ధర్మం కంటే కాలుష్య అధర్మం నుంచి గేట్స్‌కు లాభాలు ఎక్కువ

Tags

, ,

ధర్మకర్తృత్వం-దాతల బండారం-5

ఎం కోటేశ్వరరావు

బలి ఇస్తే లంకెబిందెలు దొరుకుతాయని మోసగాళ్లు చెప్పిన మాట విని జంతువులనే కాదు ఏకంగా పిల్లలనే బలి ఇచ్చేవారిని చూస్తున్నాము. దాన ధర్మాలు చేస్తే పుణ్యం వస్తుందని నమ్మేవారు ఆ మార్గంలో పుణ్యం పొందాలంటే ఏం చేయాలి పర్మనెంటుగా తమ ముందు చేయిచాచే వారిని తయారు చేసుకుంటూ వుండాలి. మెక్సికోకు చెందిన కార్లోస్‌ సిమ్‌ ఇప్పుడు ప్రపంచంలో అందరికంటే ఎక్కువ ధనవంతుడు. అమెరికన్‌ బిల్‌గేట్స్‌ను మించిపోయాడు. అతగాడు దాతృత్వాన్ని ఒక పండ్ల చెట్లతో పోల్చాడు. మీరు పండ్ల చెట్లను దగ్గర వుంచుకొని పండ్లు మాత్రమే దానం చేయాలి తప్ప చెట్లను కాదు అన్నాడు. ఇతనితో సహా ధనవంతులు మరింత ధనవంతులు కావటాన్ని పేదలు మరింత పేదలుగా సంపదల పంపిణీలో అసమానతలను చూపే ప్రస్తుత వ్యవస్ధ తప్ప మరొకటి కాదు. అందుకే థామస్‌ పికెట్టి అనే ఫ్రెంచి ఆర్ధిక వేత్త ప్రపంచ ధనికులను హెచ్చరించాడు. ఇటీవలి కాలంలో ఎన్నడూ లేని విధంగా ఆర్ధిక అసమానతలు పెరిగాయి, ఇది సామాజిక అశాంతికి దారితీస్తుందని ముందస్తు హెచ్చరిక చేశాడు. అసమానతలు పెరిగాయని అంగీకరిస్తే దానికి కారణాలేమిటో చెప్పమని జనం నిలదీస్తారు. అప్పుడు విధానాల గురించి, పెట్టుబడిదారీ విధానమా, కమ్యూనిజమా ఏది కారణం అన్న చర్చ వస్తుంది. నూటికి 99 వేళ్లు పెట్టుబడిదారీ విధానంవైపే చూపుతాయి. అందువలన అనేక మంది పెట్టుబడిదారులు పికెట్టి మరీ ఎక్కువ చెప్పాడని తప్పించుకుంటున్నారు తప్ప చర్చలోకి దిగటం లేదు. లేదు అంటే వర్తమాన ఆర్ధిక సంక్షోభాలు ఏమిటి? దానికి కారణాలు ఏమిటని నిలదీస్తారు.అప్పుడూ అదే చర్చ జరపాలి. అందువలన ఈ త్రైమాసికం చూడూ ఈ త్రైమాసికం చూడు నీకు అభివృద్ది కనిపిస్తుంది అని గత ఏడు సంవత్సరాలుగా చెబుతూనే వున్నారు. బ్రిటీష్‌ విక్టోరియా రాణి కాలం 1837-1901 మధ్య కాలానికి నేటికి ఆదాయ అసమానతలు ఎలా వున్నాయో కొందరు చెబుతున్నారు. ఆ కాలంలో కేవలం 46 సంవత్సరాలు మాత్రమే బతికి ప్రఖ్యాత రచయిత ఆస్కార్‌ వైల్డ్‌ తన కాలంలోని దాతృత్వ తీరుతెన్నులను వర్ణించాడు.నాటి ధనవంతులు కూడా సమాజంలో ఇంత దారిద్య్రం వుందా, పేదలకు ఇన్ని కష్టాలు వున్నాయా అని మన బిల్‌గేట్స్‌, వారెన్‌బఫెట్‌, మార్క్‌ జుకెర్‌ బర్గ్‌ మాదిరిగానే పీపాల కొద్దీ కన్నీళ్లు కార్చారు. వైల్డ్‌ ఏమన్నారంటే నాటి ధనవంతులు సూచించిన పరిష్కార మార్గాలు సమాజంలోని జబ్బును నయం చేయలేదు, మరికొంత కాలం పొడిగించాయి. తగిన లక్ష్యం లేకపోతే దారిద్య్రాన్ని నిర్మూలించటం అసాధ్యం అన్నాడు.

సైన్స్‌ ఇన్‌ సొసైటీ సంస్ధ డైరెక్టర్‌ , జెనిటిస్ట్‌, బయోఫిజిస్ట్‌ అయిన డాక్టర్‌ మాయే వాన్‌ హో ఏ చెప్పారంటే ఏ సమస్యలనైతే తాను పరిష్కరిస్తానని బయలు దేరిందో ఆ పెద్ద ధార్మిక సంస్ధ వాటికి కారణమైన కంపెనీలలో పెద్ద మొత్తంలో పెట్టుబడులు పెట్టి లాభాలు సంపాదిస్తోందని అన్నారు. ఆ సంస్ధ మంజూరు చేసే గ్రాంట్ల వలన ప్రపంచ ఆరోగ్యం, వ్యవసాయ వ్యవస్ధకు హానితప్ప మేలు జరగటం లేదు, జాతీయ, ప్రపంచ ప్రాధాన్యతలను వక్రీకరిస్తున్నది. గేట్స్‌ ఫౌండేషన్‌ 2000 సంవత్సరంలో 2006లో రెట్టింపైంది. వారెన్‌బఫెట్‌ చేరిక దీనికి కారణం. మంచి పనులకు వీరు భారీ మొత్తంలో నిధులు ఇవ్వటంలో పేరు పొందారు. అయితే అదే సందర్భంలో మంచి పనుల కంటే దాని పెట్టుబడులపై భారీ మొత్తాలలో లాభాలు సంపాదిస్తున్నదని 2007 అమెరికాకు చెందిన లాస్‌ ఏంజల్స్‌ టైమ్స్‌ వెల్లడించింది. ఇచ్చిన గ్రాంట్లకంటే చమురు కంపెనీలలో దాని పెట్టుబడులు ఎక్కువ. నైజీరియాలోని పిల్లలు టీకాలతో లబ్దపొందినప్పటికీ గేట్స్‌ ఫౌండేషన్‌, ఇతర ధార్మిక సంస్ధలు పెట్టుబడులు పెట్టిన చమురు బావుల నుంచి వెలువడే వాయువుల కారణంగా తీవ్రమైన శ్వాసకోశ సంబంధ వ్యాధుల బారిన పడ్డారు. నైగర్‌ డెల్టాలో చమురు బావుల నుంచి వెలువడిన మంటల కారణంగా పెద్ద వారిలో బ్రాంకోటైస్‌ పిల్లలలో ఆస్త్మా, కంటి చూపు సరిగా కనిపించకపోవటం వంటి సమస్యలు తలెత్తాయని ఎనోచా ప్రాంతంలోని ఒక వైద్యుడు చెప్పారు. అంతేకాదు ఈ ప్రాంతంలోని గ్యాస్‌ బావుల నుంచి రోజూ దాదాపు వంద కోట్ల ఘనపుటడుగుల గ్యాస్‌ను మండిస్తారు. దాని అమ్మకంద్వారా కలిగే ప్రయోజనం ఎంతో తెలియదు గానీ ప్రపంచ వాతావరణం వేడెక్కటానికి ఇవి దోహదం చేస్తున్నాయి. గేట్స్‌ ఫౌండేషన్‌ పోలియో, ఇతర టీకాలకు, పరిశోధనలకు ప్రపంచవ్యాపితంగా 218 మిలియన్‌ డాలర్లు దానం చేస్తే నైజీరియాలోని ఎని, రాయల్‌ డచ్‌, షెల్‌, ఎక్సాస్‌ మోబిల్‌ కార్పొరేషన్‌ , చెవరాన్‌, టోటల్‌ వంటివాటిలో 423 మిలియన్‌ డాలర్లు పెట్టుబడులుగా పెట్టిందని లాస్‌ఏంజల్స్‌ టైమ్స్‌ తెలిపింది. అమెరికా, ఐరోపాలలో అనుమతించిన దానికంటే ఎక్కువగా కాలుష్యం వెదజల్లేందుకు ఈ కంపెనీలకు అక్కడ అనుమతి ఇచ్చారు.

గేట్స్‌ ఫౌండేషన్‌ తాను ఎయిడ్స్‌ సమస్యపై పోరాడుతున్నానని చెప్పుకుంటోందో అది పెట్టుబడి పెట్టిన నైజీరియాలోని ఆయిల్‌ కంపెనీల కార్యకలాపాల కారణంగా తమ ప్రాంతంలో వ్యభిచారం తీవ్రంగా పెరిగిందని, దాని కారణంగా ఎయిడ్స్‌, తరుణవయస్సు యువతులు గర్భందాల్చటం వంటి సమస్యలు పెరిగాయని స్ధానికులు పేర్కొన్నారు. దారిద్య్రం, వ్యాధుల నిర్మూలన గురించి గేట్స్‌ ఫౌండేషన్‌ చెబుతుంటుంది. అది పెట్టుబడులు పెట్టిన చమురు కంపెనీలు తవ్విన చమురు బోర్ల గుంతలలో నిల్వవుండే నీరు నింపుతారు. దాంతో దోమలు తామరతంపరగా వృద్ధి చెంది మలేరియా పెరిగిపోతోంది. రివర్స్‌ స్టేట్‌లోని ఆరోగ్య కమిషనర్‌ దర్యాప్తు చేయించగా నదులలో చమురు తెట్టుల కారణంగా కలరా వస్తున్నట్లు తేలింది. విషపదార్ధాల నుంచి వెలువడే బెంజైన్‌, మెర్క్యురీ, క్రోమియం వంటివి పిల్లలలో వ్యాధినిరోధక శక్తిని తగ్గించి మరింతగా పోలియో, మీజిల్స్‌ వంటివి సోకటానికి దోహదం చేస్తున్నాయి.

