన్ని వివరించలేక పెట్టుబడిదారీ మేథావులు నానా ఇబ్బందులు పడుతూ దగ్గర దారిగా చైనా మీద నెడుతున్నారు.

ఈ ఏడాది పత్తి వుత్పత్తి 111.3 మిలియన్ల బేళ్లుగా వుంటుందని గతేడాది మే నెలలో తొలి అంచనా ప్రకటించారు. ఇప్పుడు 103.7 మిలియన్లకు తగ్గించారు. పత్తి వినియోగం 115.5 నుంచి 111.4 మిలియన్‌ బేళ్లకు తగ్గించారు. ప్రపంచంలో పత్తిని అధికంగా పండించటమే గాక వినియోగంలో కూడా అగ్రభాగాన వున్న చైనాలో వుత్పత్తి, వినియోగం రెండూ తగ్గుతాయని అంచనా. దీంతో మన దేశం ఇప్పుడు వుత్పత్తిలో అగ్రస్థానానికి చేరుకుంది. ఏతా వాతా చెబుతోందేమిటంటే చైనా డిమాండ్‌ రానున్న సంవత్సరాలలో కూడా తక్కువగానే వుండబోతున్నదట. ఇటు వంటి స్ధితిలో మన రైతాంగాన్ని ఎఆదుకోవాలనే విషయంలో కేంద్ర, రాష్ట్ర ప్రభుత్వాలు దీర్ఘకాలిక లేదా తాత్కాలిక చర్యలు చేపట్ట లేదు. అందుకే మార్కెట్‌లో కనీస మద్దతు ధర కూడా లభ్యం కావటం లేదు.తాజా సమాచారం ప్రకారం ప్రపంచంలో పత్తి దిగుమతిలో అగ్రదేశంగా చైనాను పక్కకు నెట్టి బంగ్లాదేశ్‌ ఆ స్ధానాన్ని ఆక్రమించనుందని చెబుతున్నారు.ఈ సంవత్సరం పాకిస్తాన్‌, వియత్నాం, బంగ్లాదేశ్‌ల నుంచి ఆర్డర్లు వున్న కారణంగా ఇప్పుడున్న ధరైనా వస్తున్నట్లు చెప్పుకోవచ్చు.ఈ పరిస్ధితి వచ్చే ఏడాది కూడా కొనసాగితే పత్తి సాగు మరింత తగ్గిపోయి మనం కూడా పత్తి, దుస్తులను దిగుమతి చేసుకోవాల్సి వచ్చినా ఆశ్చర్యం లేదు.

చైనా పత్తి వుత్పత్తి, వినియోగం తగ్గినా అక్కడి రైతాంగానికి నష్టం లేని విధంగా చైనా చర్యలు తీసుకొంటోంది. డిసెంబరు తొమ్మిదవ తేదీ నాటి సమాచార ప్రకారం ఒక పౌను దూది( 453 గ్రాములు) విలువ అమెరికాలో 71, చైనాలో 91.6, భారత్‌లో 62.7 పాకిస్తాన్‌లో 61 సెంట్లుగా వుంది. అంటే చైనా రైతులు వున్నంతలో మెరుగ్గా వున్నారు.

అనేక అంశాలలో ఇటీవల మన నేతలు చైనాతో పోల్చుతున్నారు. మరి పత్తి ధరలు అంత తక్కువగా ఎందుకు వున్నట్లు ? మన దేశంలో అనేక మంది రోజుకు ఒక జత బట్టలతో గడిపేవారు చాలా మంది వున్నారు. అందరికీ తగినన్ని దుస్తులు అందుబాటులో వుంటే నిజానికి మనం పండించే పత్తి మనకే చాలదు. దుస్తుల వినియోగంలో మనం ఎక్కడున్నాం ?

అమెరికా,ఐరోపా దేశాలలో ఇప్పటికే గరిష్ట స్ధాయికి చేరింది. 1990 నుంచి క్రమంగా తగ్గుతున్నది.2012లో హానోయ్‌లో జరిగిన ఐటిఎంఎఫ్‌ సభకు సమర్పించిన అంచనా ప్రకారం మన దేశంలో దుస్తుల తలసరి వినియోగం 2005లో 19 డాలర్లుగా వున్నది 2010లో 30 2015లో 46 డాలర్లుగా వుంటుందని పేర్కొన్నారు. అదే చైనాలో 52,119,209 డాలర్లుగా చూపారు. అందువలన ఇప్పుడు మనకు కావాల్సింది దుస్తుల వినియోగం పెరుగుదల.ఒకసారి కట్టిన వస్త్రాన్ని మరొకసారి కట్టని వారు, ఒకదాన్నే పగలు ధరించి రాత్రికి వుతుక్కొని తిరిగి పగలు చిరిగి పోయేంత వరకు వేసుకొనే వారూ వున్నారు. అలాంటి వారి సగటు తీసుకుంటే 2012లో జరిపిన జాతీయ ఇంటింటి సర్వే ప్రకారం మన సగటు వినియోగం 25.93 మీటర్లు. వాటి వెల రు.2,862.87లు ( మీటరు సగటు ధర రు.110.40) అంతకు ముందు ఏడాది 24.7 మీటర్లు, రు 2,473.64పైసలుగా వుంది.( మీటరు సగటు ధర రు.100.14) వినియోగ విషయానికి వస్తే పురుషులలో 48శాతం పెరగ్గా స్త్రీలలో 43 మాత్రమే వుంది. ధరలలో తలసరి కొనుగోళ్లను చూస్తే 2000-2012 మధ్య 76 శాతం పెరుగుదల వుంది.అదే నగదు రూపంలో 138శాతం పెరిగింది. ఇది దుస్తుల ధరల పెరుగుదలను సూచిస్తోంది. ధరలు అదుపులో వుంటే వినియోగం పెరుగుతుందని వేరే చెప్పనవసరం లేదు. మొత్తం దుస్తులలో గ్రామాలలో 62.5శాతం వినియోగిస్తున్నారు. తలసరి వినియోగానికి వస్తే గ్రామాలలో 23.54, పట్టణాలలో 31.2 మీటర్లు వినియోగిస్తున్నారు.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

తలకిందులైన వూట సిద్ధాంతం-దలాల్‌ స్ట్రీట్‌ ఆక్రమణ తధ్యం

06 Wednesday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in BJP, Congress, Current Affairs, Economics, INDIA, NATIONAL NEWS, Others

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

India Super Rich, occupy dalal street, percolation theory, Trickle Down, Trickle-Up Policy

సత్య

సామ్యవాదం విఫలమైంది, కనుక పెట్టుబడిదారీ విధానం మినహా మరొక గత్యంతరం లేదు. పెట్టుబడిదారీ విధానం వెనుకటికీ ఇప్పటికీ ఎంతో మారిపోయింది.దాని మానవీయ ముఖాన్ని మనం చూడటం లేదు. ప్రభుత్వాలు అన్నీ చేయాలంటే కుదరదు, చివరికి వుల్లిపాయలను కూడా ప్రభుత్వమే అమ్మాలనటం అన్యాయం. ఈనాడున్న యంత్రాంగంలో జనానికి చేరేలోపు వుల్లి పాయలు కుళ్లి పోవటం తప్ప మరొక ప్రయోజనం లేదు, అందువలన అలాంటి వాటన్నింటినీ ప్రయివేటు రంగానికి వదలి వేస్తే జనానికి సరసమైన ధరలకు, రైతాంగానికి గిట్టుబాటు ధరలు లభిస్తాయి. ప్రయివేటు రంగానికి ఆదాయం వస్తే అది క్రమంగా వూటమాదిరి కిందికి దిగి సమాజానికంతటికీ పంపిణీ అవుతుంది. సోషలిజం చెప్పేది కూడా ఇదే కదా ! పెట్టుబడిదారులను, భూస్వాములను కూలదోసి, అంతం చేసి సోషలిజాన్ని సాధిస్తామని కమ్యూనిస్టులు చెబుతారు, అంతటి రక్తపాతం అవసరమా ? దాని కంటే వూట సిద్ధాంతం మెరుగు కదా ?