గేట్స్‌ ఫౌండేషన్‌ పెట్టుబడులు పెట్టిన బిపి షేర్లు 83, రాయల్‌డచ్‌ 77, ఆంగ్లో-అమెరికన్‌ కంపెనీల వాటాల ధరలు 255 శాతం పెరిగాయి.మసాచుచెట్స్‌ విశ్వవిద్యాలయం రూపొందించిన జాబితా ప్రకారం అమెరికాలోని అత్యంత కాలుష్యకారక పరిశ్రమలు వంద, కెనడాలోని 50లో 330 కోట్ల డాలర్ల మేరకు గేట్స్‌ పెట్టుబడులు వున్నాయి. అంటే కాలుష్యం నుంచి కూడా ధర్మాత్ముడు గేట్స్‌ లాభాలు పిండుకుంటున్నాడన్నమాట.

CORRUPTION IN JUDICIARY WILL NOT BE TOLERATED: CJI THAKUR

Tags

, ,

Corruption in judiciary will not be tolerated: CJI Thakur

Chief Justice of India Tirath Singh Thakur (Photo – The Hindu)

New Delhi, 06 Dec 2015: Chief Justice of India Tirath Singh Thakur on Sunday asserted that there would be no tolerance towards deviant behaviour and corruption by judges.

“We will be intolerant towards deviant behaviour and allegations of corruption and cleanse the institution,” he said on being asked about allegations of corruption against certain judges in the course of his interaction with media persons after assuming office as the CJI.

On being asked about Justice C.S. Karnan of Madras High Court who has been at loggerheads with his chief justice, Chief Justice Thakur, without mentioning any individual judge, said: “We will take note of it and take corrective action for any deviant behaviour coming (from judiciary) from Kashmir to Kanyakumari.”

“The system must react to what is not acceptable. We should not remain quiet on what is not acceptable,” he said, indicating the course that the top judiciary would take in dealing with errant judges during his tenure which would last just over a year.

Citing the difficulties in dealing with deviant judges, Chief Justice Thakur pointed out that “in case of doubtful situation, the benefit of doubt would go to the institution (of judiciary) and not to the individual”.

He said there were some misgivings about how certain judges conduct themselves and that brings into question the issue of credibility.

A strong and independent judiciary was capable of protecting people from attacks on the inclusive values of Indian society, Chief Justice T.S. Thakur said .

“As the head of the institution that upholds the rule of law and protects the constitution, the right of all sections of people will be protected,” Chief Justice Thakur said in his first media meet after assuming charge of the Supreme Court.

“Our existence is itself based on tolerance,” he said, wondering how some political people can twist it to their advantage.

Assuring that judiciary was there to protect and safeguard their rights, the chief justice said: “We are capable of protecting the rights of all sections of the people. It is our responsibility. Rule of law and constitutional guarantees are enshrined (in the constitution).

“What to talk of citizens, rights of all the people will be protected. There is nothing to fear.” He added: “The rule of law is even for non-citizens.”

Chief Justice Thakur said: “Itna badha desh hai, kuchh awaaj to uththi hai” (It is such a big country. Some discordant notes will be there.)

So long there was rule of law, constitutional guarantees and an independent judiciary, “tab tak kisi baat ka dar nahin hona chaiye” (till then one should not fear anything).

Pointing to the long, rich and all-inclusive traditions of India, he said: “This country has been a home for all religions of the world. People who were persecuted in other places have come here and flourished.”

Describing it as “our heritage”, Chief Justice Thakur gave the example of Parsis who came from Persia saying they gave India the best industrialists and “finest legal minds” — referring to Nani Palkiwala and Fali Nariman. (IANS)

Death By Coconut: A Story Of Food Obsession Gone Too Far

Tags

, ,

It is an interesting story picked for VEDIKA readers from NPR

Death By Coconut: A Story Of Food Obsession Gone Too Far

German nudist August Engelhardt sits in front of his thatched tent-like hut on the island of Kabakon (in what is now Papua New Guinea) with the books that he brought with him from Germany. In 1902, he moved to the South Pacific to start a utopian cult that revolved around two orbs: the coconut and the sun.

German nudist August Engelhardt sits in front of his thatched tent-like hut on the island of Kabakon (in what is now Papua New Guinea) with the books that he brought with him from Germany. In 1902, he moved to the South Pacific to start a utopian cult that revolved around two orbs: the coconut and the sun.

Courtesy of Christian Kracht, author of Imperium

The coconut has developed a bit of a faddish following in the West.

Today, devotees add coconut oil to coffee, dab it on acne and, following Gwyneth Paltrow’s example, swirl it around in their mouths to fight tooth decay. Starbucks has launched a coconut-milk latte. And the coconut-water business has surged to $400 million, with a little help from Madonna and Rihanna.

No one would be more delighted at the coconut’s rising star than August Engelhardt, a sun-worshipping German nudist and history’s most radical cocovore.

From 1902 to 1919, Engelhardt lived on a beautiful South Pacific island, eating nothing but the fruit of Cocos nucifera, which he believed was the panacea for all mankind’s woes. Except that a coconut mono-diet proved to be a terrible idea. At the end of his life, der Kokovore was reduced to a mentally ill, rheumatic, severely malnourished sack of bones with ulcers on his legs. He was only 44.

Engelhardt was resurrected from near-oblivion by Swiss writer Christian Kracht’s marvelous 2012 novel, Imperium: A Fiction of the South Seas, which fictionalizes the German cocovore’s bizarre and poignant story. The English translation by Daniel Bowles was published this year in the U.S. to fine reviews.

Kracht’s interest in Engelhardt was sparked by a chance encounter. One day at a yard sale in Murnau, Germany, he came across a sepia-tinted postcard of a scrawny, bearded man in a checked loincloth standing under a palm tree.

“He looked like a proto-hippie, and very modern,” Kracht told The Salt. “I really wanted to get to know this person. But there was nothing known about him at the time — no Wikipedia page (there is one now) or anything at all. The only thing I could find was a thesis by a student at the University of Auckland. So I went and met him in New Zealand, but somehow it wasn’t enough.”

The novelist in Kracht was itching “to embroider Engelhardt’s life story,” especially “since coconuts are intrinsically funny.” Imperium, a stylish satire, invents meetings with Thomas Mann and Kafka, and ends with a leprosy-afflicted Engelhardt eating his own thumb.

But even without a stich of embroidery, Engelhardt’s story beggars belief.

Born in Nuremberg in 1875, August Engelhardt was among the disaffected youngsters drawn to the back-to-nature Lebensreform (Life Reform) movement sweeping through Germany and Switzerland at the time. Its proponents yearned after an unspoiled Eden where people ate vegetables and raw food.

Engelhardt was especially taken by Gustav Schlickeysen’s 1877 dietary treatise, Fruit and Bread: A Scientific Diet. Influenced by Darwinism, the book claimed that since the natural food of apes was uncooked food and grain, that was also “the proper food for man.”

Engelhardt took it even further: For him, even bread and fruit were tainted. In his mind, the only immaculate and mystical fleshpot was the coconut, with its snowy white meat and translucent water.

In 1898, he and fellow vegetarian August Bethmann laid out their vision in a pamphlet called A Carefree Future: The New Gospel.

As the pamphlet’s grandiose subtitle makes plain, Engelhardt’s ambitions of a Coconut Camelot, with himself as a nude King Arthur, were driven by much more than dietary compulsions: His was a spiritual quest.

“He believed that since the coconut grew high up in the tree, closest to God and closest to the sun, it was godlike,” says Kracht. “And since it had hair and looked like a human head, he thought it came closest to being a man. According to his rather crackpot theory, to be a cocovore was to be a theophage — or eater of God.”

But being the custodian of these paradisiacal ideas in stuffy steak-and-sausage Germany was no fun. “He chafed against the constraints of Wilhelminian Germany, which was very Victorian,” says Kracht. “One can imagine what a misfit a nudist-vegetarian with a very, very long beard would be in this repressive society. He was ridiculed and wanted to get away.”

August Engelhardt stands underneath a palm tree with Berlin concert pianist Max Lützow at his feet. Lützow went to Kabakon to join Engelhardt’s sun-worshipping cocovore cult, The Order of the Sun. He died there, as did several other followers.

Courtesy of Christian Kracht, author of Imperium

In 1902, Engelhardt boarded a ship with his library of books and sailed to the Bismarck Archipelago (now Papua New Guinea), where he bought a plantation on the island of Kabakon. He built himself a thatched hut, began to trade in coconut oil and prepared to establish his cult, called Sonnenorden (Order of the Sun).

The short-lived cult revolved around two orbs: the coconut and the sun. Soon, Engelhardt’s co-author, Bethmann, joined him, and together they wrote up passionate advertorials that were printed in Germany. Have no fear of malaria, they assured their readers: The coconut is more effective than quinine.

At least 15 young Germans, seduced by the fantasy of a tropical idyll where they didn’t have to shave, went out to join them. Among them was a Berlin concert pianist, Max Lützow, seen in the picture at Engelhardt’s feet.

It ended calamitously. Several cultists — including Bethmann and Lützow — died, while others returned to Germany malarial and furious. Eventually, the local German governor banned any more adventurers from joining.

Left alone, Engelhardt was unfazed. “The coconut is the Philosopher’s Stone,” he said. “What are universities in comparison to such a lifestyle?” In 1905, The New York Times carried a story on him titled, “Failure of a Womanless Eden in the Pacific—A Strange Story from the South Seas.”

Kracht’s title Imperium has an ironic double meaning: the absolute power of the coconut in Engelhardt’s philosophy, and the imperialism of Germany. Even a dreamer like Engelhardt must have known that his peculiar lifestyle was enabled only by German colonialism. The privileged status he enjoyed on Kabakon was akin to that enjoyed by the ivory trader Kurtz in Joseph Conrad’s great critique of colonialism,Heart of Darkness.

“Engelhardt was ultimately a white colonizer, so the local people were made to accept that and not question his authority,” says Kracht. “He couldn’t simply be naked in Germany; he would be arrested.”

But unlike the ruthless and abusive Kurtz, Engelhardt, whom Kracht calls “a thwarted artist,” comes across as a pitiable, even likeable, eccentric.

There is, however, an uneasy resonance between the purity-and-utopia-obsessed cocovore and another German, whose insanity, says a sardonic Kracht, “was not in a nutshell but on a larger level.” The novel makes the Hitler allegory explicit, stating that if “parallels arise with a later German romantic and vegetarian who perhaps ought to have remained at his easel, then this is entirely intentional.”

It’s easy to laugh at Engelhardt — and yet, his fixation on eating a dangerously narrow “pure” and healthy diet has echoes in modern times.

At the end, Engelhardt weighed just 66 pounds and became a freak show for tourists. Imprisoned by Australian soldiers during World War I, he returned to Kabakon after his release and was reportedly found dead on the beach in 1919, though Kracht says no one knows for sure when or where he died.

When Kracht visited Kabakon for his research in 2010, he found no trace of imperial Germany. “No Lutheran churches, nothing. The Japanese blew everything up in the second world war,” he says.

What survive are the sun, the coconuts, the mosquitoes and the legend of Le Morte D’August — a cautionary tale on the perils of food fanaticism.


Nina Martyris is a freelance journalist based in Knoxville, Tenn.

THE BLACK BOOK OF CAPITALISM

Tags

, , ,

Anti communists are always branding communists as genocides  and misleading the peoples with false propaganda. They believe in Goebbels, the facts are not true,  But who is really genocides, look into …..

THE BLACK BOOK OF CAPITALISM

Rwandan GenocideMost Americans today think that communism has been one of the most genocidal ideologies in human history. Many are misinformed by anti-communist propaganda stating that we have killed over 100 million people when in fact this is not true remotely. I will save that for another time today we are here to discuss the deaths caused by capitalism.

In India when the English colonized India in the 19 century they tried to make it as profitable as possible this included making the Indian farmers switch from food production to cotton production this lead to a massive famine that killed 30 million people in India.

While in America we were undergoing one of the best examples of ethnic cleansing to date. The forced removal of the Native Americans from their homelands resulted in over 14 million people dying and the rest forced to live on reservations. All this done because a need for raw resources, required more land.  All those keeping track at home this brings the count to 44 million dead and we haven’t even got into the 20th century.

An examination of imperial Russia shows that because of a lack of modernization and greedy hoarding done by capitalist and nobles lead to routine famine called the “hungry years” leading to countless deaths and starvation. This continued until the 1920-1930 through which the collectivization of agriculture by Soviet Union lead to less deaths and ended widespread starvation. When China was under the Qing dynasty, British merchants illegally sold opium. A 3 year long war resulted which ended in China’s defeat. This left hundreds of thousands dead the results of the war lead to Te Tai Ping rebellion. A famine later happened due to the countless fighting, corruption and bad weather again this death toll is incalculable.

The exploitation of the African people who due to the domination of foreign governments where second-class citizens in their own country. When African nations finally became independent from imperialist rule the Europeans left Africa in a “cookie cutter” state. Meaning that nations where drawn out on a map without consideration of the local ethnicity. Which lead to many civil wars including the famous one in Rwanda where 800,000 lost their lives due to imperialist favoritism. The international world did nothing to stop this atrocity.

In Yugoslavia with lack of care from the international world the government collapsed due to pressure put on them by the World Bank and the IMF lead to war within the country. Now this article leaves out many things that also happened under capitalist rule that is because it is nearly impossible to figure out the total death toll if you may know any more events please feel free to comment.

From Peoples World

Communists closely trailed LDP in fundraising in 2014

Tags

, ,

The Japanese Communist Party was close behind the ruling Liberal Democratic Party in political fundraising last year, a Jiji Press survey has found.

The LDP, the top earner among Japanese political parties, raised ¥56.1 billion in 2014, up 4 percent from the previous year, according to the survey released Saturday.

The JCP came next with ¥49.3 billion, up 1.6 percent. The rise reflected an increase in the presence in the Diet of the party, which added seats in the House of Councilors election in 2013 and the House of Representatives election in 2014.

The two were the only ones among the major political parties that enjoyed funding growth last year.

The total amount of funds raised by political parties and organizations in 2014 stood at ¥229.9 billion, down 0.7 percent.

Komeito, the LDP’s partner in the ruling coalition, saw its funds slump 13.9 percent to ¥17.9 billion, ranking third among the parties surveyed.

The main opposition Democratic Party of Japan followed with ¥16.4 billion, down 13.7 percent. The weakness reflects slow progress in the recovery of the party’s strength since it fell from power in 2012.

Ishin no To (Japan Innovation Party), created last year, raised ¥3.6 billion, against ¥2.1 billion earned by the Jisedai no To (Party for Future Generations), also formed last year.

Revenue drops were reported by existing major parties such as the Social Democratic Party, the Seikatsu no To (People’s Life Party) and the Shinto Kaikaku (New Renaissance Party).

The total spending by the Japanese political parties and organizations last year stood at ¥223.4 billion, down 4.5 percent.

Among the Cabinet members, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was the third-biggest earner with ¥180 million. The top earner was Finance Minister Taro Aso with ¥196 million, followed by the economic revitalization minister, Akira Amari, with ¥181 million.

Abe ranked top among the leaders of major political parties. People’s Life Party head Ichiro Ozawa slipped to the third place with ¥117 million after holding the top slot for two years.

The survey covered political funding reports submitted to the prefectural election boards across Japan by Saturday, as well as those presented to the internal affairs minister, which were disclosed on Nov. 27.

A Chavista victory in Venezuela will be “fraud” to the opposition

Tags

, , ,

Maduro

CARACAS, Venezuela – By the time you read this – presumably on Monday, Dec. 7 – the results of Venezuela’s nationwide elections for its National Assembly will likely be known to the world.

But as I write, two days before this decisive vote, let me share some thoughts about the process – and about the prognosis.

I have made this trip to Caracas – and later in the week to other sites in Venezuela – with a group of North American activists and writers concerned about learning the truth of what is happening in this country. These elections, two years after Nicolas Maduro very narrowly won the presidency as successor to the late Hugo Chavez, will determine if the Bolivarian process that Chavez initiated in 1998 will be given the chance to advance. If the right-wing opposition – widely reported to be favored and financed by the U.S. and other capitalist powers – wins on Sunday, Dec. 6, progress could be stopped in its tracks with dire consequences for the vast majority of the Venezuelan people.

In the weeks before leaving the U.S. to come here, everything I read in the U.S. corporate media pointed to a loss for the Chavista movement. Venezuelans, these reports assured, had become tired of the shortages of basic goods and staples in the stores, frustrated with everyday violence, outraged by sky-high inflation that makes nonsense of any efforts at price stabilization, and confused by the privately-owned media that pours out a constant blast of criticism of the government’s supposed incompetence.

Frankly, I arrived expecting in a few days to witness “the beginning of the end,” that moment on Dec. 6 when a majority of Venezuelans would decide to put a halt to the whole Bolivarian experiment, make a lame duck of President Maduro, and perhaps prepare the ground for his impeachment, and throw their fates to the waiting opposition.

Now, after a few days here, I am not at all convinced this will happen. If indeed the Chavistas win, which many people we have met so far are sure will be the case, count on the opposition to immediately start yelling “Fraud!” to whoever will listen. The mass media and politicians in the imperialist countries will readily come to the opposition’s defense, for they already “know” all about the origins of the crisis in Chavez’ utopian scheme to tilt his country away from dependency on the U.S., and to lead the rest of Latin America toward a self-sufficiency that is free – what a crazy concept! – from U.S.-dominated Western Hemispheric trade alliances and investment loans.

The justification for “humanitarian” intervention – to save Venezuela from its “corrupt elections” and bring the country back into the capitalist fold – has already been carefully established. After all, did not our own President Barack Obama, just a few months ago, declare Venezuela to be an immediate and extraordinary threat to the vital security of the United States and place certain Venezuelan officials on persona non grata status? Although other Latin American nations forced him to retract this statement, the anti-Chavista fever can easily be stoked up again.

The problem is that Venezuela’s electoral process has been analyzed and studied by numerous world bodies and private NGOs, such as the Carter Center, and found to be among the fairest, most democratic, and most fastidiously enforced on the planet. Hugo Chavez was no dictator: He was voted in by enthusiastic majorities time after time. That is what’s so galling to the banksters and loan sharks who have dictated U.S. policy in the hemisphere for so many decades and who now fear the jig may be up.

Our little group of nine met for three hours, on our first full day in the country, with officials of the CNE – Consejo Nacional Electoral, or National Elections Commission – in their busy offices just days before the momentous vote. CNE staff, including the rectora principal, the director Tania D’amelio Cardiet, patiently answered every question we posed. They appeared eager to have their work reliably reported in our media.

In the first place, the CNE directors are appointed to overlapping seven-year terms by the National Assembly. It is autonomous from the government, and only accountable to the specific, detailed electoral law of the land. Venezuela has a plethora of political parties, some running together as a Chavista unity slate with the same candidates (think “fusion parties” in the U.S.), others going it alone. The Chavista slate includes the large socialist PSUV (Maduro’s party) as well as the PCV, the Communist Party of Venezuela. Each of the 23 states in the country, plus the Distrito Capital (Caracas), has its own concatenation of parties, each state entitled to the number of National Assembly members according to its population.