గత కొద్ది సంవత్సరాలుగా మనకు చెబుతున్న కబుర్లు ఇవి. ప్రపంచంలో పెట్టుబడిదారీ విధానమే ఎక్కువ దేశాలలో వుండటం, వనరులన్నీ ప్రయివేటురంగం చేజిక్కించుకోవటం, సోషలిస్టు వ్యవస్థలు వున్న దేశాలు పరిమితం కావటం వలన వనరులు పూర్తిగా జనపరం అయ్యేంత వరకు అన్నీ ప్రభుత్వం చేయలేదు అని కొంత మేరకు ఒప్పుకోవచ్చు. మన దేశంలో ధనవంతులలో తొలి వ్యక్తి ముకేష్‌ అంబానీ. అతగాడి సంపద విలువ లక్షా 50వేల కోట్ల రూపాయలు, అతని సామ్రాజ్య ఆదాయం నాలుగు లక్షల 15వేల కోట్ల రూపాయలు. ఇంత సంపదలున్న పెద్దమనిషి వీధుల్లో వుల్లిపాయలు అమ్ముకొని పొట్టపోసుకొనే చిరువ్యాపారుల పొట్టకొడుతూ రిలయన్స్‌ ఫ్రెష్‌ పేరుతో వుల్లిపాయలు, కూరగాయలు కూడా అమ్మటం అవసరమా ? ఆయనే కాదు, తాతా, బిర్లా, గోయంకా వంటి మహానుభావులెందరో బూరలు, కాశీదారాలు, పిన్నీసుల మొదలు దేన్నీ వదలకుండా తామే అమ్మాలని ముందుకు వస్తున్నారు. వుల్లి పాయలు అమ్మటం కంటే ప్రభుత్వం చేయాల్సిన పనులు చాలా వున్నాయని కబుర్లు చెప్పే చంద్రబాబు నాయుడు వంటి వారు కూడా హెరిటేజ్‌ ఫ్రెష్‌ పేరుతో చచ్చు వుల్లిపాయలు, కూరగాయలు, పాలు అమ్మటానికి వరుసగా దుకాణాలు తెరుస్తూ పోతున్నారు. అంటే ప్రభుత్వం కాదు, మేమే అమ్మి సొమ్ము చేసుకోవాలని అంబానీ మొదలు చంద్రబాబు నాయుడి వరకు అందరూ అనుకుంటున్నట్లే కదా ? రేపు నిర్మించబోయే అమరావతి స్మార్ట్‌ రాజధాని నగరంలో తోపుడు బండ్ల వారి కూరగాయలు,ఆకు కూరలు,వుల్లి పాయల కేకలు మనకు వినపడనిస్తారా ?

విన్నపం: ఈ సైట్‌లో వస్తున్న సమాచారంలో చిన్న నలుసైనా వుపయోగం అనుకుంటున్నారా ? వ్యాఖ్యలు, విమర్శలలో వాస్తవం వుందనుకుంటున్నారా ? మీ అభిప్రాయాలు చెప్పండి ? వాటిని మీరు అభిమానించండి(లైక్‌) మీరు నలుగురితో పంచుకోండి(షేర్‌).