The total number of National Assembly members is 167, of whom 113 are voted in on the strength of their own names, 51 elected from party lists according to the popularity of those parties in the overall voting, and 3 seats designated for Indigenous peoples.

At the time Hugo Chavez was first elected in 1998, some 28 percent of eligible voters were not registered. Now only 3 percent are unregistered. In presidential elections 80 percent of the approximately 19.5 million voters in the country vote; for National Assembly elections the turnout is over 70 percent. Even in elections for much lower offices the turnout is around 60 percent.

Demographically, 51 percent of voters are women, and almost 4 million are young voters 18-30). Women enter their “senior” years in Venezuela at age 55, with the right to start receiving a pension, and men at age 60. Some of us “seniors” in our study group qualify to ride the modern, efficient Metro system in Caracas for free.

Once voters arrive at one of the 14,515 polling sites around the country, where qualified officials run 40,601 separate precinct tables, they identify themselves with their national ID card, place their thumb into a machine which reads their fingerprint, thus confirming who they are, and enter the voting booth where they have up to 6 minutes to cast their electronic ballot (most people take under a minute). When they finish, they receive a printout of their vote to confirm their choices, and they deposit this slip into the ballot box. At the end of the day the electronic vote and the paper ballots should match exactly. Witnesses from the participating parties are entitled to observe this entire process to certify its veracity.

Not entirely as a parenthetical note, readers should know that presumably voters going to the polls are completely sober: There is no liquor legally sold throughout the country for three days, from 6 p.m. Friday through Sunday – not even to us innocent visiting non-nationals!

Immediately after the votes are recorded and reported, an automatic audit takes place of 53.3 percent of all the precincts, randomly chosen from around the country, to spot any conceivable irregularities. Within a few weeks a 100 percent audit takes place. All parties in the elections have signed on to these carefully thought-out and elegantly devised mechanisms, regarded – to repeat myself – as among the most democratic in the world.

Later in the day, we attended the huge public rally officially closing the electoral campaign, where Maduro spoke and revved up his thousands of supporters in the capital, a flock of colorful flags and banners proudly whipping in the breeze, the red-shirted crowds gaily chanting, singing and cheering. Their infectious joy helped to persuade me that this election is very much up for grabs. A Chavista win is hardly out of the question!

Whatever the result on Dec. 6, whether a victory for the Bolivarian Revolution or for its opposition, you can be assured that there was no question of fraud. If you hear that claim, don’t believe it, and start asking serious questions of anyone making it. It ain’t so.

From Peoples World

Ambedkar For Our Times!

Tags

,

by

( Till 1992, 6 th December was remembered as ‘Parinirvan Divas’ of Dr Ambedkar, legendary son of the oppressed who had clearly recognised the true meaning of Hindutva and warned his followers about the dangers of Hindu Rashtra ; post 1992, 6 th December has an added meaning and it relates to the demolition of Babri Mosque undertaken by these very forces.

Apart from the fact that this event led to the biggest communal conflagaration at the national level post-independence, whose repercussions are still being felt and whose perpetrators are still roaming free, we should not forget that it was the first biggest attack on the principles of secularism and democracy, which has been a core value of the Constitution drafted under the Chairmanship of Dr Ambedkar.

What follows here is an edited version of the presentation made at Dept of Social Work, Delhi University, during their programme centred around 1 st Ambedkar Memorial Lecture)

 

“If Hindu Raj does become a fact, it will no doubt, be the greatest calamity for this country. No matter what the Hindus say, Hinduism is a menace to liberty, equality and fraternity. On that account it is incompatible with democracy. Hindu Raj must be prevented at any cost.”

– Ambedkar, Pakistan or Partition of India, p. 358

‘Indians today are governed by two ideologies. Their political ideal set in the preamble of the constitution affirms a life of liberty, equality and fraternity whereas their social ideal embedded in their religion denies it to them’

– Ambedkar

..This is the 1 st Ambedkar memorial lecture which is being organised, as the invite tells us, saluting ‘ the contribution of the great visionary leader who not only fought for political revolution but also argued for social revolution’. Let me add that you have made this beginning at an opportune moment in our country’s history when we are witnessing a concerted attempt from the powers that be to water down Ambedkar’s legacy, project him as someone who rather sanctioned the illiberal times we live in today, communicate to the masses that he was friends with leading bigots of his time and finally appropriate his name to peddle an agenda which essentially hinges around political and social reaction.

Wishing you the best for beginning this conversation among students who yearn to become vehicle for social change tomorrow, I would like to share some of my ideas around the theme.

Yes, we definitely need to understand Ambedkar’s role as a Chairman of the drafting committee of independent India’s constitution and the skilful  manner in which he ‘piloted the draft’ in the constitutent assembly but also how during his more than three decade long political career he put forward ‘variety of political and social ideas that fertilised Indian thinking’ ( as per late President K R Narayanan ) which contributed to the rulers of the newly independent nation’s decision to adopt the parliamentary form of democracy. Perhaps more important for the ensuing discussion would be his differentiation between what he called ‘political democracy’ – which he defined as ‘one man one vote’ and ‘social democracy’ – which according to him was -one man with one value – and his caution that political democracy built on the divisions, asymmetries, inequalities and exclusions of traditional Indian society would be like ‘a palace built on cow dung’.

We also need to take a look at the unfolding scenario in the country and also see for oneself whether there is a growing dissonance or resonance between what and how Dr Ambedkar envisaged democracy and the actual situation on the ground and how should we see our role in confronting the challenges which lie before it.

As we are remembering the great collosus that he was, not for a moment can we forget the mammoth task undertaken by ‘founding fathers’ – which included leading stalwarts of the independence movement – of the nascent republic who introduced right to vote to every adult citizen, a right for which many countries of the West had to struggle for decades together, in an ambience which was rather overshadwed by the bloody partition riots when the country itself was in a state of abject mass poverty and mass illiteracy.

2.

Before I  move forward towards the crux of my argument I want to take a short detour and understand whether the image of Ambedkar – which most of us carry – which has been taught to us through textbooks and popularised by the ever expanding media matches with his actual contributions as a great leader, scholar and renaissance thinker, all put together.

It would be interesting if all of us who are gathered here try to imagine what sort of image(s) emerge before our eyes if somebody mentions his name. I can mention a few :’ Dalit leader’, Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution’,’ fought for the rights of Scheduled Castes’, ‘embraced Buddhism with lakhs of followers’ Barring exception imagery around Ambedkar does not transcend these limits in most of the cases.

The imagery does not include the historic Mahad Satyagrah which was organised under his leadership way back in 1927 – what we call in Marathi as ‘when water caught fire’ – at the Chawdar Talab (lake) nor does’ it include the burning of Manusmriti in its second phase, which was compared to French revolution by Ambedkar in his speech. It also does not include details of the first political party formed under his leadership called Independent Labour Party, role of many non-dalits or even upper castes in the movement led by him or the historic march to Bombay assembly against the ‘Khot pratha’ where communists had participated in equal strength. His historic speech to the railway workers in Manmad wherein he asked them to fight the twin enemies of ‘Brahmninism’ and ‘Capitalism’ (late thirties) or his struggle for Hindu Code Bill, which ultimately became cause of his resignation from Nehru cabinet, all these details of his stormy life, never get mention in the imagery. One can add many other important interventions under his leadership which definitely does not ‘suit’ his image of a ‘dalit messiah’.

Is not it really surprising that most of us know so little of him, which is definitely not the case with other great leaders who emerged during the anti-colonial movement ?

This selective amnesia about Ambedkar is largely due to the way in which the ruling classes then – dominated by the upper caste elite – tried to belittle his image in a very surreptitious manner. Undoubtedly people or formations involved in the work of broader social transformation, which also included organisations claiming to be his legatees, cannot escape blame for the critical silences around his image, who either remained oblivious to the designs of the Varna elite or were not conscious/careful enough to comprehend their gameplan.

Any student of politics of the oppressed would vouch that it is rather a bane of most of the leaders of the exploited and oppressed who can no more be ignored by the dominant forces. In fact, we have been witness to a similar process which  unfolded itself in USA itself where a very sanitised image of Martin Luther King, has been made popular. Instead of MLK who opposed Vietnam War, looked at capitalism as source of all evils, who equally struggled for workers rights, we have before us an image of King which seems more amenable to the ruling classes there.

And as we celebrate Ambedkar’s life and intend to discuss his ideas on democracy and their relevance today, we should bear in mind that this task still beckons us where we will have to fight with all our strength at our command against ‘reduction’ of his image and what a scholar describes as a deliberate process of ‘mythologising the man and marginalising his meaning’

3.

Now coming to his ideas on Democracy a few things can be definitely added to the ongoing discussion  it can be said that future of Indian democracy depends to a great deal upon revival of Ambedkar’s visionary conception of democracy  which definitely needs to be enlarged and updated in the light of the recent experience.’

But before taking up this aspect it would be opportune to know from Ambedkar himself how he looked at the idea of democracy. Perhaps his speech on the ‘Voice of America’ radio (20 th May 1956) which he gave few months before his death could best summarise his ideas around the concept.

The first point which he makes tells us that ‘Democracy is quite different from a Republic as well as from Parliamentary Government.’ According to him

‘The roots of democracy lie not in the form of Government, Parliamentary or otherwise. A democracy is more than a form of Government. It is primarily a mode of associated living. The roots of Democracy are to be searched in the social relationship, in the terms of associated life between the people who form a society.’

Next he comes to define the word ‘society’ itself.  For him a society is conceived ‘as one by its very nature’ and ‘[T]he qualities which accompany this unity are praiseworthy community of purpose and desire for welfare, loyalty to public ends and mutuality of sympathy and co-operation.’