ఇంత వుపోద్ఘాతం ఎందుకంటారా ? పైన చెప్పుకున్న వూట సిద్ధాంతాల ప్రకారం రూపొందించిన విధానాల ప్రకారం( కమ్యూనిస్టులు వాటిని ప్రపంచ బ్యాంకు, ఐఎంఎఫ్‌ ఆదేశితం అంటారు, నరేంద్రమోడీ, చంద్రబాబు వంటి వారు లేదు లేదు అవి పక్కా పదహారణాల మన స్వంత విధానాలంటారు, పేచీ ఎందుకు రెండోవారు చెప్పిందే అంగీకరిద్దాం) సంపదలు వూటమాదిరి కిందికి దిగుతున్నాయా ?

క్రెడిట్‌ సూసీ సంస్ధ ప్రపంచ సంపదల నివేదిక 2015లో వెల్లడించినదాని ప్రకారం మన దేశంలో దిగువ 70శాతం మంది అంటే 87 కోట్ల జనాభాకు వుమ్మడిగా ఎన్ని ఆస్తులు వున్నాయో ఎగువన వున్న వంద మంది ధనికుల వద్ద అన్ని ఆస్తులు పోగుపడ్డాయి. వీరిలో కూడా అత్యంత ధనికుడైన ముకేష్‌ అంబానీ ఒక్కడి సంపదే దిగువ జనాభాలోని 25 కోట్ల మంది ఆస్తికి సమానం. మన సంపదలు కేంద్రీకృతం అవుతున్నాయో ఊట మాదిరి కిందికి దిగుతున్నాయో వేరే చెప్పాలా ? పాయింట్ల వారీ చెప్పాలంటే ఇలా వున్నాయి.

స్వతంత్ర భారత చరిత్రలో తొలిసారిగా ఎగువ జనాభాలోని ఒక శాతం ఆస్తులు 2015లో మొత్తం జనాభా ఆస్తులలో 53శాతానికి చేరాయి. అంతకు ముందు ఏడాదిలో 49శాతం మాత్రమే. ఇది నరేంద్రమోడీ నాయకత్వంలో బిజెపి సాధించిన ఘన విజయాలలో ఒకటి. గత పదిహేను సంవత్సరాలలో ఇంతటి పెరుగుదల లేదన్నది మరొక కలికి తురాయి. నూతన ఆర్ధిక విధానాలు బాగా అమలు జరిగిన పూర్వరంగంలో గత 15సంవత్సరాలలో ఎగువ ఒక శాతపు అపర కుబేరుల సంపద 38 నుంచి 53శాతానికి పెరిగింది.ఈ విధానాలను ప్రవేశ పెట్టిన ఘనత తనదే అని తొలి రోజులలో శాలువా ఎగరేసి చెప్పుకున్న మన పివి నరసింహారావు తన చివరి రోజులలో ఇదేమిటి ఇలా జరిగింది అనుకున్నది ఒకటి అయింది ఒకటి అని చింతించాడంటారు, నిజమెంతో తెలియదు.

ఎగువ పదిశాతంలో మిగిలిన తొమ్మిదిశాతం మంది సంపద 29 నుంచి 23శాతానికి తగ్గగా తొంభైశాతం దిగువ జనాభా సంపద 33 నుంచి 24శాతానికి పడిపోయింది. అందుకే చాలా మంది వున్నవారు కూడా తమకు కలసి రావటం లేదు, కలసి రావటం లేదు అంటూ బాబాలు, స్వామీజీలు, చేతులు చూసి జోస్యం చెప్పేవారు ఎవరు కనపడితే వారి దగ్గరకు కుప్పలు తెప్పలుగా వెళుతున్నారు, చేతి చమురు వదిలించుకుంటున్నారు.

మన ఆర్ధిక వ్యవస్ధలో వున్న పెరుగుదల మొత్తాన్ని ఒక శాతం ధనికులే హాంaఫట్‌ అంటూ లాగించేస్తున్నారని స్పష్టం అవుతోందా లేదా ? గత పదిహేను సంవత్సరాలలో 2.3లక్షల కోట్ల డాలర్ల సంపద సృష్టి అయితే దానిలో ఎగువ ఒక శాతం మందికి 61శాతం, ఎగువ తొమ్మిదిశాతానికి 21, దిగువ 90శాతానికి 18శాతం చేరిందట.మనలో ఎవరికి వారు దేనిలో వున్నామో ఒక్కసారి లెక్కవేసుకుంటే మంచిదేమో !

ఎగువ ఒక శాతం అంటే కోటీ 25 లక్షల మంది(మన జనాభా 125 కోట్లపుడు)లో కేవలం 25లక్ష ల మంది దగ్గర దేశ సంపదలో 40శాతం వుంది. మనదేశంలో మధ్య తరగతి ఎక్కువగా వుందని అందువలన వినిమయ వస్తువులను అమ్ముకొనేందుకు విదేశీ కంపెనీలు పోటీ పడుతున్నాయని ఇప్పటివరకు ఒక అభిప్రాయం వుంది. ఇప్పుడు ఆ మధ్య తరగతి ఎంత మంది అనేది కూడా క్రెడిట్‌ సూసీ నివేదిక అనుమానంలో పడేసింది. నికర సంపద 8.5 నుంచి 85లక్షల రూపాయల మధ్య వున్నవారిని మధ్య తరగతిగా పరిగణిస్తున్నారు.అలాంటి వారు మన దేశంలో ఇప్పుడు మూడు శాతం అంటే 3.75 కోట్ల మంది మాత్రమే వున్నారట. అపైన వున్న ధనికులను కూడా కలపుకుంటే 3.2శాతానికి చేరతారని మిగిలిన వారంతా దిగువ తరగతి వారేనని ఆ నివేదిక చెబుతోంది.

ఈ లెక్కన సంపదలు పోగుపడుతూ వుంటే మరో పన్నెండు సంవత్సరాలలో ఒక శాతం వారి సంపద 75శాతానికి చేరుతుందని అంచనా.అంటే అమెరికాలో మీరు ఒక శాతం మేము 99శాతం అంటూ వాల్‌స్ట్రీట్‌ ఆక్రమణ వుద్యమం ప్రారంభమైనట్లుగా మన దేశంలో కూడా దలాల్‌స్ట్రీట్‌( ముంబైలో వాణిజ్యం జరిగే వీధి) ఆక్రమణ వుద్యమానికి వూట మాదరి జనం మధ్యకు వుద్యమ సందేశం దిగేందుకు మన విధానాలు పునాది వేశాయన్నమాట.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...

మోడీ పెత్తనంలో కొత్తది రాలేదు, వున్నది పోయింది !

04 Monday Jan 2016

Posted by raomk in BJP, Current Affairs, Economics, INDIA, NATIONAL NEWS

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

India economy, India PMI, Narendra Modi

సత్య

మాననీయ ప్రధాని నరేంద్రమోడీ అధికారంలోకి వచ్చి త్వరలో రెండు సంవత్సరాలు పూర్తి కానుంది. అందువలన ఎవరైనా ఇంకా హనీమూన్‌ కాలమనో మరొకటనో కారణాలు చెప్పటానికి లేదు. అసలు ఆయన తన స్వంత జీవితంలోనే కట్టుకున్న భార్యను వదలివేసి ఆర్‌ఎస్‌ఎస్‌ సేవకు అంకితమైన వ్యక్తి. సంసార లంపటానికి దూరంగా వున్న వ్యక్తి. అలాంటి వారు ఇంట్లో కాకుండా ఎక్కువ కాలం బయటే గడుపుతారు. అందువలన దేశాన్నే తన ఇల్లనుకున్నారు గనుక ఎక్కువగా విదేశాల్లో వున్నట్లు కనిపించినా అనిపించినా నిరంతరం తన గుజరాత్‌ మోడల్‌ను దేశం మొత్తం మీద అమలు జరిపేందుకే ఆలోచించారని ఆయన మద్దతుదారులు చెప్పినదాన్ని బట్టి ఇప్పటివరకూ దేశం నమ్ముతోంది. రాయిటర్‌ వార్తా సంస్ధ సోమవారం నాడు వెల్లడించిన సమాచారం ప్రకారం ఆయన ఇచ్చిన మేక్‌ ఇన్‌ ఇండియా పిలుపు మన పారిశ్రామిక రంగాన్ని వుత్తేజ పరిచినట్లు లేదు. కాగా పోగా వున్నదీ పోయిందీ……పోయిందీ అన్నట్లుగా గతరెండు సంవత్సరాలలో మొదటి సారిగా డిసెంబరులో పారిశ్రామిక కార్యకలాపాలు తగ్గినట్లు ఒక సర్వేలో తేలిందన్నది వార్త సారాంశం.