Interrogating Indian society further he questions whether ‘these ideals are found in Indian society?’  And elaborating on the Indian society which is nothing but ‘an innumerable collection of castes which are exclusive in their life and have no common experience to share and have no bond of sympathy’ he concludes that

‘The existence of the Caste System is a standing denial of the existence of those ideals of society and therefore of democracy.’

Then he further discusses how ‘Indian Society is so imbedded in the Caste System that everything is organized on the basis of caste’ and shares examples from daily life of individuals revolving around the twin concepts of purity and pollution and moves to social-political arena and wryly concludes that ‘[t]here is no room for the downtrodden and the outcastes in politics, in industry, in commerce, and in education.’

Further he discusses other special features of the caste system which ‘[h]ave their evil effects and which militate against Democracy.’ and he focusses on what is called ‘Graded Inequality’ where ‘Castes is not equal in their status’ but rather ‘[a]re standing one above another’ and form ‘an ascending scale of hatred and descending scale of contempt’ which has the most pernicious consequences as ‘[i]t destroys willing and helpful co-operation.’

Then discussing the difference between caste and class, he takes up the second evil effect in the caste system accompanied by inequality which is ‘complete isolation’ which manifests itself in the difference between stimulus and response between two castes which is only ‘one-sided’ and which ‘educates some into masters, educate others into slaves’ and this separation thus ‘prevents social endosmosis’

Later taking up the manner in which one caste is bound to one occupation which ‘cuts at the very roots of democracy’ he tells how this arrangement which denies to ‘open a way to use all the capacities of the individual’  leads to stratification which is ‘is stunting of the growth of the individual and deliberate stunting is a deliberate denial of democracy.’

In the concluding part of his speech he discusses obstacles in the way to end caste system and he points out the ‘system of graded inequality which is the soul of the Caste System’ and also how ‘Indian Society is disabled by unity in action by not being able to know what is its common good’ where ‘the mind of the Indians is distracted and misled by false valuations and false perspectives’ and ends his speech by emphasising that mere education cannot destroy caste system rather education to those ‘[w]ho want to keep up the Caste System is not to improve the prospect of Democracy in India but to put our Democracy in India in greater jeopardy.’

4.

One can also further add that as opposed to the Conservative notions which promotes it as an idea which is an instrument to stop bad people from seizing power  Ambedkar’s conception is geared to social transformation and human progress and he defines it as “a form and a method of government whereby revolutionary changes in the economic and social life of the people are brought about without bloodshed.”

Elucidating the conditions to make it possible it can be inferred that

“(1) there should not be glaring inequalities in society, that is, privilege for one class; (2) the existence of an opposition; (3) equality in law and administration; (4) observance of constitutional morality; (5) no tyranny of the majority; (6) moral order of society: and (7) public conscience.” (See : Shyam Chand, Mainstream, Vol XLV, No 51, DR AMBEDKAR ON DEMOCRACY)

In his speech to the Constituent Assembly on November 25, 1949 he also expressed three cautions and believed that paying heed to them was critical to ensure our democratic institutions did not get subverted : (i) constitutional methods: (ii) not to lay liberties at the feet of a great man: (iii) make a political democracy a social democracy.”

Looking at the fact that India happens to be a multi-denominational society where the common denominator could be secularism which is understood as one of the pillars on which the superstructure of our democracy rests and is a unifying force of our associated life, he emphasised :

“The conception of a secular state is derived from the liberal democratic tradition of the West. No institution which is maintained wholly out of state funds shall be used for the purpose of religious instruction irrespective of the question whether the religious instruction is given by the state or by any other body.”

In a debate in Parliament, he also underlined:

“It (secular state) does not mean that we shall not take into consideration the religious sentiments of the people. All that a secular state means that this Parliament shall not be competent to impose any particular religion upon the rest of the people. That is the only limitation that the Constitution recognises.”

Taking into consideration the possibility that a minority can become victim of the tyranny of the majority, he suggested enough safeguards for their protection :

“The State should guarantee to its citizens the liberty of conscience and the free exercise of his religion including the right to profess, to preach and to convert within limits compatible with public order and morality.”

Prof Jean Dreze ( (econdse.org/wp…/09/JD-Ambedkar-and-future-of-democracy2005.pdf) brings forth an important point in his article wherein he underlines how ‘Ambedkar’s passion for democracy was closely related to his commitment to rationality and the scientific outlook.’ In this connection he quotes one of his last speeches “Buddha or Karl Marx”, wherein summarising the essential teachings of Buddha he elaborates :

“Everyone has a right to learn. Learning is as necessary for man to live as food is … Nothing is infallible. Nothing is binding forever. Everything is subject to inquiry and examination.”

According to him it was important to bring this up looking at the ‘[r]ecent threats to Indian democracy (which) often involve a concerted attack on rationality and the scientific spirit.’

Perhaps one can go on elaborating further on the nuances of Ambedkar’s understanding of democracy but that is not the only aim of this writeup. As promised in the begining we also need to take a look at the unfolding situation.

5.

What is a sine qua non of democracy?

It is the understanding that minority voices will be allowed to flourish and they will not be bulldozed.

At the apparent level majoritarianism – rule by majority – sounds very similar to democracy but it essentially stands democracy on its head. For real democracy to thrive, it is essential that ideas and principles of secularism are at its core. The idea that there will be a clear separation between state and religion and there won’t be any discrimination on the basis of religion has to be its guiding principle.

Majoritarianism thus clearly defeats democracy in idea as well as practice.

While democracy’s metamorphosis into majoritarianism is a real danger, under rule of capital – especially its present phase of neoliberalism – another lurking danger is its evolution into what can be called as plutocracy – government by the rich.

Recently two interesting books have come out discussing 21 st century capitalism. The one by Thomas Picketty ‘Capitalism in the 21 st Century ‘ – which demonstrates convincingly that the twentieth century exhibited a secular tendency toward continuous and widening inequality – has been received well here also. It discusses increasingly disproportionate concentration of income at the top, and the widening inequality that goes along with it, is integral to the system and a consequence of “the central contradiction of capitalism,” (Capital, 571).Piketty’s core theoretical concept is expressed in the formula ‘r>g’, where ‘r’ represents the return on capital/INVESTMENT, and ‘g’ the rate of growth of the economy.

Much like Piketty’s contribution, a major study of democracy in America has also received almost as much attention in the west. It confirms our suspicions that oligarchy has replaced democracy. The authors found that

“policies supported by economic elites and business interest groups were far more likely to become law than those they opposed…. [T]he preferences of the middle class made essentially no difference to a bill’s fate”.

The study “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens”.by Martin Gilens (Princeton) and Benjamin Page (Northwestern) – which entirely undermine the notion that America is a democracy – and carries wider significance has not received attention here..(http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/05/02/apolitical-economy-democracy-and-dynasty/)

. “Majority rule” accounts, construed numerically or by any “median voter” criterion, are found to be a “nearly total failure.” Controlling for the preferences of economic elites and business-oriented interest groups, the preferences of the average citizen have a “near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”

The preferences of economic elites have “far more independent impact upon policy change than the preferences of average citizens do.” This does not mean that ordinary citizens never get what they want by way of policy. Sometimes they do, but only when their preferences are the same as those of the economic elite…

“[M]ajorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts… [I]f policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened.”

(http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/05/02/apolitical-economy-democracy-and-dynasty/)

According to the authors their results are ‘troubling news for advocates of “populistic” democracy.’ “When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose…even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.”

In such an unfolding situation, where we are faced with this dangers of democracy metamorphosing into majoritarianism and democracy becoming oligarchy with the highly undemocratic, violent Indian society – which glorifies violence against the oppressed and legitimises, sanctifies inequality in very many ways acting as a backdrop question arises what needs to be done ?

Jean Dreze, in the same article suggests a course of action which merits attention

“[t]he best course of action may be to revive the Directive Principles of the Constitution, and to reassert that these principles are “fundamental in the governance of the country” (Article 37).

Indeed, in spite of much official hostility to these principles today, there are unprecedented opportunities for asserting the economic and social rights discussed in the constitution – the right to education, the right to information, the right to food, the right to work, and the right to equality, among others. Dr. Ambedkar’s advice to “educate, organise and agitate” is more relevant than ever.”

 

అసలు బిలియనీర్లను పెంచటమెందుకు ? వారిని విరాళాల కోసం అడుక్కోవటం ఎందుకు ?

Tags

, ,

ధర్మకర్తృత్వం-దాతల బండారం-4

ఎం కోటేశ్వరరావు

వ్యాపారులు ఎక్కువగా దాన ధర్మాలు చేయాలా ? దాన ధర్మాల పేరుతో ఎక్కువ వ్యాపారం చేయాలా అన్న ప్రశ్న ఎదురైనపుడు గతంలో ఏం జరిగిందో చూస్తే ఫేస్‌బుక్‌ సిఇఓ మార్క్‌ జుకెర్‌బర్గ్‌ ధర్మ వ్యాపారం ఎలా చేయబోతున్నాడో ముందు ముందుగానీ తెలియదు. లాన్‌సెట్‌ అనే వైద్య పత్రిక 2009లో జరిపిన అధ్యయనంలో గేట్స్‌ ఫౌండేషన్‌ 1998-2007 మధ్య ఇచ్చిన గ్రాంట్లలో కేవలం 1.4శాతమే ప్రభుత్వ రంగ సంస్ధలలకు వెళ్లగా మిగతా మొత్తం 659 ప్రభుత్వేతర సంస్ధలు పొందాయి, వాటిలో 37శాతమే మధ్య లేదా అల్పాదాయ దేశాలలో ప్రధాన కార్యాలయాలను కలిగి వున్నాయి. బడా కార్పొరేట్లు ధర్మ ఫౌండేషన్లను ఏర్పాటు చేసిన కాలాన్ని కూడా మనం గమనంలోకి తీసుకోవాలి. ప్రపంచ బ్యాంకు, అంతర్జాతీయ ద్రవ్య నిధి సంస్దలు వ్యవస్తాగత సర్దుబాట్ల పేరుతో మెజారిటీ ప్రపంచ దేశాలకు ప్రయివేటీకరణ, విద్య, వైద్యం వంటి సేవారంగాల బాధ్యతల నుంచి ప్రభుత్వాలు తప్పుకోవాలని షరతులు విధించి అమలు జరిపిస్తున్న కాలంలో ధనికుల ఫౌండేషన్లు వునికిలోకి వచ్చాయి. ప్రజలు, ప్రభుత్వాల మధ్య ఏర్పడిన ఖాళీలో ప్రభుత్వ ఏతర(ఎన్‌జివో)లను ప్రవేశపెట్టారు. అంతే కాదు ప్రభుత్వాలు తమ జాతీయ ప్రాధాన్యతలను నిర్ణయించుకోవటంలోనూ, ప్రపంచ బ్యాంకు ఆదేశాల మేరకు ఎన్‌జిఓలతో సమన్వయ పరుచుకోవటంలోనూ పొంతన కుదరక ఎద్దు-దున్న దున్నకం మాదిరి తయారైంది. ఎండ పెరిగే కొద్ది ఎద్దు నీడలోకి లాగ నీడ తగ్గేకొద్దీ దున్న ఎండలోకి లాగ అన్నట్లుగా తయారై వ్యవసాయం మూలనబడినట్లుగా అంతిమంగా జనం నష్టపోయారు. జాతీయ ప్రాధాన్యతలు వెనుక్కుపోయాయి. ఎయిడ్స్‌ హెచ్‌ఐవి సమాచారం మరియు నివారణ సంస్ధ ఐ బేస్‌ ప్రతినిధి పోలీ క్లేడన్‌ దీన్ని గురించి మాట్లాడుతూ మీకు హెచ్‌ఐవి వుండి వేరే వారు ప్రయోగదశలోవున్న ఔషధాలకు నిధులు చెల్లిస్తుంటే మీ సంరక్షణ సరిగా జరగకపోవచ్చు, వారికి ఈ ఏడాది ఈ ఆలోచన వచ్చి వచ్చే ఏడాది మరొకదానిమీదకు మళ్లితే మీ సంగతేమిటి అని ప్రశ్నించారు. ప్రభుత్వాలు అలా చీటికి మాటికి ఏడాదికొక ప్రాధాన్యతలను మార్చుకోవు. దాతృత్వ సంస్ధల జోక్యం వలన ప్రజారోగ్య కార్యక్రమాలు అడ్డదిడ్డంగా తయారవుతాయి. కొన్ని సందర్భాలలో ఆయాదేశాల పౌరులకు అంతగా ప్రాధాన్యం కాని వాటికి ధనికులు నిధులు అందచేస్తారని ఆక్స్‌ఫర్డ్‌ విశ్వవిద్యాలయానికి చెందిన పరిశోధకురాలు దేవీ శ్రీధర్‌ హెచ్చరించారు.

ప్రయివేటు ఫౌండేషన్లు, ఎన్‌జీవోల భాగస్వామ్యం పెరగటంతో మరోవైపున ఐక్యరాజ్యసమితి ద్వారా ప్రపంచ ఆరోగ్యానికి అందచేసే నిధులు 1990-2008 మధ్య 32 నుంచి 14శాతానికి తగ్గాయి. దీనివలన జరిగేదేమిటి? మూడు లోంచి ఒకటి తీసి వేసి మిగిలిన దానికి ఒకటి కలిపితే ఏమౌతుందో ప్రపంచ ఆరోగ్యానికి అదే జరిగింది. అవి కూడా పైన చెప్పుకున్నట్లు ఒక పద్దతి ప్రకారం కాకుండా అస్తవ్యస్తం అయ్యాయి. గేట్స్‌ఫౌండేషన్‌ ప్రపంచ ఆరోగ్య సభ సిఫార్సు చేసిన వాటికి గాక ముందుగా తాను అనుకున్న పధకాలకే ప్రపంచ ఆరోగ్య సంస్ధకు నిధులు అందచేస్తున్నది. ప్రపంచ బ్యాంకు సంస్కరణలలో భాగంగా ప్రభుత్వాలు వైద్య సేవరంగం నుంచి వైదొలగాలన్నది ఒక షరతు. దానిని అమలు జరపటానికి తెల్లవారే సరికి ఆసుపత్రులను మూసివేస్తే రాజకీయంగా అధికారంలో వున్న పార్టీలు, ప్రభుత్వాలకు ఇబ్బందులు వస్తాయి. అందువలన పొమ్మనకుండా పొగ పెట్టినట్లు మొదటి దశలో ప్రాధమిక ఆరోగ్య కేంద్రాలకు తగిన వైద్యులు, సిబ్బంది, పరికరాలు లేకుండా వాటిని పడకేయించారు. మిగిలిన ప్రభుత్వ ఆసుపత్రులకు వెళ్లటం కంటే నేరుగా నరకానికి పోవటం మంచిది అనుకొనే విధంగా ఆసుపత్రులను తయారు చేశారా లేదా ? పర్యవసానం ఏమైంది? కార్పొరేట్‌ ఆసుపత్రులు మహానగరాల నుంచి మామూలు పట్టణాలకు చేరాయి. రైతులు, వ్యవసాయ కార్మికులు రుణగ్రస్తులెందుకు అవుతున్నారంటే ఆసుపత్రులకు వెళ్లేందుకు చేస్తున్న అప్పులు కూడా తోడు అవుతున్నాయన్నది అనేక పరిశోధనల్లో తేలింది. కార్పొరేట్‌ ఆసుపత్రిలో చేరి బీమా లేకుండా అప్పులు పాలు కాకుండా బయటకు వచ్చిన సామాన్యులెవరైనా వుంటే గుండెమీద చేయి వేసుకొని చెప్పమనండి. ఇప్పుడు ప్రాధమిక ఆరోగ్య కేంద్రాలతో మొదలు పెట్టి క్రమంగా ఆసుపత్రులను ప్రయివేటు వైద్యులకు , ఎన్‌జిఓలకు అప్పగించేందుకు ముందుకు పోతున్నారు.

ఒక ధనవంతుడికి జనమంతా తన మాదిరి చేపలు తింటే మంచిది కదా అన్న ఆలోచన వచ్చిందట. రాగానే ఒక లారీలో చేపలు తీసుకు వెళ్లి దగ్గరుండి మరీ పంపిణీ చేయించాడట. అందరూ ఎగబడి తీసుకుంటుంటే అక్కడున్న జనంలోని ఒక యువకుడు అలాగే నిలబడి పోవటం ఆ ధనికుడికి ఆశ్చర్యం కలిగించింది. ఏం నీకు చేపలు అవసరం లేదా తీసుకోవటం లేదు. అనగానే నీవంటి దాతలు నాకు దయా ధర్మంగా ఇచ్చే చేపలను తినటానికి నాకు సిగ్గుగా వుంది. నాకు జాలితో మీరిచ్చే చేపలు కాదు ప్రభుత్వం ఇచ్చే వల కావాలి అన్నాడట. పిచ్చివాడా వెంటనే తినేందుకు అవసరమైన చేపలు ఇస్తుంటే వల అడుగుతావేమిటి అని ధనవంతుడు అడిగాడు. మీకు ఈ రోజు బుద్ది పుట్టింది గనుక చేపలు ఇచ్చారు. రేపు మనస్సు మారినా మీ దగ్గర లేకపోయినా మా పరిస్ధితి ఏమిటి అని ప్రశ్నించిన యువకుడు తానే సమాధానం చెబుతూ మీరు వుండొచ్చు లేకపోవచ్చు, శాశ్వతంగా వుండే ప్రభుత్వం వలలను సమకూర్చితే జీవితాంతం మేము చేపలు పట్టుకొని నాలుగు డబ్బులు సంపాదించుకుంటాము, మేము తింటాము అందుకే వల అడిగాను అన్నాడట.

అంతిమంగా ఆరోగ్య సమస్యలను జవాబుదారీగలిగిన ప్రభుత్వాలే పరిష్కరించాలి తప్ప స్వచ్చంద సంస్ధలు పరిష్కరించలేవు. ప్రభుత్వ ఆసుపత్రులను నిర్వీర్యం చేసిన ప్రభుత్వాలు ప్రజారోగ్యాన్ని గాలికి వదలి వేసి కార్పొరేట్‌ ఆసుపత్రులకు ఏటా వందల కోట్ల రూపాయలను ఎలా కట్టబెడుతున్నాయో చూస్తున్నాము. ఆరోగ్యశ్రీ వలన పేదలకు వుపయోగం జరుగుతోందా లేదా అంటే జరుగుతోంది. అందుకయ్యే ఖర్చులో సగం సొమ్ముతో ప్రభుత్వ ఆసుపత్రులలో అదే రకం వైద్యం చేయవచ్చు. మిగిలిన మొత్తాన్ని మరొక ప్రజా సంక్షేమానికి ఖర్చు చేయాలి తప్ప కార్పొరేట్ల పరంచేయటం ఏమిటి. ఈ కార్పొరేట్‌ ఆసుపత్రులన్నింటా అంతర్జాతీయ జలగల పెట్టుబడులు ప్రవహిస్తున్నాయి. ధనికులు మరింతగా ముందుకు వచ్చి దానధర్మాలు చేయాలని, వారికి అలాంటి మంచి మనస్సు కలిగేలా చూడాలని కొందరు ప్రార్ధనలు జరుపుతున్నారు. దీని అర్ధం ఏమిటి? కార్పొరేట్లు మరింతగా పెరగాలని, వారు చేసే ధర్మాలు కూడా పెరగాలనే కదా? దీన్నే మరోవిధంగా చెప్పాలంటే ఇప్పుడున్న దోపిడీ ఇలాగే కొనసాగాలి, కావాలంటే పేదలకు ఎంతో కొంత సొమ్ముదానంగా ఇస్తాం అని చెప్పటమే. ప్రపంచ ప్రజల ఆరోగ్య సమస్యల పరిష్కారానికి ఇది అసలు పరిష్కారమే కాదు అంటున్నారు ఎందరో. అన్నింటికీ మించి అటువంటి బిలియనీర్లను పెంచే వ్యవస్ధను కొనసాగనివ్వటం ఎందుకు ? విరాళాలు ఇమ్మని అడగటం ఎందుకు ? ఇది సమస్యను పక్కదారి పట్టించటమే కదా !