నవంబరులో నికీ పిఎంఐ(పర్చేజింగ్‌ మేనేజర్స్‌ ఇండెక్స్‌) సూచిక నవంబరులో 50.3 వుండగా డిసెంబరులో 28 నెలల కనిష్టం 49.1కి తగ్గినట్లు మార్కిట్‌ అనే ఒక సంస్ధ తయారు చేసిన సమాచారం వెల్లడించింది. మౌన ముని మన్మోహన్‌సింగ్‌ హయాంలో దీనికి పునాది పడిందని చెప్పుకున్నా వర్తమాన స్ధితికి ఎన్నికల ముందు మాటల ముని తరువాత మౌన మునిగా మారిన నరేంద్రమోడీ తప్ప మరొకరు సమాధానం చెప్పేందుకు లేదు.

భారత వస్తువుత్పత్తి రంగం ఏడాది చివరిలో అధోగతి వైపు మళ్లింది, ఇప్పటికే అంతర్గత డిమాండ్‌ అయోమయంలో వుంటే దేశ దక్షిణాదిన వచ్చిన వరదలు మరింతగా దెబ్బతీశాయని మార్కిట్‌ సంస్ధ ఆర్దికవేత్త పోలీయనా డె లిమా వ్యాఖ్యానించారు. వుత్పత్తి వుప సూచిక నవంబరు నెల 50.4తో పోల్చితే డిసెంబరులో 46.8 పాయింట్లకు తగ్గిపోయింది.ఇది 2009 ప్రారంభం తరువాత కనిష్టం. రెండు సంవత్సరాలలో తొలిసారిగా కొత్త ఆర్డర్లు తగ్గిపోయాయి.

ద్రవ్యోల్బణం అదుపులో వుంటే రుణ విధానాన్ని జూన్‌ నాటికి మరింత సరళతరం గావించాలన్న రిజర్వుబ్యాంకు ఆలోచనలను బలహీన అభివృద్ది మరింత కఠినతరం చేసేందుకు తోడ్పడుతుంది. ప్రస్తుతం ద్రవ్యోల్బణం 6.75శాతం వుంది. తాజా సర్వే ప్రకారం పెట్టుబడుల ధరలు పెరిగిన కారణంగా వస్తు వుత్పత్తుల ధరలూ పెరుగుతున్నాయి. నరేంద్రమోడీ చేతిలో 130 కోట్ల సంసారమనే దేశాన్ని పెట్టాం, పారిశ్రామిక వుత్పత్తులే కాదు, ఎగుమతులు కూడా తగ్గిపోతున్నాయని ఇంతకు ముందే వార్తలు వచ్చాయి. కౌపీన సంరక్షణార్ధం సన్యాసి సంసార జంఝాటంలో ఇరుక్కున్న కధ మనకు తెలుసు. నరేంద్రమోడీ సన్యాసో సంసారో తెలియదు గానీ పారిశ్రామిక వుత్పత్తి తగ్గటం అంటే దాని ప్రభావం అన్ని రంగాలు దిగజారటానికి కారణం అవుతుంది.పచ్చని సంసారాలు ఆరిపోతాయి. గోచి కధకు ప్రతికూలంగా జరుగుతుంది.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • More
Like Loading...
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • ఏఐ డేటా సెంటర్లు.. అభివృద్ధి పేరుతో పర్యావరణ ముప్పు
  • భగవత్‌ సుభాషితాలు – ఆచరణలో విరుద్ధతలు!
  • పనిచేయని మోడినోమిక్స్, భారతీయ విజ్ఞానం, చంద్రబాబు, పవన్ కల్యాణ్ భజనలు వృధా – ప్రపంచ ఫ్యాక్టరీగా చైనా మరింత ముందుకు !
  • ఆర్థిక వృద్ధి కంటే అసమానతల పెరుగుదలే ఎక్కువ!
  • కృష్ణా డెల్టాలో నీటి సంక్షోభం – రైతాంగం ఎదుర్కొంటున్న సవాళ్లు, ఆచరణాత్మక పరిష్కారాలు