Read Hatred in the belly: Politics behind the appropriation of Dr Ambedkar’s writings

Tags

, ,

 roundtableindia.co.in/

Ambedkar Age Collective

hitbamazon

Dear friends, we’re happy to announce the release of our first book, Hatred in the belly: Politics behind the appropriation of Dr Ambedkar’s writings, published by The Shared Mirror Publishing House. It is available on amazon here. 

Hatred in the belly, as you know, is a compilation of the debates triggered by the attempted appropriation of Babasaheb’sAnnihilation of Caste, which were featured on Round Table India.

Hatred in the belly is a Telugu phrase (kaDupulO kasi) taken from a speech delivered by poet Joopaka Subhadra, in Hyderabad, on the appropriation of Babasaheb Ambedkar’s Annihilation of Caste. The speech, included in this volume, aptly summarises the deep-seated hostility of Brahminic India towards the Dalit Bahujan. Similarly, the other essays and speeches collected in this volume, written and delivered by a number of writers, academics, students, and activists (referred to as the Ambedkar Age Collective in this book), unfurl before you a critical tapestry dissecting the hegemonic brahminic discourse which works towards delegitimizing the radical legacy of Amebdkarite thought. The most stark example of these efforts, from the ‘left’ and the ‘right’ of the Indian political spectrum, is the Navayana edition of Babasaheb’s AoC with an ‘introduction’ by Arundhati Roy.

The works collected here emerged as spontaneous reactions to the Roy-Navayana project from multiple locations and in multiple languages. The varied interventions, which began online, and the discursive terrains it opened up offer us a glimpse of the ways through which the marginalised resist continued attempts made at hegemonising their knowledge and lives by the brahminic oppressors irrespective of their political leanings.

Authors include: Bojja Tharakam, Adv. Dr. Suresh Mane, Anoop Kumar, U. Sambashiva Rao, Sunny Kapicadu, K K Baburaj, Joopaka Subhadra, Dr. K Satyanarayana, Anu Ramdas, Kuffir, Gurinder Azad, Shakyamuni, Dr Sangeeta Pawar, Dr O.K. Santhosh, Dr B. Ravichandran, Dalit Camera: Through Un-Touchable Eyes, Karthik Navayan,  Vaibhav Wasnik, Nilesh Kumar, Asha Kowtal, Nidhin Shobhana, Gee Imaan Semmalar, Syam Sundar, Murali Shanmugavelan, Praveena Thaali, Dr Karthick RM, Huma Dar, Joby Mathew, James Michael, Akshay Pathak, Vinay Bhat, Yogesh Maitreya, Thongam Bipin, Sruthi Herbert, Gaurav Somwanshi, Kadhiravan, Rahul Gaikwad, Joe D’Cruz.

Buy the book on Amazon here: http://www.amazon.in/gp/product/8192993000/ref=olp_product_details?ie=UTF8&me

Product details

Paperback: 263 pages
Publisher: The Shared Mirror Publishing House; First Edition edition (2015)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 8192993000
ISBN-13: 978-8192993003

 

The returns of Marx

Tags

, , ,

Aldo Tortorella from the latest issue of the journal MARXIST CRITICISM we publish the introduction returns of Marx, organized by Fondazione Luigi Longo and Marxist criticism in Alexandria, on 22-24 October 2015..

A return, almost a fashion, Marx was widely spoken after the start of the Great Depression opened in 2008 by the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy and the risk of other very large US banks – then saved with public money, reflecting a mechanism , said conventionally liberal, specializing in privatize profits and socialize losses. Printing and dissemination of the texts of Marx multiplied worldwide, manifested new movements inspired directly or indirectly to a critique of the financial capital, found vast echo research Piketty, non-Marxist, the capital in the XXI century and its concentration in the same way and in the same hands as ever, a topic of interest Marxian.

More recently, the confirmation of a return was made ​​from an unusual source but sensitive to the spirit of the times as the world of the visual arts, with a dedication to Marx of the Venice Biennale this year, including a public reading and systematic Text of the Capital . The greater part of our ineffable daily press has treated the subject almost as a kind of strangeness of the Nigerian curator, who – Okwi Enwezor – is, in fact, one of the most important American intellectuals of matter, distinguished university professor and creator of the most great art exhibitions in the world. The text of his presentation of the biennial, inspired by the reading of Walter Benjamin’s Angelus Novus of Klee, realizes with painstaking meticulousness of the origin and meaning of the reference to Marx: “Capital – writes – is the great tragedy of our time . Today looms more than any other element in every sphere of life … ‘, determining whether “the state of affairs” is the way to watch them.

The Capital of Marx since its release – he adds – has involved not only politicians, economists, philosophers, but artists and the exhibition in Venice, then promises to perceive – says – “the aura, the effects, the consequences and spectra of the capital. ” That the program is successful or not is and will be, of course, the subject of discussion, but it is well proven the validity of a return to those who first put under scrutiny, in fact, the foundation of the contemporary world and it has envisioned the consequences.

After 89

The last burial officer, who seemed the final one, was filed at the end of the Soviet Union. Many funeral orations were spoken by publicists and thinkers of various kinds. Among the political parties of the traditional left of ancient origin terzinternazionalista, but also in the socialist parties, and among many of the intellectuals who were, or were supposed to close them there was a race to deny any relationship with Marx.In Italy, as you know, it takes place the transformation of the Communist Party, party planning but inspired by Marxian reworking of Gramsci. In the German social rethinking of the program of Bad Godesberg – namely the total repudiation of Marxism – begun in the years of Brandt, and continued by Oskar Lafontaine, will close with the “new center” of Schroeder. England Blair will do away with the article of the statute it provides that aims to overcome the capitalist property.

Here, nell’aneddotica of that hasty transformation is also a place for our magazine Marxist Critique , redeemed at the price of a penny, and so saved dall’autodafé collective, and made ​​reborn to a new life. The task that we inscribed in the head, and that has a time even in today’s conference, was to “rethink the left” – the theme, as seen in each other daily, never exhausted.

Then it seemed to some of us, in addition to other considerations, supremely unfair that he considered himself the old Marx as head even last of the tragic fates of the Soviet system came to collapse or errors that the Italian Communists could have done.

An injustice because there had been among the staunchest critics of the Soviet model so many excellent scholars of Marx (including several Italian), all Marxists persecuted by Stalinism, as well as politicians who claimed to be inspired by him (including, albeit belatedly, the top leaders of the Communist Party). But also a mistake because we felt that his thought – and the attempt to use it critically as already suggested the name of the magazine – was essential precisely in order to a radical renewal of ideas and political practices of the left.A renewal is essential, but to qualify for both the change in the global economic and political reality with the global victory of the capitalist model and for the transformations in production systems, in lives and in human relations induced by scientific discoveries and the technological revolution of the century .

In the twentieth century

The story of unwise burials and recurring return alive Marx would, I believe, a search distinct from those on many Marxists, whose history began even during the lifetime of Marx, and the subject of a vast bibliography, is largely summarized by us, at least until the beginning of the eighties of the last century, a collective work conceived and edited by Einaudi Hobsbawm and others. The study of death certificates of Marx’s thought, that accompany the moments of greatest success of the various experiences economic, social and political the capital structure, there would seem to me less important than that of his subsequent resurrection to major crises or disasters of wars.

If at the beginning, at the time of the triumphant bourgeoisie and colonialism ruling, the slating of the economic and social development of Marx, moved by optimism scientist and industrialist, they belonged to a theoretical discussion on the law of value, sull’impoverimento absolute, on ‘outcome of the cyclical crises, after the October Revolution the removal or convictions Marxian analysis were associated largely aversion to the Soviet state nascent. But as well as the outbreak of World War I had done justice to at least some of the more reckless criticisms – like those that assumed a relative ease in overcoming cyclical downturns without contemplating the risk of recourse to war – and had created the revolutionary struggles of the post-war period, the same way the crisis of ’29 brought with it a revival of the analysis Marx and a thorough critique to economic liberalism.

Then, as you know, the ruling classes and the imperial ruling classes were faced with the crisis with the analysis of Keynes and Roosevelt’s reforms in the capital market, while in continental Europe most of the national bourgeoisies were promoting Nazism and fascism and while worldwide Soviet forced collectivization campaign and the repression of dissenting generated the terrible tragedies that you know. He came here to a new time of anti-Marxism combined with the anti-Soviet, with the appreciation of the successes in the West in the internal policies of the Nazis and fascists – and the abandonment of the Spanish republic to Franco – until the new and frightening world war the international anti-fascist alliance again tipped the scale of values ​​and pushed to new interest in Marx a part of the intelligentsia and the new generations matured during the conflict and the resistance.

It was still, however, an interest in which the image of Marx mingled with that of the country of the Battle of Stalingrad and the red flag on the Reichstadt, the country in which, albeit with terrible tragedies, for the first time it had come experimenting the abolition of private ownership of the means of production and exchange.A mixture that was underpinned by new revolutions in the giant China and Cuba in the small. Even the great youth rebellion of ’68 dall’antiautoritarismo move, having the background Vietnam Ho Min did not give us to draw on past revolutions, albeit sometimes, but not always, watching the dissenters persecuted more than the winners.

Equally and not, for as long as the Cold War the anti-Marxist polemic flourished and developed having the background the same image overlay: there was talk of Marx, but it was thought – or were referred – Stalin, Mao, Castro .