Recent Comments

SIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunturu's avatarSIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunt… on రాముడి సొమ్ము స్వాహా దర్యాప్తు…
Venugopalrao Nagumothu's avatarVenugopalrao Nagumot… on అసంబద్ద వాదనలు, అడ్డగోలు మాటలు…
Sk mahesh gupta's avatarSk mahesh gupta on శనగ రైతుల సంక్షోభం
pscknr's avatarpscknr on ఆడంతే నమ్మక ద్రోహి అన్న ఇరాన్‌…
pscknr's avatarpscknr on చైనాతో వాణిజ్యంపై ఆందోళన…

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015

Categories

  • Africa
  • AP
  • AP NEWS
  • Asia
  • BJP
  • BRS
  • CHINA
  • Communalism
  • Congress
  • COUNTRIES
  • CPI(M)
  • Current Affairs
  • Economics
  • Education
  • employees
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Farmers
  • Filims
  • Germany
  • Greek
  • Gujarat
  • Health
  • History
  • imperialism
  • INDIA
  • International
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS
  • Japan
  • Latin America
  • Left politics
  • Literature.
  • Loksabha Elections
  • NATIONAL NEWS
  • Opinion
  • Others
  • Pensioners
  • Political Parties
  • Politics
  • Prices
  • Readers News Service
  • RELIGION
  • Religious Intolarence
  • RUSSIA
  • Science
  • Social Inclusion
  • Sports
  • STATES NEWS
  • tdp
  • TDP
  • Telangana
  • Telugu
  • UK
  • Uncategorized
  • USA
  • WAR
  • Women
  • Women
  • Ycp

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • ఏఐ డేటా సెంటర్లు.. అభివృద్ధి పేరుతో పర్యావరణ ముప్పు
  • భగవత్‌ సుభాషితాలు – ఆచరణలో విరుద్ధతలు!
  • పనిచేయని మోడినోమిక్స్, భారతీయ విజ్ఞానం, చంద్రబాబు, పవన్ కల్యాణ్ భజనలు వృధా – ప్రపంచ ఫ్యాక్టరీగా చైనా మరింత ముందుకు !
  • ఆర్థిక వృద్ధి కంటే అసమానతల పెరుగుదలే ఎక్కువ!
  • కృష్ణా డెల్టాలో నీటి సంక్షోభం – రైతాంగం ఎదుర్కొంటున్న సవాళ్లు, ఆచరణాత్మక పరిష్కారాలు

Recent Comments

SIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunturu's avatarSIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunt… on రాముడి సొమ్ము స్వాహా దర్యాప్తు…
Venugopalrao Nagumothu's avatarVenugopalrao Nagumot… on అసంబద్ద వాదనలు, అడ్డగోలు మాటలు…
Sk mahesh gupta's avatarSk mahesh gupta on శనగ రైతుల సంక్షోభం
pscknr's avatarpscknr on ఆడంతే నమ్మక ద్రోహి అన్న ఇరాన్‌…
pscknr's avatarpscknr on చైనాతో వాణిజ్యంపై ఆందోళన…

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015

Categories

  • Africa
  • AP
  • AP NEWS
  • Asia
  • BJP
  • BRS
  • CHINA
  • Communalism
  • Congress
  • COUNTRIES
  • CPI(M)
  • Current Affairs
  • Economics
  • Education
  • employees
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Farmers
  • Filims
  • Germany
  • Greek
  • Gujarat
  • Health
  • History
  • imperialism
  • INDIA
  • International
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS
  • Japan
  • Latin America
  • Left politics
  • Literature.
  • Loksabha Elections
  • NATIONAL NEWS
  • Opinion
  • Others
  • Pensioners
  • Political Parties
  • Politics
  • Prices
  • Readers News Service
  • RELIGION
  • Religious Intolarence
  • RUSSIA
  • Science
  • Social Inclusion
  • Sports
  • STATES NEWS
  • tdp
  • TDP
  • Telangana
  • Telugu
  • UK
  • Uncategorized
  • USA
  • WAR
  • Women
  • Women
  • Ycp

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Social

  • View mannem.koteswararao’s profile on Facebook
  • View mannemkoteswara’s profile on Twitter

Recent Posts

  • ఏఐ డేటా సెంటర్లు.. అభివృద్ధి పేరుతో పర్యావరణ ముప్పు
  • భగవత్‌ సుభాషితాలు – ఆచరణలో విరుద్ధతలు!
  • పనిచేయని మోడినోమిక్స్, భారతీయ విజ్ఞానం, చంద్రబాబు, పవన్ కల్యాణ్ భజనలు వృధా – ప్రపంచ ఫ్యాక్టరీగా చైనా మరింత ముందుకు !
  • ఆర్థిక వృద్ధి కంటే అసమానతల పెరుగుదలే ఎక్కువ!
  • కృష్ణా డెల్టాలో నీటి సంక్షోభం – రైతాంగం ఎదుర్కొంటున్న సవాళ్లు, ఆచరణాత్మక పరిష్కారాలు

Recent Comments

SIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunturu's avatarSIVARAMAKRISHNA Gunt… on రాముడి సొమ్ము స్వాహా దర్యాప్తు…
Venugopalrao Nagumothu's avatarVenugopalrao Nagumot… on అసంబద్ద వాదనలు, అడ్డగోలు మాటలు…
Sk mahesh gupta's avatarSk mahesh gupta on శనగ రైతుల సంక్షోభం
pscknr's avatarpscknr on ఆడంతే నమ్మక ద్రోహి అన్న ఇరాన్‌…
pscknr's avatarpscknr on చైనాతో వాణిజ్యంపై ఆందోళన…

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015

Categories

  • Africa
  • AP
  • AP NEWS
  • Asia
  • BJP
  • BRS
  • CHINA
  • Communalism
  • Congress
  • COUNTRIES
  • CPI(M)
  • Current Affairs
  • Economics
  • Education
  • employees
  • Environment
  • Europe
  • Farmers
  • Filims
  • Germany
  • Greek
  • Gujarat
  • Health
  • History
  • imperialism
  • INDIA
  • International
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS
  • Japan
  • Latin America
  • Left politics
  • Literature.
  • Loksabha Elections
  • NATIONAL NEWS
  • Opinion
  • Others
  • Pensioners
  • Political Parties
  • Politics
  • Prices
  • Readers News Service
  • RELIGION
  • Religious Intolarence
  • RUSSIA
  • Science
  • Social Inclusion
  • Sports
  • STATES NEWS
  • tdp
  • TDP
  • Telangana
  • Telugu
  • UK
  • Uncategorized
  • USA
  • WAR
  • Women
  • Women
  • Ycp

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • vedika
    • Join 240 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • vedika
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d