The success of the idea promoted by Isaiah Berlin purely negative freedom (ie as total rejection of any interference from the public other than safety of life and property) has the background, in fact, the unacceptability of a model of absolute statism and denial of freedom, as well as the idea, propagated by Thatcher, that the company is purely abstract notion as the only concrete thing are the individuals it targets the very notion of the welfare state, seen almost as an antechamber to the Soviet model of collectivism.

In fact, that overlap, although almost fatal, was essentially arbitrary. In the days of November 1917 a young Italian socialist of great talent, which will be one of the founders of the Communist Party, had written and realized that the October Revolution – which he like millions of people around the world appeared enthusiastic – it was, in Actually, its a revolution against the Capital of Karl Marx. Gramsci differed, in that well-known article on ‘ Avanti , a Marx “tainted by positivism and naturalism” by Marx heir, as he says, “the idealistic thought Italian and German. ‘ The first would be the author of the idea that comes before the capitalist bourgeoisie, its maturity and its crisis, and only at the end of the socialist transformation – and against this Marx, in fact, occurred the October Revolution. In contrast, according to the Marx ‘that never dies, “he taught, according to the young Gramsci, that” the greatest factor of history “is not given the” economic facts brutes “but the relations between human beings,” the society of men “who” develop a collective will, “which” shapes the objective reality that lives, moves, acquires the character of matter telluric boiling, which can be channeled where the will like “2. The times are not required, therefore, and the maturation of consciousness and revolutionary will of the exploited, very long in normal times, could have acceleration due to special reasons – in this case the World War. Unfortunately, the absolute voluntarism that inspired that article born on the wave of emotion and one that did not belong to the old Marx, was not enough and in fact, as we shall see, he could turn against itself.

And, in fact, Gramsci, then, long worked in the notebooks of the jail on that famous passage of the Preface to the Critique of Political Economy of ’59 – omitted in a text written for the party school of 1925, as recalled Fabio Frosini3 – in Marx speaks of the conditions for which you run out of old social formations and the new born, a song that he translates: “No social order ever perishes before they have developed all the productive forces for which it is still not enough, and new, higher relations of production have not taken place before the material conditions of existence of the latter have been hatched in the womb of the old society. Therefore mankind always sets itself only such tasks as it can solve; (If you observe more accurately, you will always find that the task itself arises only where the material conditions for its resolution exist or at least are in the process of their becoming) “4. Gramsci interpret this passage from stripping can read deterministic, but he tried his acuity of thought seeing the substance that is a criticism of the fantasies that, at the same time, defines the actual terrain of the political struggle and ideal, and does not eliminate the role of subjectivity policies. Marx had so little to do with the Soviet model that the Vulgate became known as “Marxism-Leninism” which was added, then, the suffix “Stalinism”, in order to establish a sort of canon immutable. Which, as should be obvious, it was not only distant but opposed to every form of critical thinking – in which Marx also is recognized as a major.

However that mixture and culturally undue overlap was practically inevitable given the origin of the promoters of the ideal of a socialist revolution, and this explains the presumption dell’affossamento definitive Marx following the collapse of the Soviet Union, its dismemberment, the transformation of Russia into a country of capitalism more or less wild. The launch of China in a similar direction, despite the red flag, completed the work. He even spoke of the end of history, in the sense that the winning model would have no alternative. It was a form of self-deception of the winners. The basic reasons that had driven the search for Marx had failed, despite the technological abyss separating us from him. For this is the new return, but if you do not remember the previous one can not understand the difference.

Well dug, old mole!

Today, there is no illusion that somewhere on earth was found the formula of the new world, or that no longer considered inevitable march towards socialism is already embodied in a social formation. Capitalism has shown its ability to huge quantitative development and adaptation, as Marx had predicted, and founded on the desire (ie the individual) and choice (ie free will).

Social ownership of the means of production and exchange, the time and place in which it was attempted, became state property and property in this bureaucratic, and bureaucrats into capitalists robbery. If someone levasse, the call for unity of the proletariat, already rejected in the trenches of World War I, would sound foreign to the reality of a world in which, despite a number of workers than ever, the work must continue to decrease, competition downward it is already deadly fragmentation multiplies misery overflows and generates plenty of recruits for promoters of wars. That is, in short, that this time the return to Marx does not presume to be based on data acquired or easy hopes, and can not have the quality of mature disenchantment.

Born, also, this return by the rapid depletion of the promises implied in the birth of a world unified under the sign of financial capital.

The Cold War ended with the victory of one of the contenders did not open the way to permanent peace and a linear progress. Instead, it returned to the confrontation between the powers and the multiplicity of wars appears to be a world war creeping, potentially explosive. The supposed self-regulating capacity of the market has failed. The idea of ​​infinite development has come up against the physical limits of the planet and threatens the very conditions of life. They do not change, and in many cases increase, the gap between rich and poor and, in each country, between the very rich and the great mass of others. Traveling between the stars but too many people continue to die of hunger, and it seems to be disproportionate welcome those who run away from war and poverty. The pontiff of the Catholic Church had to explain that when he speaks in defense of the poor and against the immoderate gains it does because it is communist but because it is inspired by the Gospel. He had to reinterpret Scripture to explain that the man was not donated the land and the animals that live there to ruin the one and torturing others at will but to protect them.

One would think, with the greatest respect, ‘Well dug, old mole “. In truth, Hamlet says, “Well said, old mole” to the spectrum of the father at the time warned the ground: it was, of course, the voice of the past buried and ignored who returns to tell what he knows, and go in peace. As for Marx, who in the 18th Brumaire he quoted from memory, the mole digging well, as you know, is the image of the revolution which operates under the radar. For us, perhaps, the word spectrum underground is just to Marx now freed from the burden of something that did not belong and also helps those who are distant or hostile. A voice, too, heard so much better after the work of interpretation. For us, but not only for us, it should first reading that did Gramsci who taught to understand, among other things, the mutual influence between the base material, economic, society and all the phenomena called superstructure in lexicon of tradition.

And they have also helped all the jobs that have enabled it to overcome the anachronisms and place it in its time and in its culture, highlighting, for example, the difficulty of this individual to look not only socially determined or the failure to understand the influence patriarchal order in the determination of the male as unacceptable absolute value. A thought does not stay indefinitely because this is no time, but because, in the narrow limits of time, culture and life of its author, opens a new window to look at reality. Now no one, more innocent, drink the hemlock to comply with the law of the city, rather than the more guilty the more frolic. But no one can dispute that the poor Socrates is one of the first inventors of ethics, including the public.

And so it is for Marx. Considering it a kind of Bible, you use it, of course, against himself, perhaps unlikely to endorse or pernicious doctrines of others, as indeed happened (and happens). Seen within its limits and its shortcomings studied for many years, including in this meeting will be discussed, he returns the actuality of who, in fact, found in the capital and along the explosive force, as has been said, the drama of our time, and he teaches about the building of human reality from the ground, trying to see it for what it is and not for what we imagine it to be.

Upload ethics

Can return, so, the author moved by a powerful but misunderstood ethics office that breaks the hypocrisy of the beautiful souls smug virtue of their real or alleged but unable to look at the origins of the evils to deprecate words. The school of thought of Kantian origin who emphasized, at the beginning of the past century, this side of Marx was submerged by those who believed the author of an exact science, then returned to the subject constantly. Its scientific analysis, like every other, is conditioned by the level of knowledge at that time and therefore can be reached continuously partly denial partly correct, but, being the object to which it refers to the social relations – and thus ultimately between people – he would never even born had it not been moved by indignation and a passion. The outrage over the fate of the last and penultimate manufacturers of objects indispensable to life and a good life, a passion for the freedom of each and all. Relations between Marx and Spinoza, a scholar of the passions, now fill a library. The work changes, changes the system of education or employment of consciences, the dominated may ignore or even to be so happy to be so, but without that anger and that passion genuinely experienced, you can not do political action, let alone one called left.

Can return, today, the author who studied this thinking of the future, perhaps in the belief, as certain look, a certain history in the mouth, but said he did not want to do and never did the pastry chef of the future, the ‘ author of an open-ended but not so much because it thus: and so Marx said he was not a Marxist, knowing that their critical method would also cover his work. This is not groped do not know which new orthodoxy, but to read it without distorting lenses to be helped to understand the origin of this distressing problem. And also to be led to a deeper self-criticism.

This world is in danger and forged dominated by capital everywhere and winning first flowering of civilization in places that can not be said to be inspired by Christianity, not only that but also the other Protestant majority here, although raised in the little loyalty or ignorance of the Gospel, as we are now told authoritatively. This is Western civilization today questioned. And the onslaught of fundamentalism losers can not be answered, otherwise the catastrophe, with the fundamentalism of winning. This world is super armed is now closing grimly, as last tried even Switzerland, instead of looking at himself and seek to correct their distortions considering them because of those of others. The tendency to use inordinate force becomes greater, with the attendant risks.

It should react to what is called the left. But having thrown away Marx did not help and, in fact, has been a powerful incentive to slip into the arms of neoliberalism successful and unsuccessful, so the distinction between left and right has become increasingly blurred. It is obvious that not just Marx, but without continuing a rigorous analysis, as was his, the economic and social model in which we live will continue to miss the contribution that the left could give to solve the growing problems of the present. I think that, with open eyes, Marx may be more useful than ever to stimulate research and, also, political action.

2) A. Gramsci, The revolution against the “Capital”, in Id., The future city from 1917 to 1918 , edited by S. Caprioglio, Turin, Einaudi, 1982, p. 514.

3) See. F. Frosini, Preface of ’59 , in G. Liguori, Voza P. (eds), Dictionary Gramscian 1926-1937, Rome, Carocci, 2009, p. 661.

4) A. Gramsci, Appendix. Excerpts from the Notebooks of translation, in Id., Prison Notebooks , edited by V. Gerratana, Rome, Einaudi, 1975, p. 2359.